»
Topic: TNET: Stand up and fight or tap out? Clemson defense chose to fight
Replies: 9   Last Post: Nov 2, 2020, 6:19 AM by: Summittiger
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 9  

TNET: Stand up and fight or tap out? Clemson defense chose to fight

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2020, 11:01 AM
 

 
Stand up and fight or tap out? Clemson defense chose to fight

Facing an 18-point deficit and on the verge of being beaten in the regular season for the first time since 2017, the Clemson Tigers – and especially the defense – had a decision to make – stand up and fight or tap out. Full Story »


link

Re: TNET: Stand up and fight or tap out? Clemson defense chose to fight


Posted: Nov 1, 2020, 11:35 AM
 

:)

link

Nah, this should have been a triple at least....***


Posted: Nov 1, 2020, 12:09 PM
 



2021 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg link

Re: TNET: Stand up and fight or tap out? Clemson defense chose to fight


Posted: Nov 1, 2020, 2:12 PM
 

Missed viewing the game yeterday due to power outage. Anyone have info on rebroadcasts?

link

Re: TNET: Stand up and fight or tap out? Clemson defense chose to fight


Posted: Nov 1, 2020, 5:41 PM
 

If you missed that game, you missed a Humm Dinger for sure!!!

2021 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg link


Re: TNET: Stand up and fight or tap out? Clemson defense chose to fight


Posted: Nov 1, 2020, 2:47 PM
 

I loved the response of the defense in the 2H. Pretty much viewed that a shut out would be essential for the half for a win. And we needed every bit of it. This was Venables at his best. Adjustments, motivation, and change in attitude. He unlocked all of the keys.

I do think one area of weakness was exposed on Saturday. We were not effective at man to man secondary coverage. And I believe BC was the first team we played who was really capable to go at this. Not looking to diminish what was accomplished. But even after the break, they had men open. Their lack of success was largely do our front pressure, dropping more guys back, and BC just plain did not execute with the proficiency they did in 1H.

link

Re: TNET: Stand up and fight or tap out? Clemson defense chose to fight

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2020, 3:07 PM
 

Breesee's sack was THE PLAY for me from the game!!! What a man child! He is going to be incredible! We will need him and T Davis come Saturday! Go Tigers!!!

link

Re: TNET: Stand up and fight or tap out? Clemson defense chose to fight


Posted: Nov 1, 2020, 3:16 PM
 

What chance do we have that Davis is able to play on Saturday?
GO TIGERS!!!

link

Re: TNET: Stand up and fight or tap out? Clemson defense chose to fight


Posted: Nov 1, 2020, 5:49 PM
 

Yes sir, I said after the game, that, that was the play of the game with us only being ahead by 4 point before that play. They were in a 4 down situation all the way down the field with enough time on the clock for them to score, and that play by Bresee ended their chances to win that game being only 4 points down, and Bresee causing the safety made it 6 points ahead for the good guys!!!

2021 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg link


Re: TNET: Stand up and fight or tap out? Clemson defense chose to fight


Posted: Nov 2, 2020, 6:19 AM
 

BC was holding Bresee on EVERY passing play. It was all they could do to slow him down.

link

Replies: 9  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: 6 season tickets and a parking pass for sale. My wife has a compromised immune system, so she is not...

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
1507 people have read this post