|
Replies: 25
| visibility 100
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 45049
Joined: 2012
|
FB Update: ESPN analyst releases his CFB Top 25 rankings
Apr 1, 2016, 11:57 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Sports Icon [58891]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 23216
Joined: 2005
|
Miami #13?
Apr 1, 2016, 12:01 PM
|
|
Schad smokin that good ####
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6259]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: Miami #13?
Apr 1, 2016, 12:03 PM
|
|
Yeah, I don't understand that for a second. I also don't understand FSU at #2 until they have a proven QB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3788]
TigerPulse: 99%
35
|
Texas ahead of Baylor and TCU? LOL***
Apr 1, 2016, 12:30 PM
[ in reply to Miami #13? ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13855]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 23084
Joined: 2004
|
I think TCU is losing a lot this year and could drop off
Apr 1, 2016, 1:36 PM
|
|
substantially, but Briles has Baylor at a point where he can just plug in guys and win 10-11 games a year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3788]
TigerPulse: 99%
35
|
Yeah nevermind about TCU
Apr 4, 2016, 2:03 PM
|
|
I just looked at their starting OL from last year, 4 seniors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2507]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Does FSU even know who their QB is going to be?***
Apr 1, 2016, 12:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [86129]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 81100
Joined: 1999
|
I wish they would settle in on McGuire. My fear is that
Apr 1, 2016, 12:11 PM
|
|
one of their young guys who are very mobile, plays out of this world and wins the job.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [67583]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 89959
Joined: 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6259]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: You don't need a great QB just to hand the ball to Cook
Apr 1, 2016, 2:37 PM
|
|
You still need a competent QB when there are 8 guys in the box stuffing the run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6886]
TigerPulse: 99%
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [73514]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 117794
Joined: 1998
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst releases his CFB Top 25 rankings
Apr 1, 2016, 12:09 PM
|
|
I didnt realize he was even still w ESPN. Seems he has been majorly demoted versus his stature of years ago. I never thought he was very good. Maybe its April fool as he never was very good
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1310]
TigerPulse: 97%
28
|
What a joke
Apr 1, 2016, 12:13 PM
|
|
First FSU is a top 10 team but has way to many questions esp at QB to be ahead of us at 2. SEC completely way overrated throughout again. I don't have a problem w Bamas spot but LSU at 4?? Tennessee at 9?? UGA at 11??!!!! Florida at 15????? Texas AM ranked at all??? Ole Miss should be higher in rankings. As much as I hate them UNC should be much higher and will be good. Louisville should be in top 25 and Miami shouldn't even be ranked. Neither should Texas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [67583]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 89959
Joined: 2001
|
UNC should be much higher ?
Apr 1, 2016, 12:15 PM
|
|
On what basis?
They have some key losses that will be difficult to overcome including QB Marquise Williams, WR Quinshad Davis, and several others on defense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13855]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 23084
Joined: 2004
|
Honestly, there's no reason Tenn shouldn't be a top 10 or 15
Apr 1, 2016, 1:46 PM
[ in reply to What a joke ] |
|
team this year aside from the fact that Butch Jones seems to be an idiot. With their returning talent, I really think this is Tenn's year to win the division with Richt out at UGA and the way Florida finished the year last year + their QB situation. If they don't win 10 games they should just go ahead and get rid of Butch Jones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [283]
TigerPulse: 93%
14
|
Funny
Apr 1, 2016, 12:17 PM
|
|
how everyone gets so wound up over these rankings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2094]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Is Oklahoma returning all 22 of their starters?
Apr 1, 2016, 12:20 PM
|
|
Are they getting the benefit of their tradition?
They are consistently ranked very high in all of the preseason polls!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1197]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Re: Is Oklahoma returning all 22 of their starters?
Apr 1, 2016, 12:25 PM
|
|
They are consistent
Consistently curb stomped by our tigers
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1571]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
check his top 25 last year and tell me
Apr 1, 2016, 12:30 PM
|
|
if you would take him seriously or laugh at him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13855]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 23084
Joined: 2004
|
I'm not really a fan of Schad, but i think if internet
Apr 1, 2016, 1:39 PM
|
|
posters did pre-season top 25s every year we would probably look back and laugh at almost all of them too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1635]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
So Clemson and LSU would not play in their conference
Apr 1, 2016, 12:32 PM
|
|
champions (because AL and FSU would be the division champ and assumed conf champ) but yet still make playoff? interesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [401]
TigerPulse: 100%
17
|
Re: So Clemson and LSU would not play in their conference
Apr 1, 2016, 1:24 PM
|
|
Can you say that Schad is an idiot (typical for any ESPN reporter not named Herbstreet and even he has mental lapses at times)? It would be next to impossible for a 1-loss ACC team that does not win the championship to get into the playoff. Not today at least. I guess the ACC can show its stuff if Miami, UNC, Florida State, and Clemson lose ONLY to each other and no one else, and then I guess it is possible, but that is not going to happen. LSU certainly could get in if their only loss is to Bama. But, let's not worry about that. Clemson can, and should, go undefeated again this year. You can read it in what Dabo is saying (or better yet, what he is not saying) this spring. You can read it in what the players are saying and doing (such as Deon and Christian). Quiet confidence. Nobody thought last year was the year. Everybody knows (and has known for several years) that THIS is the year. And, with Mike coming back, it is only better. Yes, I wish we had not lost some of the defense, but I am not worried. And, with the offense we have this year, we might not need a punter. I don't see many 3-and-outs. As long as Dabo fixes kickoff coverage and gets better in the return game, Clemson will be #1 or #2 going into the playoff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [401]
TigerPulse: 100%
17
|
Re: So Clemson and LSU would not play in their conference
Apr 1, 2016, 1:26 PM
[ in reply to So Clemson and LSU would not play in their conference ] |
|
And, to be fair to Schad (I really don't want to be), the article does seem to imply that it is based on returning starter numbers and 5-year recruiting records. But, if that made a championship team, then where would we have been last year with all the non-returning starters on defense? #20?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59584]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 60994
Joined: 2007
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst releases his CFB Top 25 rankings
Apr 1, 2016, 2:04 PM
|
|
It wouldn't matter if we had returned our complete 2015 team, esecpn would dare place Clemson as the #1 team headed into the 2016 season. For us Tiger nation worry or sweat anything that esecpn says, it makes as much sense as anything they come up with or say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4493]
TigerPulse: 61%
36
|
How in the world is FSU ahead of us? They got killed
Apr 1, 2016, 3:26 PM
|
|
in their bowl game and not to mention we beat them as well!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1467]
TigerPulse: 97%
29
|
Obviously uninformed, doesnt have chickens in top 10!!!
Apr 1, 2016, 8:40 PM
|
|
ct
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 25
| visibility 100
|
|
|
50
