|
Replies: 14
| visibility 2171
|
Clemson Icon [26065]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 34127
Joined: 1998
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [5880]
TigerPulse: 47%
39
Posts: 18946
Joined: 2005
|
Yeah history is not going to be kind to this court
Oct 31, 2025, 1:14 PM
|
|
at least the courts of the late 1800s had an excuse for their racism.
But a lot of the cases are going to be looked at in the same vein as Plessy v. Ferguson.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [19043]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 20413
Joined: 2015
|
New sky falling everyday. Trump broke yalls minds.***
2
Oct 31, 2025, 1:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1715]
TigerPulse: 94%
31
|
Re: New sky falling everyday. Trump broke yalls minds.***
1
Oct 31, 2025, 1:31 PM
|
|
OP has never heard of Earl Warren
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Time Great [90066]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 82046
Joined: 1999
|
Warren was historically great. Brown v Board of
2
Oct 31, 2025, 2:22 PM
|
|
Education, Miranda v Arizona, Loving v Virginia...
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1715]
TigerPulse: 94%
31
|
Re: Warren was historically great. Brown v Board of
1
Oct 31, 2025, 7:30 PM
|
|
Education, Miranda v Arizona, Loving v Virginia...
Wrong
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Solid Orange [1343]
TigerPulse: 83%
28
|
Re: Warren was historically great. Brown v Board of
Oct 31, 2025, 8:31 PM
|
|
Dipshyt here wants to go back to segregation and cops spying in his bedroom window.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1715]
TigerPulse: 94%
31
|
Re: Warren was historically great. Brown v Board of
Oct 31, 2025, 11:37 PM
|
|
Dipshyt here wants to go back to segregation and cops spying in his bedroom window.
Warren court did not end segregation, the 1964 Civil Rights Act ended it
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Time Great [94302]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 64507
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Campus Hero [13396]
TigerPulse: 94%
48
Posts: 16466
Joined: 2021
|
The author should be ashamed for citing Lisa Graves as a legal scholar
1
3
Oct 31, 2025, 2:44 PM
|
|
If Lisa Graves is considered by any credible lawyers professional organization as a “scholar,” then that destroys any credibility that described her as a ‘legal scholar’ that organization might ever have had.
Her assertion that SCOTUS ruled that a president is immune from any crime is BS for the consumption of low information Trump haters.
The SCOTUS ruling put meat on the bones of the powers and privileges of the president as written in Article 2.
Here is the summary of John Roberts’ led SCOTUS ruling:
The president is immune from prosecution for actions taken (here comes the key part that DEI Graves missed) … within the ‘outer perimeter’ of the official duties of the president.
The outer perimeter allows for mistakes that a POTUS might make in executing his duties as Commander in Chief. For example, Obama ordered an air strike in the Middle East on a vehicle that was occupied by American citizens. All were killed. Obama killed them … why wasn’t prosecuted for using his presidential powers for outright killing of Americans? Because Obama was doing his best to kill the enemy, with ‘killing the enemy’ being within (not ‘outside of’) the outer perimeter of presidential responsibilities.
Trump and J6. He held what he had intended to be a peaceful protest to just one single Congressional House if Representative -and- one single Senator from that same state to formally dispute … on the floor of the House chamber … of the 2020 election results from their state.
That was it.
A peaceful protest would have accomplished that goal; State of AZ was in the process of filing their challenge. However, the seditious Trump-hating FBI and Washington DC police (not the police chief, but intillegence officer) triggered the FedSurrection riots. These riots were timed so that the HoR was immediately evacuated; this stopped the AZ House member and AZ Senator from issuing their formal (in writing, and signed by both men) challenge to the AZ election results.
(*). Had the AZ election challenge been executed, then that would have triggered an automatic (statuary) case to evaluate the elevtion process, whether or not the individual states had each followed their own constitutions’ laws with regard to the conduct of their individual election processes, and any other irregularities.
(*). Without that AZ election challenge being formally submitted, John Roberts, following The Constitution to the letter, said that SCITUS had no standing to hear election disputes.
(***). Trump had no reason to stage a violent protest. There was no motive on his behalf. The chance that he had was only available if the House of Representatives HAD REMAINED in session.
Lisa Graves is either an incompetent lawyer or a propagandist who makes her living feeding garbage to low information citizens.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Beast [6235]
TigerPulse: 88%
40
|
Re: The author should be ashamed for citing Lisa Graves as a legal scholar
1
Oct 31, 2025, 7:37 PM
|
|
POTD
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Spirit [9989]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet HOFer [125867]
TigerPulse: 100%
66
Posts: 79678
Joined: 2003
|
Re: John Roberts betrayed America for Donald Trump - The worst Chief Justice in
Nov 1, 2025, 8:49 AM
|
|
I have said it before, and I will say it again. The further we put ourselves into debt, the more unlivable this country will become. What we are experiencing is no different from the gradual decline of previous failed empires, where the elites are looting the system while services and safety nets are being slashed fior the most vunerable. Eventually, this will lead to mass protests unlike anything this country has ever seen, and our Executive is well aware of it, taking measures to establish complete authoritarian control. It is very cynical and unfortunate.
The people working low-paying service sector jobs will feel the brunt of this in the coming years. The best we can hope for is that it unifies the country against the elites, because we can only blame immigrants for so long. But Trump will continue his rhetoric and find other marginalized groups to target, many of whom post in this forum. We can either band together and push back, or allow ourselves to be divided and fight among one another.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 2171
|
|
|