|
Replies: 11
| visibility 2407
|
Game Changer [1658]
TigerPulse: 58%
31
|
Idiot on Radio
2
2
Dec 1, 2024, 8:12 PM
|
|
Some guy on the 5th otr Sat. said that Clemson was better in EVERY position than Carolina. Really folks how idiotic can you be ?
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [31616]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 35749
Joined: 2009
|
Donnell Clark said that***
2
Dec 1, 2024, 8:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16876]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 10599
Joined: 2009
|
That was yesterday afternoon
1
Dec 1, 2024, 8:15 PM
|
|
Are you recording the 5th quarter show and listening to it the dat after?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [169]
TigerPulse: 69%
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2622]
TigerPulse: 89%
33
|
Sammy Brown is dropped back in coverage
1
Dec 1, 2024, 10:10 PM
|
|
On this play and runs Sellers down effortlessly from the far side of the field.
He should have been the all time spy all game long instead of Carter or Woodaz. He is the only one of the trio with enough sideline to sideline speed and angle taking ability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [435]
TigerPulse: 92%
17
|
I think Clemson did have the better team..
2
Dec 1, 2024, 9:58 PM
|
|
Maybe not at every position. The better team doesn't always win
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2161]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Idiot on Radio
1
Dec 1, 2024, 10:08 PM
|
|
I mean is he really wrong… punter and rb are the only positions I would say they are clearly more talented
Qb- Clemson (not speaking of not making an adjustment and just letting a qb run, he didn’t make any meaningful throws)
Rb- Scar (mafah doesn’t look healthy but when healthy I’d say a wash)
OL- Clemson
DL- Clemson (if we are talking entire unit, Scar at DE)
Wr- Clemson
LB- Clemson ( lack depth but when coaches decide to let Sammy play those three aren’t close)
Secondary - honestly could be a wash, we have talent but one could argue scar may be better there I’m honestly not sure
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2161]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Idiot on Radio
1
Dec 1, 2024, 10:09 PM
|
|
Forgot TE bc we didn’t even use him lol but Clemson gets that too
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1609]
TigerPulse: 84%
31
|
Re: Idiot on Radio
Dec 1, 2024, 10:11 PM
[ in reply to Re: Idiot on Radio ] |
|
LOL. Okay bro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [465]
TigerPulse: 92%
18
|
Re: Idiot on Radio
Dec 1, 2024, 10:14 PM
[ in reply to Re: Idiot on Radio ] |
|
Which is exactly why we lost. We simply cannot win against solid competition unless we have inferior players. And 2025 is playing right into our plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [70774]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 20156
Joined: 2020
|
Re: Idiot on Radio
Dec 1, 2024, 10:42 PM
[ in reply to Re: Idiot on Radio ] |
|
I really think you are correct for the most part. I would add that coaching and adjustments matter.
I would add a caveat to your statement. Raw talent wise and roster wise, I totally agree. But experienced , developed talent can beat that raw talent. Louisville did. They have nowhere near our talent but they did add a lot of experienced talent through the portal.
I would also add, in south carolina case, it matters when week in and week out, you're playing against great talent in the sec... and you learn from doing. We've played weak talent and I really think that's one reason that a lot of pundits were picking scar.
I also add that smu has been playing that same weak talent as us and is why we will beat them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6476]
TigerPulse: 89%
40
|
Re: Idiot on Radio
Dec 1, 2024, 10:21 PM
|
|
I thought South Carolina looked like a better overall team. Which if you would have told me that in 2020 , that we’d lose 2 out of 3 and both home games to them I would have said your crazy.
Credit to Beamer, he adjusted (mainly out of necessity) quicker than Dabo as far as using all available options to build a team. You would think 15 years experience would have prevented that, but………
Not saying South Carolina is about to Alabama, but they have been to us the last 2 out of 3 years.
Long winter and Summer knowing our 2 biggest rivals shoved it up our rear ends when it didn’t have to be that way
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 11
| visibility 2407
|
|
|
50
