|
Replies: 9
| visibility 1577
|
Offensive Star [319]
TigerPulse: 58%
15
|
Ok Heisman haters
Dec 11, 2018, 12:54 PM
|
|
If Tlaw wins next year will it be a big deal then??!?
Message was edited by: HartReeder28
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [3667]
TigerPulse: 96%
35
|
Re: Ok Heisman haters
Dec 12, 2018, 5:38 PM
|
|
I want Trevor to win 3 Mannings.
In his behalf, I would trade any Heisman he wins for a single Manning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9109]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
I’d say it’s a big deal regardless, I don’t hate the Heisman
Dec 12, 2018, 6:33 PM
|
|
but I think the process has become a joke. Too much laziness and relying on media hype.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [88917]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 81728
Joined: 1999
|
Always been that way. Even more so in the old days
Dec 13, 2018, 12:00 PM
|
|
when the media actually got to see far fewer games. Heck, Paul Horung won in 1956 on a Notre Dame team that finished 2-8.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [15476]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 10822
Joined: 1999
|
It'll will be a big deal
Dec 12, 2018, 9:09 PM
|
|
b/c it will be Clemson's first. Still, it's going to be hard for people to forget either:
1) That CJ didn't even get an invite.
and/or
2) Deshaun didn't win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 26231
Joined: 2011
|
I don't hate the Heisman
Dec 21, 2020, 9:30 AM
|
|
I just despise many of the voters
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8972]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 11836
Joined: 2011
|
Get a pulse. Then we can talk.***
Dec 12, 2018, 10:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3667]
TigerPulse: 96%
35
|
Re: Ok Heisman haters
Dec 13, 2018, 11:50 AM
|
|
I don't know why the fans should take the Heisman more seriously than the voters do.
The debacles of the last few years have reminded voters that they need to be conscientious and responsible with their vote. But it will fade, and soon they will go back to making irresponsible, early-season choices just to get the "paperwork" off their desks.
Most had voted for Action Jackson before his team finished the season with an 0-4 streak. Their vote might not have changed because of that, but the fact that they did not, could not, even reconsider made the vote a travesty.
If the Heisman has any meaning at all, it cannot be won based on September and October performances alone.
That's why i keep pumping the Manning. It is limited to QBs, sure, but it is the only national award that also considers post-season play. Since Clemson is all about postseason play, i would like to see our QB win it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [88917]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 81728
Joined: 1999
|
It will never be a big deal to me. It’s
Dec 13, 2018, 11:57 AM
|
|
always been a flawed award and just a popularity contest. I would respect it more if all the voting was in mid January.
That being said, Henry and Jackson were ARGUABLY the right choices for a regular season only award.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [206]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
Sure it matters
Dec 13, 2018, 1:04 PM
|
|
It would be a nice reward to T Law, but doesn't matter nearly as much as getting to the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 9
| visibility 1577
|
|
|
50
