|
Replies: 14
| visibility 1
|
CU Medallion [73569]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 78044
Joined: 11/30/98
|
MSNBC is amusing and predictible
Nov 24, 2014, 10:34 PM
|
|
No mention at all of the facts of lying witnesses, just saying it was basically rigged
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [30593]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 28685
Joined: 8/17/05
|
stupid
Nov 24, 2014, 10:40 PM
|
|
"witnesses changed or redacted their stories after the autopsy results"
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [53783]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43564
Joined: 11/17/03
|
NBC did the same thing. Did not show one minute of the DA
Nov 24, 2014, 10:44 PM
|
|
spelling out the effort that was taken, explaining that 3 of the 12 jurors were African American, that many witnesses recanted, or changed thier original testimony(Which was recorded) after the autopsy came in and refuted thier testimony, that three African American witnesses stated that Michael Brown charged the Police Officer, etc.etc. No, Brian Williams led off with," Ferguson Grand Jury FAILS to indite....". Are you kidding me? He did not mention that the evidence showed that Michael Brown's blood was inside the police car, his DNA was on the officer's shirt collar,his dna was on the inside of the police car door,that at least one shot came from inside the police car and through the driver side door, that powder burns were on Michael Brown's thumb,etc.etc.
NBC is at least partially responsible for any violence that occurs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30593]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 28685
Joined: 8/17/05
|
agreed***
Nov 24, 2014, 10:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [284]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 367
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: MSNBC is amusing and predictible
Nov 24, 2014, 10:49 PM
|
|
Without even looking at the evidence they said the Procecutor is biased toward the police. Unreal reporting by this crew.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30593]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 28685
Joined: 8/17/05
|
not to mention it was the grand jury that decided
Nov 24, 2014, 10:50 PM
|
|
not the DA
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
I know this country would be a much, much better place
Nov 25, 2014, 7:14 AM
|
|
if people quit watching those cable "news" channels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [111617]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 73767
Joined: 9/10/03
|
Re: I know this country would be a much, much better place
Nov 25, 2014, 11:28 AM
|
|
how would we decide which team we are in when the civil war starts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3520]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 4253
Joined: 12/5/06
|
Re: MSNBC is amusing and predictible
Nov 25, 2014, 7:47 AM
|
|
I don't think it was rigged...but there will be enough questions raised that this will not go away for some time...unfortunately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [53783]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43564
Joined: 11/17/03
|
DO you mean like when the African American attorney debating
Nov 25, 2014, 11:27 AM
|
|
Megan said," Well, they should have taken it to a real jury". Do you mean that kind of bull crap?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34108]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33612
Joined: 9/13/99
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30490]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 62658
Joined: 10/4/99
|
That's the website. The TV site is a slightly different
Nov 25, 2014, 11:50 AM
|
|
animal, I reckon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34108]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33612
Joined: 9/13/99
|
Re: That's the website. The TV site is a slightly different
Nov 25, 2014, 12:06 PM
|
|
And since no one can prove otherwise without presenting a video recording, the fact becomes unknowable. Which is nice, because it lets everyone believe whatever they wanted to believe in the first place.
Still, it's hard for anyone to believe that Xtiger watched MSNBC nonstop since yesterday, which he would need to do in order to conclude that they never discussed the evidence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15749]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 17372
Joined: 2/1/99
|
To be fair, Counselor, TNet P&R Board /= Court of Law
Nov 25, 2014, 12:34 PM
|
|
It's not inappropriate to watch fifteen minutes of the initial coverage and comment on Tigernet about your impression of their bias.
If someone actually watched for a few hours (and God love you if you did) of coverage and can correct him, then they are welcome to do so. Of course, then the discussion becomes whether or not any comments in the third hour of coverage matters when everyone only watches the first 15 minutes. I realized the same thing when I noticed that a lot of Fox News articles cover all the facts...just that sometimes the facts are in the last couple paragraphs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34108]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33612
Joined: 9/13/99
|
Re: To be fair, Counselor, TNet P&R Board /= Court of Law
Nov 25, 2014, 1:03 PM
|
|
Your are absolutely correct about the appropriateness of half-baked arguments and unfounded accusations on Tnet. Although honestly, if one's goal is to show that MSNBC (or Fox News, for that matter) is biased, you really don't even need a half-baked argument. Because everyone already knows.
In this particular case, I linked an article from MSNBC's home page, which seems like good evidence that MSNBC is doing more than xtiger said. But then the idea came up that the TV channel is more biased than the website, which is an interesting (read:full of absolute #########) point that I've never heard anyone make before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
