|
Replies: 31
| visibility 103
|
Paw Warrior [4931]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Coots final 4th or 5th in the SEC?
Jan 6, 2013, 5:27 PM
|
|
Trying to find on the web with not much luck. I show them tied for 4th with aTm. Any tie breaker since there's no head to head? Coot fans are quick to point out that they're 3rd in their division but I say live by being a conference homer, die by being one too. The NC game isn't relevant as win or lose Bama keeps their place.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-American [574]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Re: Coots final 4th or 5th in the SEC?
Jan 6, 2013, 5:29 PM
|
|
Who cares?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7011]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Coots final 4th or 5th in the SEC?
Jan 6, 2013, 5:32 PM
|
|
Pin oak leaf for their rings last year.
Lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6831]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
The Coots care, they have to decide whether to make....
Jan 6, 2013, 5:33 PM
[ in reply to Re: Coots final 4th or 5th in the SEC? ] |
|
...their rings out of plastic (5th place) or tin (4th place).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2846]
TigerPulse: 77%
33
|
So, 4 diamonds in the ring for 4th place, and 5 for 5th?***
Jan 6, 2013, 5:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [580]
TigerPulse: 25%
20
|
Re: Coots final 4th or 5th in the SEC?
Jan 6, 2013, 5:45 PM
|
|
2nd straight Top 10 class, probably matching last year's number 8 national ranking. When you play in a league with 6, possibly 7, Top 25 teams, you measure your program against the other 119 or so FBS schools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [580]
TigerPulse: 25%
20
|
"class"...meant "team".***
Jan 6, 2013, 5:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
yeah, we knew you didn't mean class, usuc hasn't got any.
Jan 6, 2013, 6:46 PM
|
|
and you HAVE GOT to place above 3rd in your div. before you start spouting off about national rankings in the polls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [556]
TigerPulse: 40%
20
|
Re: yeah, we knew you didn't mean class, usuc hasn't got any.
Jan 6, 2013, 8:39 PM
|
|
That makes no sense. Your ranking is your ranking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
you mean that esecpn influenced beauty contest that the
Jan 6, 2013, 8:49 PM
|
|
media's sports writers,aka journalism majors, that watches the weekends highlights and sports tickers, to base their top 25 votes on? if you think the west coast writers watch east coast games and east coast writers watch the west coast games,etc. ( for every top 25-30 team ) than you deserve the ridicule heaped on you by the majority of t-netters, and probably the smartest(?) of the usuc fans,as well!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [556]
TigerPulse: 40%
20
|
Re: you mean that esecpn influenced beauty contest that the
Jan 6, 2013, 9:02 PM
|
|
But I guess finishing 2nd in a division probably means your ranking counts? We went 11-2 with a fairly tough schedule. Our two losses were to highly ranked teams on their field. We beat two other highly ranked teams including one on their field. We deserve our ranking.
So if rankings are just subjective as opposed to objective division standings, are you actually suggesting yall had the better year based on finishing 2nd to our 3rd? When we had as many wins against a tougher schedule and beat you head to head on your field?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
i guess we lost to chopped liver! we lost to 2 decent teams,
Jan 6, 2013, 9:06 PM
|
|
not world-beaters, either one, but good, solid teams.
p.s. see my post below.
Message was edited by: sgt tiger®
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [580]
TigerPulse: 25%
20
|
Re: yeah, we knew you didn't mean class, usuc hasn't got any.
Jan 6, 2013, 8:52 PM
[ in reply to yeah, we knew you didn't mean class, usuc hasn't got any. ] |
|
Nice try ole boy. But you know it doesn't work that way. We will brag about our national ranking like we did last year because, it is, after all, the NATIONAL ranking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
you can't blame a guy for trying,though!
Jan 6, 2013, 8:59 PM
|
|
i'll accept our rank as well, i'll just figure out some reasons why we should be ranked higher!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2504]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [176]
TigerPulse: 27%
12
|
Well...
Jan 6, 2013, 6:56 PM
|
|
We have won the state championship by double digits 4 years in a row by defeating an ACC Coastal Champion, an overall ACC Champion and a 11 win ACC team the last 3 years. Don't think we are the ones that need to ####.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4931]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
This question wasn't about the ACC. Once again what breaks
Jan 6, 2013, 7:02 PM
|
|
the tie between the Gamecocks and Tex A&M? Conference records are the same. Overall W-L same. No head to head. Both only lost to Florida and LSU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11024]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
The Heisman**********
Jan 6, 2013, 7:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2466]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [556]
TigerPulse: 40%
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
and for 2 straight ( not sure of the previous 2) we have def
Jan 6, 2013, 9:04 PM
[ in reply to Well... ] |
|
-eated a team that beat y'all from the sec! so, your point is?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24894]
TigerPulse: 94%
54
Posts: 17252
Joined: 2002
|
Well...
Jan 6, 2013, 11:14 PM
[ in reply to Well... ] |
|
In your lifetime have you ever seen a conference championship ? If not, you never will.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [944]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: Coots final 4th or 5th in the SEC?
Jan 6, 2013, 6:05 PM
|
|
why do we continue to taunt a team that has owned us the last 4 years? I don't know where they finished in the sec least, however, I do know they beat the best team in the ACC on their home field.
Message was edited by: #1TIGER®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Whatever place it is they are is still insignificant...LOL***
Jan 6, 2013, 6:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4693]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
I still can't believe they won their division a few years back
Jan 6, 2013, 7:07 PM
|
|
Lulz, that'll never happen again
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [104989]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 99770
Joined: 2009
|
Tie breaker goes to the highest ranked team.
Jan 6, 2013, 7:37 PM
|
|
That's the way the bowl selection folks do it. More Fifth Place Ring being ordered?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1177]
TigerPulse: 49%
26
|
I'm pretty certain coots are #1 in SC ;-) *****
Jan 6, 2013, 8:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1584]
TigerPulse: 98%
30
|
Not unless they play and beat, PC, Newberry, SC State, etc***
Jan 6, 2013, 8:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junkie [590]
TigerPulse: 34%
20
|
Re: Not unless they play and beat, PC, Newberry, SC State, etc***
Jan 6, 2013, 11:07 PM
|
|
A&M lost both a home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4693]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
They'll probably finish 5th next year
Jan 6, 2013, 11:23 PM
|
|
In the SECleast
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11193]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 12191
Joined: 2003
|
WHO CARES???***
Jan 7, 2013, 8:36 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 31
| visibility 103
|
|
|
50
