|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1606
|
CU Guru [1539]
TigerPulse: 56%
30
|
What I said in 1992
Nov 16, 2020, 4:23 AM
|
|
When USC joined the SEC in 92 I said they will always be a OLe Miss/Miss.State type program in that league year in and year out. They won't be a Vanderbilt but they will never be an Alabama-Florida-LSU type either. Most years they will be average to mediocre. They will occasionally have a year that is challenging the top but they will NEVER win that conference ! This is no matter who their coach is ! So they can brag about being in the SEC but if you never win it what's the point ? They BELONG in the ACC.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [10252]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Why do they BELONG in the ACC?!!
Nov 16, 2020, 5:07 AM
|
|
Why not the Sun Belt conference? Are you saying the ACC is on par to teams like Ole Miss/Miss St? Not sure why you think the ACC would even take them.
Go Tigers AND Stay Well Tiger Nation!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1539]
TigerPulse: 56%
30
|
Re: Why do they BELONG in the ACC?!!
Nov 16, 2020, 5:32 AM
|
|
That is where they have natural rivalries. Also year in and year out I'm not saying they would win the ACC by any means but I am saying that most years they could at least compete in football. You can call me a coot if you like ( I am NOT !! ) but to say that the ACC in football compares with the SEC is just ignoring reality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10252]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Didn't say that the ACC compares to SEC
Nov 16, 2020, 5:43 AM
|
|
#1 - I think their "rivalries" are The Citadel & App St.
#2 - Who cares if they "compete in football"? I'd have NO problem if they did away with football completely.
Go Tigers AND Stay Well Tiger Nation!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [35111]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 24218
Joined: 2003
|
Wrong. The Metro conference should've become a football
Nov 16, 2020, 5:18 AM
|
|
conference in 1991 when they expanded. SC belonged in it with their basketball school for 8 years.
Cincinnati
Louisville
Memphis
Tulane
FSU
Virginia Tech
Southern Miss
UofSC
Charlotte
USF
FSU and VT would've kept it from becoming a mid major.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6129]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
They don't belong in the ACC
Nov 16, 2020, 7:04 AM
|
|
They may never win the SEC, but that doesn't mean they're ACC material or that they'd be a good fit, because they're not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Eternal Icon [178214]
TigerPulse: 100%
70
Posts: 29443
Joined: 2012
|
let'em stay where they are at; the bottom of the sec. Right
Nov 16, 2020, 7:36 AM
|
|
where they belong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Icon [153761]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35743
Joined: 2010
|
I do not remember you saying that.***
Nov 16, 2020, 7:37 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11592]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 12891
Joined: 1999
|
So - you were half right.***
Nov 16, 2020, 1:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [101689]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 29916
Joined: 2005
|
Link to where you said that in 1992?***
Nov 16, 2020, 1:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [53252]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 32956
Joined: 1999
|
They were in the ACC. They made a stupid decision to leave.***
Nov 16, 2020, 1:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5125]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: What I said in 1992
Nov 16, 2020, 2:50 PM
|
|
What I remember is listening to you cooters claiming that you were suddenly “elite” just because SEC.
They wouldn’t win in the ACC either, silly coot. Hell, they wouldn’t win the Southern. Or SunBelt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1606
|
|
|
50
