Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Jan 9, 2017 - Targeting was NOT called
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 8
| visibility 3

Jan 9, 2017 - Targeting was NOT called


Jan 10, 2020, 8:57 PM

3 years ago in Tampa. CU vs Bama in the Natty. 3:40 left in 3rd QRT. Tigers at their own 25; 3rd down & needing to reach the 40. DW4 decides to run & gets 14 - - then is hit low by R. Foster & high by Minkah Fitzpatrick at the 39. Foster's low hit wouldn't have stopped the 1st down - but Fitzpatrick's launching high hit to Watson's facemask turned DW4 into a spinning helicopter blade, & he crashed at the 39. It was TARGETING by Fitz; should have been called; was NOT & wasn't even reviewed.

But - we won anyway!! So there!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


There were at least 3 hits in that game


Jan 10, 2020, 9:04 PM

that should have been flagged for Targeting. How many calls were there? None. No targeting calls.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: There were at least 3 hits in that game


Jan 10, 2020, 9:15 PM

Had Trevor not stayed down they would not have called targeting vs OSU. There was a targeting call that should’ve been made earlier ON THAT SAME DRIVE.

Remember, once he stayed down the refs went “uh oh”, maybe we’ll review to cover our a$$es. I think if the earlier targeting was called then the one they actually called never happens. Can’t hardly blame the kid probably thought the refs were allowing it.

Moral of the story, stay down after head to head contact.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Just rewatched the play to see if I was misremembering


Jan 10, 2020, 9:19 PM

That wasn't targeting. I think it looked worse than it really was because Deshaun tried to jump cut and was in the air when he got hit.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Just rewatched the play to see if I was misremembering


Jan 10, 2020, 9:32 PM

It definitely was targeting and should have been called.When you lead with helmet and hit helmet it’s targeting regardless if the other person is spinning or going down

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Just rewatched the play to see if I was misremembering


Jan 10, 2020, 9:33 PM [ in reply to Just rewatched the play to see if I was misremembering ]

It definitely was targeting and should have been called.When you lead with helmet and hit helmet it’s targeting regardless if the other person is spinning or going down

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Didn't look like he led with his helmet to me


Jan 10, 2020, 9:34 PM

Shrug

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Didn't look like he led with his helmet to me


Jan 10, 2020, 9:37 PM

sorry you dont understand the rule.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgringofhonor-74tiger.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I understand the rule just fine


Jan 10, 2020, 9:41 PM

The question is whether he led with his helmet or not which is open for interpretation. I happen to think he dove with his lead up and did not launch and lead with the crown. Where he hit Watson does not matter because Watson was the ball carrier and thus not defenseless.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 8
| visibility 3

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch 59 days!!!

by O.J.

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic