|
Replies: 61
| visibility 260
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
USC jr losses
Jan 14, 2015, 9:59 AM
|
|
Wide Receiver- Damiere Byrd, Nick Jones, Shaq Roland (two of the best receivers besides Cooper +1 srub)
OL- Corey Robinson, AJ Cann (best OL)
TE- Rory Anderson
QB- Dylan Thompson (only option at QB, did Mitch or Orth get any reps?)
RB- Mike Davis (best RB….Running Baby)
S- Brison Williams (BEST DB by far)
LB- Sharrod Golightly
DL- JT Surratt (BEST DL)
10 total starters, 11 two deep.
Good news they keep all their bad players on defense.
Don't have any replacements for the good ones that leave on offense or defense. They don't lose as much as FSU but they lose their only quality players.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
I've never seen a team relying on one recruiting class
Jan 14, 2015, 10:03 AM
|
|
to turn things around as much as the dirtpeckers. That's why their hair's on fire right now because they know this recruiting class is there only glimmer of hope. They need to hit on 90% of the players coming in which highly doubt happens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
Re: I've never seen a team relying on one recruiting class
Jan 14, 2015, 10:07 AM
|
|
Agreed and they could still lose some. Also what happens if he fires a coach after signing day like the rumors suggest. More players will transfer. Freshmen will be frustrated and little time to find a coach before spring practice. He can do it but it would be stupid. I don't think he will make changes. Ray Tanner has to be aggravated and in a bind. He has a legend of a coach that is screwing up the football program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5151]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17128
Joined: 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
You're 1 player away from greatness
Jan 14, 2015, 10:14 AM
|
|
 .
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
Re: You're 1 player away from greatness
Jan 14, 2015, 10:17 AM
|
|
great at being bad. the elite company of Vandy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
Re: Seriously? 90%
Jan 14, 2015, 10:15 AM
[ in reply to Seriously? 90% ] |
|
So you are content with the other scrubs on defense. Who is gonna be the QB? Who is gonna provide a threat besides Cooper? Who is gonna cover a soul? Skai cant do it himself. His name suggests otherwise but that is besides the point. I fully believe that you will be lucky to get 6-6. @UGA,@TENN, @Mizzou @A&M, UNC neutral site, UCF, Florida, Clemson, LSU at home. Citadel, Vandy, Kentucky are your only should wins. Kentucky could be dangerous too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Seriously? 90%
Jan 14, 2015, 10:16 AM
|
|
Kentucky is not a sure win. Toss up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5151]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17128
Joined: 2005
|
Connor Mitch will be our starting QB
Jan 14, 2015, 10:17 AM
[ in reply to Re: Seriously? 90% ] |
|
I'm not sure why you and tiger woods think we d
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zealot [757]
TigerPulse: 81%
22
|
2 for 6,19 yards...THAT Connor Mitch??
Jan 14, 2015, 11:13 AM
|
|
Sorry to hear that. Well, not really.
Enjoy your fall back to normal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8454]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 11261
Joined: 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5151]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17128
Joined: 2005
|
Connor Mitch will be our starting QB
Jan 14, 2015, 10:18 AM
[ in reply to Re: Seriously? 90% ] |
|
I'm not sure why you and tiger woods think we don't have anyone on our current roster.
We aren't expecting Lorenzo Nunez to c
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5151]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17128
Joined: 2005
|
Connor Mitch will be our starting QB
Jan 14, 2015, 10:18 AM
[ in reply to Re: Seriously? 90% ] |
|
I'm not sure why you and tiger woods think we don't have anyone on our current roster.
We aren't expecting Lorenzo Nunez to come in and start.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14655]
TigerPulse: 80%
49
Posts: 23143
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Connor Mitch will be our starting QB
Jan 14, 2015, 10:20 AM
|
|
lucky for you. nunez is black and we all know superior dont play black qb's
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
Re: Connor Mitch will be our starting QB
Jan 14, 2015, 10:30 AM
[ in reply to Connor Mitch will be our starting QB ] |
|
All I know is that YOUR great Sleeze Slurrier said all summer that he was unimpressed with the backup QBs. Just cause his name is connor does not make him great. Again did he get even ONE meaningful snap, did he get any non meaningful snaps for that matter??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5151]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17128
Joined: 2005
|
Who knows if Mitch is going to be good?
Jan 14, 2015, 10:34 AM
|
|
But I'm not sure what that has to do with the absurdity of tiger woods arguing we are relying on 90% of our recruiting class for next season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
Did I say next season?
Jan 14, 2015, 10:40 AM
|
|
Reread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
Re: Who knows if Mitch is going to be good?
Jan 14, 2015, 10:41 AM
[ in reply to Who knows if Mitch is going to be good? ] |
|
Well, your entire defense besides Skai Moore and Jonathan Walton could use an upgrade, hence the idea that 90% of your class should be expected to help with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5151]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17128
Joined: 2005
|
The fact you can't admit his comment was absurd
Jan 14, 2015, 10:42 AM
|
|
Shows you can discuss the two schools rationally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
I hope you don't replace anyone next year.***
Jan 14, 2015, 10:43 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5151]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17128
Joined: 2005
|
So you're being irrational right now
Jan 14, 2015, 11:01 AM
|
|
Because USC fans aren't rational?
Oh my.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
Rational?
Jan 14, 2015, 11:02 AM
|
|
You think your only must have is a defensive end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14397]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13225
Joined: 2013
|
Re: Rational?
Jan 14, 2015, 1:12 PM
|
|
He must have not watched that team this year if he truly believes a defensive end is their only must have.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: So you're being irrational right now
Jan 14, 2015, 11:09 AM
[ in reply to So you're being irrational right now ] |
|
Nothing rational comes out of this coots mouth. Ease his pain. Release him to the fantasy coot forum so he can dream with the rest of the idiots.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6409]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23651]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 20069
Joined: 2011
|
Next year was already supposed to a dumpster fire.
Jan 14, 2015, 11:22 AM
|
|
The fact that they lit the match a year early was just a great Christmas present LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5151]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17128
Joined: 2005
|
Can you show me where I said we will be good
Jan 14, 2015, 11:23 AM
[ in reply to How is this for rational? ] |
|
Or are you going to continue creating your own reality to argue against?
I have no idea whether or not we will be good next seas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5151]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17128
Joined: 2005
|
Can you show me where I said we will be good
Jan 14, 2015, 11:23 AM
[ in reply to How is this for rational? ] |
|
Or are you going to continue creating your own reality to argue against?
I have no idea whether or not we will be good next season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
Re: Can you show me where I said we will be good
Jan 14, 2015, 1:10 PM
|
|
RAISES hand... I have the answer Ms. Teacher. The coots will not have a good season next year. The only way the could is if 90% of their recruiting class pans out. That won't happen therefore bad season followed by bad season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3820]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [67425]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 89909
Joined: 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6409]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14488]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 11103
Joined: 2012
|
Bahahahaha
Jan 14, 2015, 2:29 PM
[ in reply to Who knows if Mitch is going to be good? ] |
|
Classof09 looks to have eaten a giant slice of humble pie the last month or so...dude used to come over here running his mouth non stop...order has been restored!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [762]
TigerPulse: 64%
22
|
Re: Seriously? 90%
Jan 14, 2015, 10:15 AM
[ in reply to Seriously? 90% ] |
|
I see know way Dante sawyer gets in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Seriously? 90%
Jan 14, 2015, 10:16 AM
|
|
Why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [368]
TigerPulse: 75%
16
|
Re: Ok, here is some Rational thinking for you.
Jan 14, 2015, 11:18 AM
[ in reply to Seriously? 90% ] |
|
Your defense was horrible this year and yet you lose your 2nd best defender in Golightly. You lose your best RB, Your ONLY QB with ANY Experience, at least 2 starting Receivers, and the entire left side of your OL, (although I wish Robinson had 10 more years).
What he was saying is that if you miss on many of these recruits you could be down for quite a while, and you've already lost quite a few of the best recruits you had. Connor Mitch may be good, or he may suck, but fact is he has NO experience because y'all weren't afforded the opportunity to play him much because of how this year went. BTW, the other factor is you still have Lorenzo calling the shots on Defense which I hope stays the same forever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5151]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17128
Joined: 2005
|
You can try to rationalize it all you want
Jan 14, 2015, 11:31 AM
|
|
But you're just ignoring reality if you think our future is dependent on 23 out of 26 kids.
No recruiting class in history has had that type of success rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
Our 2013 class is pretty close.
Jan 14, 2015, 11:35 AM
|
|
And what I'm saying is if you miss on a bunch this cycle....
You won't see success for a long time.
I wonder if Tanner can fire Spurrier? That'll be the big question in 2-3 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5151]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17128
Joined: 2005
|
You mean if we miss on 2.6 kids
Jan 14, 2015, 11:38 AM
|
|
We won't be successful?
You should go back to changing the subject instead of actually defending it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
Re: You mean if we miss on 2.6 kids
Jan 14, 2015, 11:40 AM
|
|
If you like losing then carry on!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
Re: You mean if we miss on 2.6 kids
Jan 14, 2015, 7:52 PM
[ in reply to You mean if we miss on 2.6 kids ] |
|
I'll gladly change the subject. Exactly how many wins do you expect the coots to have next year?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5151]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17128
Joined: 2005
|
No clue
Jan 14, 2015, 8:04 PM
|
|
But we will be winless if we are playing 23 true freshman in significant roles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
Re: No clue
Jan 14, 2015, 8:15 PM
|
|
Ah so the coot admits to being clueless!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9174]
TigerPulse: 69%
44
Posts: 14647
Joined: 2002
|
Seriously, you're an idiot
Jan 15, 2015, 1:26 AM
[ in reply to Seriously? 90% ] |
|
Give me three strong points on your personnel matchup against ours to convince me you are formidable contender in our game with you Ribbon Tails.
-Doc
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23651]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 20069
Joined: 2011
|
I'd say Clemson is, BUT in a toal different direction.
Jan 14, 2015, 10:08 AM
[ in reply to I've never seen a team relying on one recruiting class ] |
|
First off, before anyone gets upset, there's guys in this class that will play and contribute this year. But when you get right down to it, there's not a single one that NEEDED to win it all. Everything in this class is gravy , and is the class that puts Clemson into the Elite Class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23651]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 20069
Joined: 2011
|
Losing those 8 non qualifiers last year
Jan 14, 2015, 10:05 AM
|
|
will really show next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28274]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 21691
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Losing those 8 non qualifiers last year
Jan 14, 2015, 10:24 AM
|
|
Having an athletic discussion on reality with a coot fan is next to impossible because of severe delusional problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
100 years of losing
Jan 14, 2015, 10:26 AM
|
|
They have to stay in a proverbial bubble of sunshine happiness or else they would all be suicidal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [368]
TigerPulse: 75%
16
|
Re: Roland's a Junior***
Jan 14, 2015, 11:31 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [61642]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 43091
Joined: 1998
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
Re: Roland's a Junior***
Jan 14, 2015, 1:09 PM
[ in reply to Re: Roland's a Junior*** ] |
|
And he is a junior that is leaving.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2929]
TigerPulse: 98%
33
|
Re: Roland's a Junior***
Jan 14, 2015, 1:12 PM
|
|
to go work at MacDonalds.
There is no chance in Hades he gets drafted.
Biggest waste of talent I have ever seen. Watched him play several times at Lexington High and he was a straight up baller. I get that HS & College is different, but he clearly never had the work ethic to realize his potential at SCU. Sad, sad, sad,
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3995]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: USC jr losses
Jan 14, 2015, 8:53 PM
|
|
I tried to tell all my Coot buddies before this season they'd probably lose 5+ games and they ended up losing 6. They might not even have a winning record next year. It's not all that hard to predict. If you don't recruit very well and you don't get your backups some significant snaps, you don't win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5151]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17128
Joined: 2005
|
We easily could have been 10-3 last year
Jan 15, 2015, 8:57 AM
|
|
We blew three fourth quarter 13+ point leads. We weren't as bad as you're making us out to be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [762]
TigerPulse: 64%
22
|
Re: We easily could have been 10-3 last year
Jan 15, 2015, 9:20 AM
|
|
Sorry we playedidn't you guys. You were not a good football team. I expect your defense to be improved but the offense to take a few steps back. Even if USC stays the same, the reams they play are getting better
Lsu
uga
Kent
ten
Fla
Clemson
UNC
Should all be better
Mizzo may stay the same or take a small step down, but you play them at there place.
All the above teams are better than USC next year
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16787]
TigerPulse: 91%
51
Posts: 27006
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [645]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
To be fair
Jan 15, 2015, 1:13 AM
|
|
We lose a lot too. 8 defensively in Beasley, Watson, Jarrett, Crawford, Anthony, Stewart, Smith, and Peters and 4 offensively in Hump, Webster, Davis, and Beasley. Offensively we'll be fine as long as 4 is healthy but we'll truly see how good Coach V is this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3995]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: To be fair
Jan 15, 2015, 3:13 AM
|
|
The difference though is, most, if not all the replacements have seen significant snaps and are familiar with how BV wants the defense run. That really didn't/doesn't happen down in Cootlumbia. Not to mention they completely changed scheme's this past year.
I think the defense will be strong again next year regardless of the turnover cause not only do we have the talent but this past year's defense created an identity on that side of the ball. I don't think we somehow lose that in one year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: To be fair
Jan 15, 2015, 7:01 AM
|
|
Agree with you on the defense. The defense was more than about the seniors. Granted, Beasley, Jarrett and Anthony will be missed. However, Lawson, Reader and Boulware are ready to step in. I keep harping on the fact that we have the steady influence of BV, DB, MR, and MH on these guys. We seriously reloaded on the DL with Huggins, Wilkins, Cervenka and Johnson. I dont see any of those guys redshirting. Course, obviously Im not the decision maker here but I would be surprised if any of them did. They need to get battle tested early. They are physically ready. Should be a fun spring to watch on both sides of the ball in the trenches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 61
| visibility 260
|
|
|
50
