Replies: 11
| visibility 1421
|
Paw Master [17720]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11389
Joined: 2007
|
ACC Basketball History
1
Feb 21, 2025, 7:56 AM
|
|
Some of our self-declared biggest basketball fans love to insist that we are historically “the worst” program in the ACC. A strange point for a Clemson fans to assert - repeatedly. There have been 20 teams in the ACC total. Of those teams, Clemson ranks 8th in tournament appearances. Despite competing in the toughest conference in basketball for much of the single bid NCAA tournament era, we are ahead of 12 other teams from the ACC historically. This was always an absurd assertion meant only to mock Clemson. That so many accept it as fact is shameful. But it is wildly untrue.
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12ce4/12ce4d1e771dc6313525629c37beffb012cef5fe" alt="" |
TigerNet Elite [69060]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90540
Joined: 2001
|
You do realize that for 25 years (from 1953 until 1978)...
4
Feb 21, 2025, 8:18 AM
|
|
the league only had between 7 and 8 members?
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12ce4/12ce4d1e771dc6313525629c37beffb012cef5fe" alt="" |
Paw Master [17720]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11389
Joined: 2007
|
Re: You do realize that for 25 years (from 1953 until 1978)...
1
Feb 21, 2025, 8:24 AM
|
|
I’m very well aware of it. Why does it any sense to reference our standing during that period, when we were arguably the “worst” of those 8 teams, when discussing our standing within an 9, 12, 15, or 18 team league?
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12ce4/12ce4d1e771dc6313525629c37beffb012cef5fe" alt="" |
Tiger Titan [49099]
TigerPulse: 77%
58
Posts: 36186
Joined: 2003
|
Since the current setup seems to be all that matters
3
4
Feb 21, 2025, 8:27 AM
|
|
does this mean that you’ll stop referencing Brownell’s first six years as our head coach in an effort to undermine him?
After all, that was roughly a decade ago and the ACC has expanded since then.
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12ce4/12ce4d1e771dc6313525629c37beffb012cef5fe" alt="" |
Paw Master [17720]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11389
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Since the current setup seems to be all that matters
2
Feb 21, 2025, 8:33 AM
|
|
It was only brought up as specific comparison to Mike Young which made it relevant. And it was only brought up as a response to your ridiculous comment. Any Patrick Ewing jokes to share this morning?
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12ce4/12ce4d1e771dc6313525629c37beffb012cef5fe" alt="" |
Orange Blooded [2371]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Since the current setup seems to be all that matters
2
Feb 21, 2025, 8:42 AM
|
|
Way to stay on topic. 🙄
Cue bat crap insane rant by individual who once described Clemson’s Basketball history as “pathetic.”
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12ce4/12ce4d1e771dc6313525629c37beffb012cef5fe" alt="" |
Paw Master [17720]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11389
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Since the current setup seems to be all that matters
Feb 21, 2025, 8:54 AM
|
|
It was a direct reply to his comment. And making a broad assertion about our history is completely different than using an irrelevant portion of our history and comparing with current accomplishments. But I’m pretty sure you know both of these things.
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12ce4/12ce4d1e771dc6313525629c37beffb012cef5fe" alt="" |
Orange Blooded [2371]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Since the current setup seems to be all that matters
2
Feb 21, 2025, 9:03 AM
|
|
You handled that well. Thank you. Hace you ever referrred to Clemson basketball history as “pathetic?” It’s a relevant question given the original post’s content.
If the early years don’t count anymore, Im happy to see a change in our measurement standards. That would mean we only look at about certain % of our history, right? Should we use SRS?
Again, appreciate the response.
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12ce4/12ce4d1e771dc6313525629c37beffb012cef5fe" alt="" |
TigerNet Elite [69060]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90540
Joined: 2001
|
Nothing about history is irrelevant...
3
Feb 21, 2025, 10:32 AM
[ in reply to Re: Since the current setup seems to be all that matters ] |
|
except to those who want to ignore or erase it.
Our habits, our education, our attitudes, and other aspects of our identity, are based and built on history and memories.
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12ce4/12ce4d1e771dc6313525629c37beffb012cef5fe" alt="" |
Paw Master [16247]
TigerPulse: 93%
51
Posts: 16188
Joined: 2004
|
Re: ACC Basketball History
1
Feb 21, 2025, 9:31 AM
|
|
great point. Going back to the last 3 years of the Oliver Purnell era and the expected Tourney appearance this season that will be 8 times in 18 years. That is more than half the time. More apperences in that span than historical better programs in Tobacco Road NC State and Wake Forest.
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12ce4/12ce4d1e771dc6313525629c37beffb012cef5fe" alt="" |
Orange Blooded [2371]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: ACC Basketball History
Feb 21, 2025, 1:43 PM
|
|
Clemson has the 5th best SRS in the ACC over that period. Not bad at all. I like these new standards of measurement. Great call out!
Louisville was 4th, which surprised me.
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12ce4/12ce4d1e771dc6313525629c37beffb012cef5fe" alt="" |
Paw Master [17571]
TigerPulse: 92%
51
Posts: 27650
Joined: 2003
|
We were a 7 team league when they went away from a single bid per conference***
1
Feb 21, 2025, 5:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1421
|
|
|