Replies: 11
| visibility 1712
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46007
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: ESPN 'BCS-style' ranking has Clemson higher, updated ACC odds
1
Nov 14, 2024, 10:43 AM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7574]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
|
College Football and the Media is a joke. The BCS was invented when it was
1
Nov 14, 2024, 11:37 AM
|
|
for a reason
... then it was pulled out because the 4 team CFP was needed but people didn't see that at the time.
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7574]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
|
wish we could live in a world with both***
1
Nov 14, 2024, 11:37 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [61980]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62355
Joined: 2007
|
Re: College Football and the Media is a joke. The BCS was invented when it was
1
Nov 14, 2024, 3:28 PM
[ in reply to College Football and the Media is a joke. The BCS was invented when it was ] |
|
I agree but I really don't think that a 12 team playoff was the answer to get to a true National Champion. IMO, a 6 to 8 teams would have been a lot better without 1 of the 12 teams getting lucky toward the end of a season and adding 8 more teams does that...
|
|
|
|
 |
Athletic Dir [1175]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Re: TNET: ESPN 'BCS-style' ranking has Clemson higher, updated ACC odds
1
Nov 14, 2024, 11:46 AM
|
|
"Clemson's surprising shakiness on defense has most ACC coaches I've talked to choosing between Miami and SMU."
I can't remember the last time that defense was what was hurting the team. Maybe the orange bowl fiasco vs WV???
|
|
|
|
 |
Offensive Star [311]
TigerPulse: 100%
15
|
Re: TNET: ESPN 'BCS-style' ranking has Clemson higher, updated ACC odds
2
Nov 14, 2024, 11:59 AM
|
|
All I can say is GO ORANGE!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Offensive Star [345]
TigerPulse: 92%
15
|
Re: TNET: ESPN 'BCS-style' ranking has Clemson higher, updated ACC odds
1
Nov 14, 2024, 12:41 PM
|
|
I still don't get why no one addresses the fact that SMU has to play at Virginia. If SMU loses that game won't you have to go to the next tie breaker,
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [7005]
TigerPulse: 96%
41
|
No because unfortunately utilizing the tiebreakers Miami would win the 3 way tie
2
Nov 14, 2024, 1:47 PM
|
|
Then it would reset to a 2 way tie breaker with SMU. SMU would then win that because it goes by record vs common opponent in order of finish in the standings. Unless Louisville loses all of their remaining and UVA wins all of their remaining games, Louisville will be ahead of UVA in the standings. We would also lose a 2 way tie with Miami because of record against common opponent Louisville. Our best and easiest path would be for Miami to lose again.
I know im looking at it with orange glasses on, but I think the tiebreakers should be reversed. I think after record vs common opponents it should then go to combined win % of opponents and then if it is still tied record vs common opponents in order of finish. IMO SOS should trump order of finish. Currently, you are awarding a team that may have had the best win but at the same time they also had the worse loss.
|
|
|
|
 |
Standout [206]
TigerPulse: 75%
13
|
Re: TNET: ESPN 'BCS-style' ranking has Clemson higher, updated ACC odds
1
Nov 14, 2024, 2:18 PM
|
|
I have not researched this but if SMU loses to Va. how does that affect the outcome? Highest ranked team? Assuming we win out, I believe we outrank SMU. Just asking
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [7005]
TigerPulse: 96%
41
|
see above, I just posted the answer
1
Nov 14, 2024, 3:17 PM
|
|
Miami has to lose or Louisville has to lose out and UVA win out
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [61980]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62355
Joined: 2007
|
Re: see above, I just posted the answer
1
Nov 14, 2024, 3:36 PM
|
|
There is no such luck as UVA winning out bc it won't happen...
|
|
|
|
 |
Standout [226]
TigerPulse: 76%
13
|
Re: TNET: ESPN 'BCS-style' ranking has Clemson higher, updated ACC odds
Nov 16, 2024, 10:04 AM
|
|
They're ranked where they should be!! I'll give'um the loss with the jailhouse dogs, but Louisville is un--excusable, that was a defensive and offensive embarrassment.. So they have only meet 2 teams that gave them a game and they chocked on both!! Better luck next year boys!!
|
|
|
|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1712
|
|
|