Replies: 14
| visibility 3160
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46007
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Practice notes: Kicking competition is back-and-forth
3
Aug 8, 2024, 3:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [76567]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 119362
Joined: 1998
|
Re: TNET: Practice notes: Kicking competition is back-and-forth
3
Aug 8, 2024, 3:37 PM
|
|
kickers probably need a better holder (ok I'm kidding)
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Sports Icon [59973]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 17666
Joined: 2020
|
Re: TNET: Practice notes: Kicking competition is back-and-forth
3
Aug 8, 2024, 4:05 PM
|
|
Got ya!!! Congratulations on 70k. Now we got to get you to 74. 😆
Some strange reason I can't TU this post.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6889]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: TNET: Practice notes: Kicking competition is back-and-forth
4
Aug 8, 2024, 4:10 PM
|
|
Super happy walker is back, hope he can get to where he needs to be for UGA. Don't really care who wins FG position, just need someone very dependable.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14523]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
|
They are right there together but the $100,000 question is
6
6
Aug 8, 2024, 4:16 PM
|
|
are they both deadly accurate right now or is it that both couldn't kick the ball into the ocean off a pier. Inquiring minds want to know!
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Conqueror [11982]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 14512
Joined: 2014
|
Re: They are right there together but the $100,000 question is
5
5
Aug 8, 2024, 4:38 PM
|
|
Exactly what I'm thinking. Is Dabo just saying this to make sure neither loses their confidence, or are both of them inconsistent? One or the other has to be much better than what we saw last year.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14363]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 23502
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
 |
Walk-On [77]
TigerPulse: 94%
8
|
Re: TNET: Practice notes: Kicking competition is back-and-forth
1
Aug 8, 2024, 6:03 PM
|
|
Uh, Gunn was always spot on in practices last year, then collapsed in games. Now it appears he can't distance himself in practice either. Looks like we're in store for another year of a lackluster kicking game.
|
|
|
|
 |
Asst Coach [805]
TigerPulse: 95%
23
|
Re: TNET: Practice notes: Kicking competition is back-and-forth
Aug 8, 2024, 7:22 PM
|
|
What a bunch this is. GO TIGERS
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [10721]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: TNET: Practice notes: Kicking competition is back-and-forth
1
Aug 8, 2024, 8:18 PM
|
|
I'm more concerned with gaining field position on both sides of the ball. This means a kick receiving team that can return punts and kick offs that puts the offense in a better position to score on each drive. This also includes a punt and kicking team that can pin opponents deep for Clemson's hungry defense that wants to be able to pin their ears back and wreak havoc.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6745]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: TNET: Practice notes: Kicking competition is back-and-forth
1
Aug 8, 2024, 8:25 PM
|
|
Dabo decided a long time ago he doesn’t want more than 5-10 yards in punt returns as long as we catch it. Never rushes the kicker (other than early last year when we blocked a kick and didn’t rush anybody later in the year) which leads to punters having career days against us. Kickoff returns depend entirely on how deep the other guy kicks it and the wind.
|
|
|
|
 |
Starter [282]
TigerPulse: 99%
14
|
Re: TNET: Practice notes: Kicking competition is back-and-forth
Aug 8, 2024, 9:16 PM
|
|
Two scholarship kickers and neither one can prove to be a reliable option great…
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8865]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 11749
Joined: 2011
|
Re: TNET: Practice notes: Kicking competition is back-and-forth
Aug 9, 2024, 12:28 AM
|
|
Do we know that the FG kickers are not performing well in practice? I didn't hear Dabo say that. You guys are assuming the worst. I'll wait and see. Or wait and hear/read .
And if we score TDs, we might not need a FG kicker
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [5893]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: TNET: Practice notes: Kicking competition is back-and-forth
Aug 9, 2024, 12:16 PM
|
|
If history has any bearing, we need a FG kicker against UGA.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2444]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 3160
|
|
|