Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Wednesday's Game: Clemson at Maryland
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 14
| visibility 1,656

Wednesday's Game: Clemson at Maryland


Feb 23, 2010, 9:59 AM

Bump with the spread added

Who: Clemson (19-7, 7-5 ACC) at Maryland (19-7, 9-3)
When: Wednesday, 9 p.mp. in the Comcast Center
Is it on TV? It's on Raycom, if you can pull yourself away from ice dancing.

My eyes! My eyes!
When Last We Met: An ugly, UGLY game won by the Tigers in Littlejohn. We're talking hot tub date with Kathy Bates ugly. No Stitt, flu-riddled Trevor Booker misses his first 12 shots and still the Tigers prevailed.
The Line: Maryland by 4.5 points.
If we beat them without Stitt and with a sick Booker, why are the Terps favored? Good question. We'll try to get to the bottom of things.


Egregious Vasquez: A vision in dog-pee yellow
Any discussion of Maryland, which has whipped itself into a pretty dang good run since that ugly loss to Clemson, begins with Greivis Vasquez (19 ppg, 5 reb, 6 ast) The senior has become a media darling of late, and with good reason. He's scored in double figures in every game since Thanksgiving (including 10 at Clemson), he's done much better with the ball since his 9 turnovers against the Tigers and since the Terps are winning, he's seen as a fiery competitor, rather than a whiny distraction.

But he's the same Vasquez we all grown to know and hate. He's still solid at the line, can't hit a 3 if someone is in his face and is prone to foul against top flight guards.

A bigger reason for the Terps' recent improvement is the emergence of freshman big man and possible one-and-doner Jordan Williams (9 ppg, 9 reb, averaging a double-double in ACC play) He give the Terps an inside presence they lacked in losing to teams like Cincy and William and Mary earlier this year. And his 13 point-13 board game at Clemson was one reason our inside play looked so marginal. He still has a tendency to foul down low, but Williams is a strong indicator of the Terps fortunes in this game.



Other players to watch: Landon Milbourne (13 ppg, 6 reb) was totally shut down in the game at Littlejohn and looked Gawdawful against Duke and GTech, but keeps tossing up shots. He can hit ... we just need to hope he waits another game before recovering his shooting touch.

Eric Hayes (10 ppg, 4 ast, 45 percent from the arc) is a dangerous outside shooter who can handle the ball. It's feast or famine with his shooting, and we got him on an off night in Littlejohn. Sean Mosley (10 ppg,5 reb) has been sort of quiet for the past month and has only take 5 threes. Dino Gregory is seeing more minutes at forward, and the hero against GTech, Cliff Tucker has been finding the range from long distance.

As a team, the Turtles like an up-tempo game, much like Clemson does. Contrary to the Littlejohn game, they take care of the ball well, shoot well at the line and have the size to hold their own on the boards. They also have momentum. Since last we played, the Turtles have lost only once, to Duke.

There are a few weaknesses the Tigers can exploit, however:

1. Hound Vasquez: Tanner Smith's defense against the Terp guard was THE key in our win earlier. No doubt the Terps will be expecting the same thing Wednesday night, and will have planned some wrinkles. But just by making Maryland adjust, you've taken a key component from their offense.You don't have to force him into turnovers, just make him give up the ball. In losses to Clemson, Duke and Wake, taking the ball out of his hands was a key.

2. Hit the boards: Strange that a team with Maryland's size allows so many offensive boards. But the Terps are one of the worst teams in the ACC in allowing them. Clemson is built for hitting the offensive boards, and unless we're shooting lights-out from the wing, there will be plenty of opportunities.

3. Keep pushing: Since both teams like the up-tempo, keep pushing. There are two reasons this will benefit the Tigers: Clemson goes deeper on the bench (Maryland has 5 players getting 20 minutes or more to 7 for Clemson...and Maryland has 3 players getting 30-plus minutes to 0 for Clemson). As the game wears on, Clemson's press and depth will begin to tell.

Plus, this is the 5th game in 12 days for Maryland, and the 3rd for Clemson. It's a small difference, but late in the game, it may be a huge one.


Ask who I am after the game, Vaseline!

How will the Tigers respond? For openers, I hope we'll play a lot cleaner than in Littlejohn. According to records, it was the worst shooting in a win for Clemson in 13 years.

But this is a stronger, healthier, certainly more confident Clemson team than the one that scrapped to a win a month ago. Demontez Stitt (10 ppg, 4 ast) is on the floor, giving fellow guard Andre Young (9 ppg, better than 50 percent from the arc in the last 4 games) freedom to shoot. Ask Fla.State and Miami what that means.

Also Trevor Booker (15 ppg, 9 reb, a bucket of assists the past month) is healthy ... which should give the Terps cause for concern. he had 10 points and 16 boards against them while horking with the flu. Plus the dogged insistence of ACC opponents to double him has given wingman Jerai Grant (18 points, 12 board the last Maryland game) a month to become a human highlight reel. If Grant can avoid foul trouble (which is a concern on the road) he and Booker could absolutely own the inside.

Tanner Smith (only 1 double-figure game in the past month) will likely use his energy in disrupting Vasquez, while David Potter (45 percent form the arc in the last 5 games) will step up and provide addition outside shooting.


Johnson and Jennings have made strides

Perhaps the most intriguing wild card will be the play of freshmen Milt Jennings and Noel Johnson. Both had solid home stands, and Jennings especially has shown an improved touch around the rim. That was at home, though...will it translate to the road?

What's the verdict? I feel good about this game. While Maryland has been on a roll lately, of their last 8 wins, only 1 was against an ACC team with a league record above .500. They're good, but they ain't great.

Clemson has the talent and size to stay with the Terps. The Comcast Center doesn't seem to hold a particular dread, either. After watching Maryland's legs get weary in that last-gasp win over GTech, I truly believe Clemson can take the game to the Turtles.

Besides, the road doesn't get any easier from here. If there's a shot for us to steal a road game, this is it.


Message was edited by: RevDodd®


badge-donor-20yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-revdodd.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Comcast doesnt hold particular dread?


Feb 23, 2010, 10:29 AM

UM hasnt lost a home game since 12/30 - granted that was to William & Mary - but as you pointed out 6'10", 260 pound Williams is a much different player now.

Unfortunately I think that the Zebra's will dictate the winner. If the game is called like it was against UVA I think we have a good shot, but if it's called like the VT game we could be in for a long night.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

TO killed any demons at Comcast....


Feb 23, 2010, 10:35 AM

...whatever ill folks may hold against him, that dagger to cap a 9-point deficit and clinch the NCAA bid eternally erases any fear of the place Clemson might have. Our mindset is we're never out of a game there now.

Also FWIW, Clemson will be the second-highest RPI team to play in Comcast this year ... until next week's game with Duke.


Message was edited by: RevDodd®


badge-donor-20yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-revdodd.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


2007-08 we won 6 of our last 7 including


Feb 23, 2010, 10:48 AM

three road games to cap the regular season.

We received a bye and ended up in the ACC Tournament title game.

That's the way we need to finish THIS year!

The circumstances are very similar this time around.

badge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

agree... if we finish 10-6 in conference...


Feb 23, 2010, 10:58 AM

earn the bye and advance to the title game... I think we once again end up with the dreaded 5 seed ;)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"I've been working since I was 15 continually until now. I worked 40 hours a week at 15, when it wasn't even legal for 15 year olds to work that many hours."


Re: 2007-08 we won 6 of our last 7 including


Feb 23, 2010, 11:02 AM [ in reply to 2007-08 we won 6 of our last 7 including ]

last regular season game was a 1pt victory at home against VT. Remember - we went almost the entire 2nd half w/o a FG but Stitt hit two big FT's near the end.

I see your point though. Like that year we seem to be playing our best ball when it matters and I would love to see the season play out that way again - as long as we don't get someone like Villanova in the first round!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Villanova was better than a 12 and our nightmare...


Feb 23, 2010, 11:06 AM

...a team with a bevy of ballhandlers that could shred the press.

This time, maybe it will be our turn to be the lightly regarded also-ran team. Folks still refuse to believe we can get points from someone besides Trevor, and if we get ahead just put us on the line.

With a couple more wins, things are setting up nicely for us.

badge-donor-20yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-revdodd.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


that VT game was absolutely disgusting


Feb 23, 2010, 11:02 AM [ in reply to Comcast doesnt hold particular dread? ]

the refs controlled the tempo of the game, and inserted themselves at every opportunity. At a time when our defense was keeping the Hokies from hitting field goals, they single handedly kept us from getting in a tempo while allowing VT to score.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Karl Hess, Inc.


Feb 23, 2010, 11:21 AM

Hard to believe he ref'd the UVA game too, but more times than not you'll get the VT version.

Here's a neat link to some of our favorite Zebras.
http://statsheet.com/mcb/referees/face2name

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

and don't overlook Teddy Valentine


Feb 23, 2010, 11:24 AM

He really likes the sound of his whistle too.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

he was making it up to us i'm sure he saw the bad press***


Feb 23, 2010, 3:00 PM [ in reply to Karl Hess, Inc. ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

great analysis Rev - I agree , of the 3 remaining road games


Feb 23, 2010, 10:31 AM

, this is our best shot

Also , do you have to bring your own snake to your church or do ya'll share ?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Excellent!


Feb 23, 2010, 12:08 PM

...and Vasquez is a real diva. I hope he has a career worst game Wednesday.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Excellent!


Feb 23, 2010, 3:17 PM

Another point. Remember the things that Vasquez said about Stitt before the last game these teams had -- saying things like "not a big deal that Stitt won't play" and "not that big of a loss for Clemson" I would think Stitt would be very fired up to prove himself after not playing in the last game.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

we win vs Maryland***


Feb 23, 2010, 4:06 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 14
| visibility 1,656
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic