|
Replies: 19
| visibility 3158
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46479
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Clemson placed highly in early 'way-too-early' rankings
6
6
Jan 16, 2025, 10:30 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [78055]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 120025
Joined: 1998
|
Re: TNET: Clemson placed highly in early 'way-too-early' rankings
5
5
Jan 16, 2025, 10:36 AM
|
|
lets get past the next portal window and see who is on what roster
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [9056]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
It is ON in 2025
3
Jan 16, 2025, 10:54 AM
|
|
And everyone knows it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62656]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62718
Joined: 2007
|
Re: It is ON in 2025
3
Jan 16, 2025, 12:05 PM
|
|
I believe that our offense is going to be a heavy load for our opponents this coming season with Klubnik throwing the ball to Williams, Wesco Jr, and TJ Moore as our wideouts. I wouldn't want to be the DC who has to figure out how to just slow that group down. Those 3 WRs is going to help whoever our starting RB will be to look great. They will have to pick their poison. Play the passing game and our RB will just have to pick his hole to run through, play the run and Klubnik, Williams, Wesco, and Moore are going eat them up. Call them the King Cobra line up!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [629]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
They can rank them wherever they want
5
5
Jan 16, 2025, 11:09 AM
|
|
as it's pointless right now, but Clemson will always be #1 in my book! GO TIGERS!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5418]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: TNET: Clemson placed highly in early 'way-too-early' rankings
10
10
Jan 16, 2025, 11:50 AM
|
|
No reason we shouldn't get Gameday to start the season if its a top 10 matchup
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [771]
TigerPulse: 92%
22
|
Re: TNET: Clemson placed highly in early 'way-too-early' rankings
4
Jan 16, 2025, 12:08 PM
|
|
GameDay? I want to see the days of orange crush or the power rangers. That's the days that I want to see. Defense win championships. Go Tigers!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5418]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: TNET: Clemson placed highly in early 'way-too-early' rankings
1
Jan 16, 2025, 1:50 PM
|
|
Yes Gameday and yes it's possible to have both. Parker, Woods, Capehart, and Heldt with Brown taking over at LB will hopefully be another version of those names.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62656]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62718
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1395]
TigerPulse: 96%
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2379]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: TNET: Clemson placed highly in early 'way-too-early' rankings
4
Jan 16, 2025, 12:15 PM
|
|
This list is flawed...USUC at 12th?...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62656]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62718
Joined: 2007
|
Re: TNET: Clemson placed highly in early 'way-too-early' rankings
3
Jan 16, 2025, 12:20 PM
|
|
If you ever keep up with what the coots are doing with the portal and the last couple to few years of recruiting, I think then you may see how they could be 12th. Beamer is using his last name to help him get some decent talent to come in there to play FB. Will it last, probably not but it's working for him now especially with them being in the SEC!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62438]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 18193
Joined: 2020
|
Re: TNET: Clemson placed highly in early 'way-too-early' rankings
5
5
Jan 16, 2025, 12:34 PM
|
|
Agree. Also agree this is fun but meaningless as others have said. Look at how tough our schedule looked last year... GameDay for a top 10 showdown with fsu.
One thing is for certain. Kelly won't survive another beatdown up here. Which, imo is what he'll get. Our D will be ready, and it's going to be so tasty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [633]
TigerPulse: 51%
21
|
Re: TNET: Clemson placed highly in early 'way-too-early' rankings
1
Jan 16, 2025, 3:27 PM
|
|
"Projected Top 7", that's a new one for me
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4813]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: TNET: Clemson placed highly in early 'way-too-early' rankings
1
Jan 16, 2025, 5:00 PM
|
|
South Carolina came into the season underrated this year. Due to this one 9 win season they’re going to come into next season overrated. It’s almost like the voters don’t realize how much they lose on that defense. South Carolina has not been known as a program that replaces that kind of talent. Sellers looked very average without rocket Sanders. That offensive coordinator didn’t look too great either. I see that defense taking a huge step back and they’ll be back to a 6-6 season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4509]
TigerPulse: 99%
36
|
They need to get rid of that top 4 bye, add 4 slots
1
Jan 16, 2025, 5:00 PM
|
|
Teams that had that extra week, was like over a month before they actually played and they all played like shiet. All lost.
So add 4 teams, so that math works and everybody starts at the same time.
Or, reduce to eight, they will never do that …
Message was edited by: OhWiseOne®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [847]
TigerPulse: 99%
23
|
Re: TNET: Clemson placed highly in early 'way-too-early' rankings
1
Jan 16, 2025, 9:08 PM
|
|
Texas ranked #1? For what they lost Golden at WR and Ewers at QB Manning is a bust
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [519]
TigerPulse: 94%
19
|
Re: TNET: Clemson placed highly in early 'way-too-early' rankings
Jan 17, 2025, 9:33 AM
|
|
Manning a “bust”……you’re basing this on…..????????????????????
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [519]
TigerPulse: 94%
19
|
Re: TNET: Clemson placed highly in early 'way-too-early' rankings
Jan 17, 2025, 9:35 AM
|
|
The fact we couldn’t land him….?????????
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1011]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: TNET: Clemson placed highly in early 'way-too-early' rankings
1
Jan 16, 2025, 9:28 PM
|
|
My first reaction is “rat poison” but Dabo will keep his team grounded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 19
| visibility 3158
|
|
|
50
