Replies: 23
| visibility 1
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
I just watched a ton of LSU film. My objective analysis
Jan 2, 2020, 3:24 PM
|
|
is that we're better than they are and will dominate. I have run through many different scenarios, models and simulations and each one comes back to Clemson winning by 21+ points, with one of my patented algorithm simulators returning a 58-point victory (for the record, I thought that simulator was broken when I ran it for the Fiesta Bowl and it said we would only win that game by a score of 29-23).
For some background, I developed these simulators before last season, and they have predicted a Clemson win every single game since then. So that's *checks notes* 29 times in a row they have been right.
This one will be Clemson by a million.
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83625]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 63724
Joined: 12/31/06
|
That’s what I’m talking about!
Jan 2, 2020, 3:27 PM
|
|
Go post that info on their board, only make it about 5 times as long
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Do they even have internet down there in
Jan 2, 2020, 3:34 PM
|
|
soon-to-be lugubrious Lafayette Loserana?
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [44073]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 32983
Joined: 2/22/03
|
LSU isn’t in Lafayette.
Jan 2, 2020, 4:07 PM
|
|
Everyone knows it’s in Shreveport.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10828]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13441
Joined: 10/13/14
|
Re: LSU isn’t in Lafayette.
Jan 2, 2020, 4:19 PM
|
|
Monroe.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3640]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5126
Joined: 4/23/19
|
Re: LSU isn’t in Lafayette.
Jan 2, 2020, 4:30 PM
|
|
It's MON-roe.
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
lugubrious Shreveport Loserana doesn't have the
Jan 2, 2020, 4:25 PM
[ in reply to LSU isn’t in Lafayette. ] |
|
same ring of alliteration to it though.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5099]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5139
Joined: 11/9/09
|
+1 - thank you for your hard work
Jan 2, 2020, 3:27 PM
|
|
I've already taken the batteries out of my defibrillator. Looking forward to the 30th verification.
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
You're welcome. I almost fell for all the stats their fans
Jan 2, 2020, 3:36 PM
|
|
were posting here so I thought it was important to run the real data and see what the analytics would predict. Needless to say their stats are pretty meaningless.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8565]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5495
Joined: 12/12/15
|
I knew we could count on you to crunch the numbers!
Jan 2, 2020, 3:43 PM
|
|
Great job! ??
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
It's all about the analytics and the story behind the
Jan 2, 2020, 3:55 PM
|
|
numbers. I'm not sure there's even a reason to play the game anymore to be honest.
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [15]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 28
Joined: 2/7/12
|
Re: I just watched a ton of LSU film. My objective analysis
Jan 2, 2020, 3:49 PM
|
|
I believe that we will beat LSU by 14+ points, perhaps even more lopsided than that. Their run defense is weak on the edges and their DB's are susceptible in the middle of the field. Go Tigers - Clemson Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
No, not 14+ points. It's 21+ points. Because math.***
Jan 2, 2020, 4:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4104]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2478
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: No, not 14+ points. It's 21+ points. Because math.***
Jan 2, 2020, 6:04 PM
|
|
It's 14+ AND 21+ because math.
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
At first I didn't think that was true, but I ran it through
Jan 2, 2020, 11:02 PM
|
|
my Microsoft Excel calculator and it turns out you are correct.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1079]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 387
Joined: 9/27/12
|
Re: I just watched a ton of LSU film. My objective analysis
Jan 2, 2020, 3:50 PM
|
|
I am on a couple of trash talking FB group pages and I would like your permission to copy and post this. It is hilarious.
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
You are welcome to share it, but it isn't meant to be funny
Jan 2, 2020, 3:56 PM
|
|
This is serious research that has been done here. It's complex math.
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [632]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 930
Joined: 9/16/14
|
Yeah, but what if you input the figures with the starters
Jan 2, 2020, 4:09 PM
|
|
staying in all 4 quarters? I think you should re-work your numbers based on the fact Dabo doesn't need to coach up the 3rd string guys anymore seeing this is the last game of the season.
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
These simulators take everything into consideration
Jan 2, 2020, 4:13 PM
|
|
including Will Swinney touchdown receptions. Yes, you read that right, receptions...with an "s"
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 26233
Joined: 9/19/11
|
TigerNet needs more posts like this with all these
Jan 2, 2020, 4:17 PM
|
|
facts and figures and not just made up crap.
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
It's important to get rid of the "eye test" and dive into
Jan 2, 2020, 5:00 PM
|
|
the analytics. Obviously, based solely off the "eye test" we would win by 35+, but the analytics suggest it will be closer than that.
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [82114]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 17318
Joined: 1/14/17
|
Re: I just watched a ton of LSU film. My objective analysis
Jan 2, 2020, 5:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Just passing along what the analytics say***
Jan 2, 2020, 6:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1714]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2492
Joined: 10/14/11
|
|
|
|
Replies: 23
| visibility 1
|
|
|