|
Replies: 16
| visibility 3390
|
Orange Immortal [62385]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 45932
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1559]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
Re: Boys, this is what you call EXPLOSIVE!
5
5
Nov 18, 2025, 8:36 PM
|
|
I miss seeing speed all over the field
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1707]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Boys, this is what you call EXPLOSIVE!
1
5
5
Nov 18, 2025, 8:41 PM
|
|
You know Dabo went after the best with CJ when we never got the best.
Now it seems that Dabo goes after good people and not the best football players. Wonder why we have fallen on dark times?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [35937]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 24641
Joined: 2003
|
Dabo swears he couldve gotten Tebow to Clemson if not for Bowden
4
Nov 18, 2025, 9:02 PM
|
|
and his want for Willy Korn. I’m apt to believe him. Still would’ve liked to have seen Korn develop without those injuries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1559]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
Re: Dabo swears he couldve gotten Tebow to Clemson if not for Bowden
1
Nov 18, 2025, 9:34 PM
|
|
I was in high school the same time as Willy Korn. Remember watching him play on Fridays. I thought he was going to be the best Clemson qb ever
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8763]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 10664
Joined: 2010
|
Re: Dabo swears he couldve gotten Tebow to Clemson if not for Bowden
1
Nov 19, 2025, 9:23 AM
|
|
Same. Looking back he was just your average 4 star QB, but everyone acted like he was Tlaw or something lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [15944]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
|
Re: Boys, this is what you call EXPLOSIVE!
3
Nov 18, 2025, 8:49 PM
[ in reply to Re: Boys, this is what you call EXPLOSIVE! ] |
|
that is one thing Tom Allen said this year - he bemoaned the 'lack of speed on both sides of the ball'
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5988]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Definitely a Clemson GOAT
2
Nov 18, 2025, 8:46 PM
|
|
CJ Spiller has one of the best highlight reels of all time. No one caught CJ when he got behind you…cept Jacoby Ford 😂
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4163]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Boys, this is what you call EXPLOSIVE!
4
Nov 18, 2025, 8:57 PM
|
|
CJ pulled away from everyone. Spiller and Watkins are probably my favorite all time offensive playmakers we have ever had at Clemson, not counting quarterbacks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10711]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: Boys, this is what you call EXPLOSIVE!
3
Nov 18, 2025, 9:08 PM
|
|
Yep, and you can’t coach that. We need MORE of that type of player. Guess we don’t pay enough now…
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32985]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 11991
Joined: 2013
|
Re: Boys, this is what you call EXPLOSIVE!
5
5
Nov 18, 2025, 9:02 PM
|
|
My favorite thing about him was that he NEVER slowed down until he got to the back of the end zone no matter how far away the closest defender was. He broke the plane with the afterburners still going.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13544]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 15777
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Boys, this is what you call EXPLOSIVE!
1
Nov 18, 2025, 9:53 PM
|
|
His highlight reel is amazing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [74694]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 25617
Joined: 2005
|
Darting through defenders like he's playing chess...
Nov 18, 2025, 10:23 PM
|
|
You can almost see him setup a move 3 men past his current juke.
Then just take off. Man, I'm glad I got to witness that in person. What a player. Single handedly turned recruiting around here
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [9085]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Did A Lot Of That Very Stuff...... Battling Turf Toe***
Nov 18, 2025, 10:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2436]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Boys, this is what you call EXPLOSIVE!
Nov 18, 2025, 11:07 PM
|
|
His acceleration was unmatched. His ability to get up to full speed in an instant was unreal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [70896]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 91285
Joined: 2001
|
Can you imagine CJ and Etienne in the same backfield?
Nov 19, 2025, 8:16 AM
|
|
Talk about explosive!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13776]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 10965
Joined: 2006
|
Re: Boys, this is what you call EXPLOSIVE!
Nov 19, 2025, 8:29 AM
|
|
It is obvious that CJ couldn't break tackles ............ because no one ever touched him!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 3390
|
|
|
50
