|
Replies: 56
| visibility 1522
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46476
Joined: 2012
|
FB Update: Bowl Projections for Clemson
Dec 3, 2014, 11:30 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Elite [5418]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: FB Update: Bowl Projections for Clemson
Dec 3, 2014, 11:31 AM
|
|
I wouldn't mind this matchup at all if the Orange Bowl is out of the question(its a long shot).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [706]
TigerPulse: 100%
22
|
Re: FB Update: Bowl Projections for Clemson
Dec 3, 2014, 11:33 AM
|
|
I'd love to take on any SEC team right now. Bring it on
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [69]
TigerPulse: 98%
7
|
Quality opponent
Dec 3, 2014, 11:43 AM
|
|
Any of those matchups are good. All you can ask for is an opponent where it would be a significant win if you win. ##### vs. Cincinnati, not so much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [567]
TigerPulse: 94%
20
|
Re: Quality opponent
Dec 3, 2014, 11:50 AM
|
|
If we beat mizz do you get SEC east championship rings???
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [78915]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 20543
Joined: 2008
|
No- but if we lose , the chickens will be
Dec 3, 2014, 12:23 PM
|
|
claiming "6 in a row".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [972]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: No- but if we lose , the chickens will be
Dec 3, 2014, 12:33 PM
|
|
How? They lost to Missouri.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16990]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 21895
Joined: 2007
|
Re: No- but if we lose , the chickens will be
Dec 3, 2014, 2:31 PM
|
|
Granted, but they claim all secheat successes to be their win, as well. It's just the way they try to include themselves in the elite of that conference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3881]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Birmingham is one of the great bowl destinations, haven't
Dec 3, 2014, 12:37 PM
[ in reply to Quality opponent ] |
|
you heard
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16990]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 21895
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Quality opponent
Dec 3, 2014, 7:57 PM
[ in reply to Quality opponent ] |
|
Rarely do they have a quality opponent. When they do, outside the previous few years (and now that ship has been righted), they have failed epically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [80]
TigerPulse: 85%
9
|
Re: FB Update: Bowl Projections for Clemson
Dec 3, 2014, 11:34 AM
|
|
Citrus would be awesome but i'm not sure how i like their front 7 being able to handle our o-line and get to an injured watson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [21]
TigerPulse: 87%
3
|
Re: FB Update: Bowl Projections for Clemson
Dec 3, 2014, 11:39 AM
|
|
I would welcome Ole Miss but Mizzo's D line my be too much for our O line to handle
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: FB Update: Bowl Projections for Clemson
Dec 4, 2014, 10:10 PM
|
|
If scars pitiful lazy OL took em to 4 qtr then we could beat em by 3 tds
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [48072]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
|
Re: FB Update: Bowl Projections for Clemson
Dec 3, 2014, 11:53 AM
|
|
The Citrus Bowl is a higher rated bowl than the Russell Athletic Bowl, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1929]
TigerPulse: 91%
31
|
Re: FB Update: Bowl Projections for Clemson
Dec 3, 2014, 11:55 AM
|
|
Yes, much larger payout. I think this is our best option since Orange Bowl looks like it's out of reach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [99]
TigerPulse: null%
10
|
Re: FB Update: Bowl Projections for Clemson
Dec 3, 2014, 9:59 PM
|
|
I Agree I Had Rather Play In The Citrus Bowl Worth A Lot More Money Coming To Clemson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [240]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
Re: FB Update: Bowl Projections for Clemson
Dec 3, 2014, 10:34 PM
[ in reply to Re: FB Update: Bowl Projections for Clemson ] |
|
And keep in mind that the Citrus Bowl just finished its renovations last month so it's basically brand new all over again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [645]
TigerPulse: 95%
21
|
Re: FB Update: Bowl Projections for Clemson
Dec 4, 2014, 8:37 AM
|
|
It would be like deja vu all over again....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5367]
TigerPulse: 88%
38
|
Re: FB Update: Bowl Projections for Clemson
Dec 3, 2014, 11:55 AM
|
|
Honestly not real excited about either of those opponents...
I want one of those fckers from the Pac-12 or Big 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28802]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 58393
Joined: 2003
|
That's a boring game. I want Mississippi State
Dec 3, 2014, 12:12 PM
|
|
I doubt many will give us credit for beating Missouri in that game, and their good defense and bad offense could make for another boring game.
The Oklahoma matchup in the Russell Bowl sounds a lot more interesting.
Message was edited by: camcgee®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1083]
TigerPulse: 94%
25
|
Clemson to the Russell if Bama or FSU fall out of the top 4
Dec 3, 2014, 12:20 PM
|
|
Otherwise it is the Citrus
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18901]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 13655
Joined: 2003
|
Now this is simplified. +1 Buffalo***
Dec 3, 2014, 1:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8185]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 16058
Joined: 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1083]
TigerPulse: 94%
25
|
Clemson to the Russell if Bama falls out of the top 4
Dec 3, 2014, 4:34 PM
|
|
Otherwise it is the Citrus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1038]
TigerPulse: 36%
25
|
Is Deshaun going to play in the bowl? If not, zero chance
Dec 3, 2014, 1:32 PM
|
|
of beating any SEC team, or almost any team for that matter...other than ACC bottom feeders like Syracuse and Wake Forest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2184]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Is Deshaun going to play in the bowl? If not, zero chance
Dec 3, 2014, 1:49 PM
|
|
Sadly, this is a correct statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 16363
Joined: 1998
|
... or #21 Louisville ... remember, defense wins games.***
Dec 3, 2014, 3:37 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14548]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 23625
Joined: 2004
|
Relying on a punt return TD and defensive TD to
Dec 3, 2014, 8:03 PM
|
|
pull out a win isn't a good formula for success. Also, i think Cole has regressed even further since that game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4506]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
So we shouldn't count those TDs just because Cole was
Dec 3, 2014, 9:27 PM
|
|
playing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16181]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [0]
TigerPulse: 50%
1
|
Re: Totally agree!
Dec 7, 2014, 11:45 AM
|
|
Injuries are never an excuse to lose and only losers make excuses.....FSU could have made an excuse prior to the Clemson game because FSU went into that game WITHOUT their best player and Heisman-winning QB Jameis Winston, yet they still won the game rather convincingly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [9]
TigerPulse: 67%
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [10]
TigerPulse: 5%
2
|
Re: Is Deshaun going to play in the bowl? If not, zero chance
Dec 3, 2014, 10:18 PM
|
|
I agree. Who are we kidding. Cole Stoudt is a train wreck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [85]
TigerPulse: 64%
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [85]
TigerPulse: 64%
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [216]
TigerPulse: 97%
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4806]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Not a huge fan of the Russell Athletic Bowl prediction, tho
Dec 3, 2014, 2:16 PM
|
|
playing a team like Oklahoma or K-State would soften the blow considerably.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9993]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Disagree
Dec 3, 2014, 2:20 PM
|
|
Russell is now a more highly selected and paying bowl than it has been in the past, and the Citrus Bowl just got a $207 million dollar renovation.
2013 - Louisville v Miami
2012 - FSU v ND
This game is now attracting a much better matchup, and playing Oklahoma or K State would be fun
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1482]
TigerPulse: 95%
29
|
Re: FB Update: Bowl Projections for Clemson
Dec 3, 2014, 2:22 PM
|
|
The writer also thinks Baylor will be in the playoff.
Not unless they absolutely eat Kansas State this weekend and TCU screws up with Iowa State, which probably isn't going to happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2627]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
ok..listen up...Baylor throttles Kst...GaTech beats FSU
Dec 3, 2014, 2:38 PM
|
|
TCU kills Iowa St ....
Baylor jumps Oh St who will struggle in their ch game.
Ga Tech to Orange
FSU to Citrus
Clemson to Russell vs Oklahoma
You can thank me later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [9000]
TigerPulse: 97%
43
|
Ga Tech
Dec 3, 2014, 3:24 PM
|
|
Don't let Walt fool you. Tech is garbage. The only reason we lost was, well, Cole Stoudt. The game will be close because FSU plays EVERYONE close, but make no mistake, they will win the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [283]
TigerPulse: 93%
14
|
Re: Ga Tech
Dec 3, 2014, 4:27 PM
|
|
Nah
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [4]
TigerPulse: 50%
1
|
Re: Ga Tech
Dec 4, 2014, 12:31 AM
[ in reply to Ga Tech ] |
|
> Don't let Walt fool you. Tech is garbage. The only
> reason we lost was, well, Cole Stoudt. The game will
> be close because FSU plays EVERYONE close, but make
> no mistake, they will win the game.
Geeze, didnt we also beat #9 UGA in Athens the very next game? Seems like GT should get *some* credit here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [0]
TigerPulse: 50%
1
|
Re: Ga Tech
Dec 7, 2014, 11:18 AM
[ in reply to Ga Tech ] |
|
Tech is not garbage - they nearly beat FSU and only lost 37 - 35 and they played FSU with their best player Jameis Winston. Remember FSU beat Clemson by a TD with their third-string QB(Jameis was suspended for that game ).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [0]
TigerPulse: 50%
1
|
Re: Ga Tech
Dec 7, 2014, 11:34 AM
[ in reply to Ga Tech ] |
|
When FSU beat Clemson, don't forget FSU was playing with their 3rd string QB Sean McGuirre who is a terrible quarterback, yet they beat Clemson quite convincingly. So u must give GaTech a lot of credit because they nearly won last night against FSU and a 100% healthy Jameis Winston. Remember when Jameis Winston last played against Clemson, the final score was FSU 51 Clemson 7.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2355]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Ga Tech
Dec 7, 2014, 11:40 AM
|
|
Quite convincingly? A TD in OT? We missed 2 FGs, a wide open TD because of Stoudt, fumbled on the 5, etc. what game were u watching? And Winston is playing horrible right now. How many INTs does he have? I wish we had another shot at them.
Yeah we lost. But you got to get out of here with that "we lost quite convincingly crap."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [0]
TigerPulse: 50%
1
|
Re: Ga Tech
Dec 7, 2014, 11:57 AM
|
|
When I said "convincingly" I meant FSU beat Clemson when FSU was playing with their 3rd-string QB Sean McGuirre who is lot more worse than even Cole Stoudt. So if Jameis Winston had played in that game as he did in last year's game, FSU probably would have won by the same score as last year when FSU routed Clemson 51 - 7. Losing by six points in this year's game is a convincing win for FSU due to the fact they were severely short handed with an awful QB like Sean McGuirre.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16990]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 21895
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Ga Tech
Dec 13, 2014, 10:24 PM
[ in reply to Re: Ga Tech ] |
|
No way he really watched the game, and/or he must be a coot or at the least an FSU or a GT homer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8185]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 16058
Joined: 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16128]
TigerPulse: 97%
51
Posts: 24632
Joined: 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
46
Posts: 14500
Joined: 2011
|
I think Clemson would destroy Mizzu
Dec 3, 2014, 4:38 PM
|
|
Mizzu struggles on offense and vs that #1 defense? Now that changes if Stoudt plays of course. I think 31-13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [240]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
Re: I think Clemson would destroy Mizzu
Dec 3, 2014, 10:38 PM
|
|
I'll give Cole the benefit of the doubt in this situation. Giving his shoulder time to heal and wanting to do well enough to be invited to the combine i think Mr. Thanksgiving could be decent enough for us to win a bowl game without needing to play Watson. My belief is that Watson is only there in case he's needed but i don't expect him to play in the bowl game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [216]
TigerPulse: 97%
13
|
Doldrums
Dec 3, 2014, 11:04 PM
|
|
Don't know about y'all, but the doldrums are about to begin. The time between football seasons is brutal. How about 40 game year round season? Who's in?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [216]
TigerPulse: 97%
13
|
Re: Doldrums
Dec 4, 2014, 11:40 AM
|
|
I'd really rather have a 52 game season but didn't want to get greedy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1149]
TigerPulse: 97%
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [103]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: I think Clemson would destroy Mizzu
Dec 4, 2014, 6:26 PM
[ in reply to Re: I think Clemson would destroy Mizzu ] |
|
Sorry buddy...but stoudt could throw for 500 yards and 5 TDs and he wouldn't even get thought about for the NFL combine. Was that a serious statement? I sure hope not. Cole stoudt would be benched playing qb for Lexington high school. He never deserved to put a Clemson uniform on to begin with. That kid is the worst qb in the entire world. He had to be playing so badly on purpose, cuz if he is really that bad, then be should be a qb coach, and kids should do the exact opposite of him. Thanks to cole stoudt, a great defense was wasted this year, a 9-3 record instead of a chance for an acc championship, cuz he can't complete a 5 yard pass to legget that probably would have won he FSU game. That's how bad this guy is. Its just as much dabos fault for playing this moron. I mean, cole stoudt, really? Great evaluation if talent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [840]
TigerPulse: 83%
23
|
Re: FB Update: Bowl Projections for Clemson
Dec 4, 2014, 7:00 AM
|
|
So its USuCk to the Bourbon bowl...nice !!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 56
| visibility 1522
|
|
|
50
