|
Replies: 19
| visibility 4316
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 45373
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: National analysts predict Clemson-South Carolina game
2
Nov 28, 2024, 9:53 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Standout [233]
TigerPulse: 98%
13
|
Re: TNET: National analysts predict Clemson-South Carolina game
3
Nov 28, 2024, 10:12 AM
|
|
My analysis is Clemson 31 - So Car 20!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [9028]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 10701
Joined: 2003
|
Their schedule was tougher, but not sure I would call
4
Nov 28, 2024, 10:18 AM
|
|
any of their opponents ELITE!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1911]
TigerPulse: 83%
31
|
Re: Their schedule was tougher, but not sure I would call
4
Nov 28, 2024, 11:53 AM
|
|
They talk about playing very close with Bama and LSU? Both of those teams are not what they have been. Now South Carolina is very much improved and could win this game, but I believe with what is at stake, the Tigers will prevail 27-23. I think Selkars will make 1 more mistake than Cade. We will struggle to run, but Mafah will have 75 very critical yards on the ground. Cade throws for 265. We get a short field on a big turnover and that's the difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1298]
TigerPulse: 55%
27
|
Re: Their schedule was tougher, but not sure I would call
Nov 29, 2024, 4:43 PM
|
|
I got 2 pick 6s for Tigers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11957]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Nice picture; if you MUST shake hands with a gamecrack thats the way to do it
2
Nov 28, 2024, 10:21 AM
|
|
but also have some Purrel ready for afterwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28666]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 15991
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Nice picture; if you MUST shake hands with a gamecrack thats the way to do it
2
Nov 28, 2024, 11:22 AM
|
|
|
|
Nah this Pic will always be funny....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2248]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [60106]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 61423
Joined: 2007
|
Re: TNET: National analysts predict Clemson-South Carolina game
4
Nov 28, 2024, 11:40 AM
|
|
This will be one of the most important games that Clemson and the coots have played in a very long time when speaking about what's on the line for both teams, this is the type of game that a rivalry should be at least 3 out of every 5 years. Personally, I can't remember the last time this game has been so important for both teams, it will be, or it should be a barn burner in Death Valley starting at noon this coming Saturday...
One thing that I believe should be said, if you are, or you claim to be a Tiger fan, if you sell your tickets to a coot, you have just as much coot blood running through your veins as the coot you sold your ticket-tickets to, you are one of the same!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10756]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Crawford is a Coot grad
3
Nov 28, 2024, 11:48 AM
|
|
His pick is pure Homer
He’d pick them if they played the Detroit Lions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23221]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14104
Joined: 2013
|
And Dennis Dodd did not pick us.
1
Nov 28, 2024, 5:29 PM
|
|
Shocking. THAT GUY LOVES EVERYTHING CLEMSON AND DABO!!!
🙄🙄🙄
~JKB
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21001]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 12735
Joined: 2018
|
Re: TNET: National analysts predict Clemson-South Carolina game
3
Nov 28, 2024, 12:17 PM
|
|
About as close as it gets. Maybe last possession wins. A lot riding on the outcome for both teams. We really need this one!
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [50639]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 14859
Joined: 2012
|
We are the Clemson Tigers playing in Death Valley ready to Win
2
Nov 29, 2024, 8:24 AM
|
|
|
|
You can’t win anything with fear, this team has been so dominant all season and even the game we lost to Louisville we spanked them on the line of scrimmage.
We totally blew this game but dominated play.
The Pitt game on the road where we lost our 2nd string left tackle on the 1st play after already being down 4 offensive linemen was an amazing performance and why we didn’t run much because we were in prevent injury mode the whole game(we gutted out a game not many power 4 teams could with our best LB was out and we lost Sammy Brown to a tough call targeting.
We will have three of our Offensive line guys back for this game, I hope they are healthy enough to play like we can.
This team will win big if we play well and we have some pieces back on the OL. We aren’t at full strength but we are more than capable of running away with this game.
Scoring early and often will be the key for us, look for those slants we haven’t shown all season.
We definitely have the better team when healthy, the best coach, now it’s up to the kids to dominate as we swing for the playoffs!
Let’s get behind our Tigers with some faith they deserve!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [318]
TigerPulse: 68%
15
|
Re: TNET: National analysts predict Clemson-South Carolina game
1
Nov 5, 2023, 7:12 PM
|
|
This Clemson team, like the teams of the last four years is soft. We get pushed around at the line of scrimmage on both sides. This has little to do with SEC schedule vs ACC schedule. What it has to do with is the talent level on each team and the colts have more. They’ve recruited better, kicking our ### with in state prospects and tomorrow is the day clemson fans everywhere should be dreading. It’s the day the final nail gets put in our coffin as far as if we are relevant any longer. We aren’t and when the colts come in to Death Valley, with a state championship on the line and a shot at the cfp going to the winner, that mayonnaise eating moron is going to be acting like an ### as he watches the gamecocks beat the #### out the tigers. This game is not only not going to go the tigers way it’s going to get ugly fast. Tomorrow the gamecocks are going to make us the little brother and show recruits who the beast of the state is. Trust me when I say this. It isn’t us!!!!! ##### by ninety
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [640]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Re: TNET: National analysts predict Clemson-South Carolina game
Nov 29, 2024, 10:06 PM
|
|
Bullchit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [318]
TigerPulse: 68%
15
|
Re: TNET: National analysts predict Clemson-South Carolina game
Nov 30, 2024, 6:49 AM
|
|
Really?? Since the changes in the portal and the introduction of NIL which team in the state is trending up which one is trending down? I’m an alum, I love the Tigers but I’m also a realist. We struggled with VT, we should’ve lost to Pitt. How the #### is it possible that we’ve had six or seven field goals blocked this season and we cannot figure out how to fix that?? Six blocked field goals and a blocked extra point and we can’t figure that out? That’s bad news bears kind of stuff. Let’s see today how many times our defensive coordinator gets screamed at on the sidelines by Dabo because that genius will have at least two or three big plays where someone from Carolina doesn’t have a Clemson defender within twenty yards of him? We’ve grown spoiled because of the run from 2015-2020 but cmon. If you take the 11 other playoff teams and add them together they don’t have as many blocked kicks as we do?? You’re angry because I’m right. Sorry to ruin your day
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [487]
TigerPulse: 97%
18
|
Re: TNET: National analysts predict Clemson-South Carolina game
Nov 30, 2024, 9:31 AM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: National analysts predict Clemson-South Carolina game ] |
|
I like how you said “us” like you aren’t a chicken fan lol. Carolina hasn’t kicked out butt in anything in 10 years, the what are you even talking about?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [318]
TigerPulse: 68%
15
|
Re: TNET: National analysts predict Clemson-South Carolina game
Nov 30, 2024, 3:39 PM
|
|
I’m not a coot fan moron I’m an alumni my wife is and my daughter got her y set grad degree and is still there earning a PhD. So I’m sure I’m far more of a Clemson man than you’ll ever be. Having an opinion that isn’t all rainbows and unicorns sets me up to o be a coots fan?? Klubnik stinks. Period. The last three drives we had the ball, Klubnik overthrows an open receiver on 3rd down that would’ve gone for six. Next series on 3rd and 6 as he continues to do far more often than a third year qb should, he chooses that high percentage 40 yard pass down the sideline when the receiver was covered and wasn’t even close coasting the ball because even he knew e was a decoy. Then the final drive with 16 seconds left and one timeout Cade is outside the pocket and can simply throw it away so we get another shot at the end zone. Not our Cade. He figures a three yard pass to our lead footed RB who would’ve been tackled immediately well short of a first down forcing Clemson to call its last time out. Not only does he make a horrible decision to throw it but he throws the ball well behind him and it ends up in the hands of the gamecocks. It will go down as the play that officially ended Clemson football as a relevant national powerhouse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [640]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Re: TNET: National analysts predict Clemson-South Carolina game
Nov 29, 2024, 9:35 PM
|
|
Who gives a crap what these people think. Have faith in the Paw, if the offensive line is patched up enough to give Cade a few seconds and make running lanes for Phil we will be ok. The defense will do fine if Woodaz is healthy. Hopefully we use a 3-4 front and contain Sellars. Tigers 28 usuc 20
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [640]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Re: TNET: National analysts predict Clemson-South Carolina game
Nov 29, 2024, 9:35 PM
|
|
Who gives a crap what these people think. Have faith in the Paw, if the offensive line is patched up enough to give Cade a few seconds and make running lanes for Phil we will be ok. The defense will do fine if Woodaz is healthy. Hopefully we use a 3-4 front and contain Sellars. Tigers 28 usuc 20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 19
| visibility 4316
|
|
|
50
