Replies: 14
| visibility 1868
|
Recruit [86]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 64
Joined: 6/5/24
|
Put yourself in the SEC's shoes
Jul 16, 2024, 1:35 PM
|
|
I know, I know, they ain't go no shoes.
But, for a moment, imagine you represent the best interests of that conference and the teams in it.
Why do you want Clemson or FSU?
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3317]
TigerPulse: 61%
Posts: 3806
Joined: 11/24/17
|
Re: Put yourself in the SEC's shoes
1
Jul 16, 2024, 1:53 PM
|
|
Probably all about the money. If FSU and Clemson bring in at least as much as they take it will be a no-brainer.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3329]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1244
Joined: 5/8/03
|
Re: Put yourself in the SEC's shoes
1
Jul 16, 2024, 1:54 PM
|
|
Pretty simple to me but what do I know.
Quality teams across the conference equals marquee match ups. Marquee match ups equal more tv's tuned to those games More tv's tuned to the games equal higher revenue Higher revenue equals more money per school.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15835]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8539
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Put yourself in the SEC's shoes
Jul 16, 2024, 1:56 PM
|
|
And don't forget upping the automatic playoff bids to 6 or 7. LMAO
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [142122]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 34085
Joined: 12/5/10
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4444]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3128
Joined: 11/30/98
|
UNREAL ppl dont get this.
2
Jul 16, 2024, 2:13 PM
|
|
Clemson and FSU, outside of ND, are the best available. PERIOD. They increase value to FM point. Its abt quality matchups. Creating more quality matchups. No one, whom will be available, does that better than CLEM and FSU. END OF STORY. Many more intriguing matchups with CLEM and FSU.
LMAO at ppl who think clem or fsu wont be in P2. LISTEN TO YOUR COACH
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [418]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 422
Joined: 9/5/22
|
Re: Put yourself in the SEC's shoes
1
Jul 16, 2024, 2:01 PM
|
|
They don’t make sense unless you’re willing to cull some of the bottom tier.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7410]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9507
Joined: 7/11/03
|
And I bet the SEC deep down would love to cull two bottom feeders and add
Jul 16, 2024, 3:13 PM
|
|
Clemson and FSU!
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [40]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 21
Joined: 2/4/24
|
Re: Put yourself in the SEC's shoes
2
Jul 16, 2024, 3:07 PM
|
|
ACC Claims losing Clemson FSU will cost $200 million in revenue. Sounds like that would be a take for the B1G or SEC.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27936]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16350
Joined: 10/13/08
|
Re: ^^^^^^This. A thousand times this.....
Jul 16, 2024, 4:38 PM
|
|
only a complete idiot would argue the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1788]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 969
Joined: 7/1/03
|
Re: Put yourself in the SEC's shoes
Jul 16, 2024, 9:27 PM
[ in reply to Re: Put yourself in the SEC's shoes ] |
|
And if the ACC claims this, doesn’t it seem reasonable that Clemson and FSU should collect this amount? Thusly, the ACC is diluting their value
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5483]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2375
Joined: 6/8/06
|
Re: Put yourself in the SEC's shoes
2
Jul 16, 2024, 3:18 PM
|
|
To keep the Big 10 out of the area.
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [57]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 41
Joined: 9/28/10
|
Re: Put yourself in the SEC's shoes
Jul 16, 2024, 6:53 PM
|
|
That’s exactly right. I think it’s less about what a conference stands to gain in isolation, and more about what it would mean to lose FSU and/or Clemson to the other conference (BIG or SEC).
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1505]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 1512
Joined: 9/2/05
|
Re: Put yourself in the SEC's shoes
1
Jul 16, 2024, 6:14 PM
|
|
lol why would they want a coot!!
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4168]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1924
Joined: 11/9/11
|
Re: Put yourself in the SEC's shoes
Jul 16, 2024, 8:17 PM
|
|
Clemson and FSU bring viewers. They put butts in seats. More than most SEC teams. Clemson also makes money. More than many SEC teams. Clemson hasn’t had to borrow money in years to build anything. Mostly private donations. Unlike the chickens who lose money annually. They use a shade of red for a reason. That’s the only maths they know. To owe.
Message was edited by: OneJedi® thanks to ducking autocorrect
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 1868
|
|
|