Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
How do they calculate Strength of Record ????
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 4
| visibility 1301

How do they calculate Strength of Record ????


Nov 6, 2017, 3:54 PM

I've searched a fair amount and can't find out exactly how they calculate it. All I can find is the philosophical definition of what it claims to assess - namely - "the chance of an average Top-25 team having the team’s record or better, given the opponents the team has played (and where they played) to date." This sounds nice in vague terms, but it's really tells you nothing about what the metric actually is, and about whether it's calculations in fact achieve that aim or not.

What is an "average top 25" team mean? Are we to assume some hypothetical team ranked 12.5 out of 25? And if so, what does THAT matter? I mean, a harder schedule for a bad team will also be harder for a good team, so that aspect seems irrelevant. Who cares how hard an elite teams schedule would be for a mediocre team? OF COURSE it will be easier for an elite team to accomplish "x' standards as compared to a mediocre team shooting for those same standards. I'm probably missing something in the wording there (or, they haven't communicated it in the wording), but in any event, it seems to be inserting some big hypotheticals/assumptions about (a) what an "average" top 25 team even IS, (b) how to assess what said, hypothetical, average team would do; and (C)what relevance it has to the process of simply comparing actual accomplishments of actual teams that DID play their schedule.

As such I've tried to find the nuts and bolts of the metric, but can't. Anybody know? It gets a lot of pub in the CFP discussions towards the end of the season, and it SOUNDS good since it purports so assess how good a teams accomplishments really are - but what's really in it?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We won't get the details


Nov 6, 2017, 4:20 PM

ESPN considers this calculation proprietary information.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, people like me.


Wow . . . I didn't know that. That's terrible**


Nov 6, 2017, 4:52 PM

d

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

naught goes into naught naught times***


Nov 6, 2017, 4:22 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Note: The CFP Committee does not use ESPN's Metrics


Nov 6, 2017, 4:30 PM

They have contracted with SportSource Analytics to get their statistical measures.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/11382331/stats-company-sportsource-analytics-inform-college-football-playoff-selection-committee-decisions

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/17650166/college-football-playoff-committee-strength-schedule-metrics

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, people like me.


Replies: 4
| visibility 1301
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic