Still comes down to coaching responsibility

Oct 17, 2021, 8:06 AM

I’m not really into bashing players because they are not in charge and are usually 18-21 year old boys that look like men physically. With that said, our “skilled” players are not looking very skiiled. From missing blocks (at the line and downfield) to poor footwork (DJ must be a horrible dancer) to undeveloped pass routes (take your pick- receiver or coaching) to the unimaginative play-calling (Tony or players not executing) it comes down down to who’s at fault organizationally? Leadership matters. Is Spiller a good running back coach? Is Grisham a good receiver coach? Is Elliott a good tight end coach? Is Lemanski Hall a good defensive end coach? Just because you were a good player does not mean you will be a good coach. Did we have such good talent that some of these coaches’ careers were made by it? If you’re responsible for recruiting the players and the players don’t work out, who is to blame? If I recuit and hire and train the skilled person, and the skilled person does not perform whose fault is that?

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

Still comes down to coaching responsibility

Re: Still comes down to coaching responsibility

TigerBoard POTD