|
Replies: 22
| visibility 1781
|
Legend [6708]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 11192
Joined: 2007
|
Play on the ball, no excessive contact
2
Jan 7, 2025, 7:50 PM
|
|
But upgrade it? Softer than baby ####
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Beast [6366]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: Play on the ball, no excessive contact
Jan 7, 2025, 7:51 PM
|
|
Disagree. F1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6708]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 11192
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Play on the ball, no excessive contact
1
Jan 7, 2025, 7:52 PM
|
|
How so? You can’t make a play on the ball anymore? Lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6366]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: Play on the ball, no excessive contact
Jan 7, 2025, 7:53 PM
|
|
I didn’t write the rule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6708]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 11192
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Play on the ball, no excessive contact
Jan 7, 2025, 7:54 PM
|
|
I didn’t say you did, I asked how it was an F1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6366]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: Play on the ball, no excessive contact
Jan 7, 2025, 7:58 PM
|
|
Read my post below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6708]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 11192
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Play on the ball, no excessive contact
Jan 7, 2025, 8:02 PM
|
|
I did.
Doesn’t matter if he came from the back, as he’s making a play on the ball. There’s no rule that says you have to give a clean dunk.
In the air? Again, how do you make a play on the ball at the rim? Both of these parts of the rules are to protect players from cheap shots with no intention of going for the ball.
Blow to the head, this is the only part that could be argued, but again, play on the ball no intent.
Common foul, yes, F1 not a chance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18469]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 30613
Joined: 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2314]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [440]
TigerPulse: 99%
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6366]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: Play on the ball, no excessive contact
Jan 7, 2025, 7:59 PM
|
|
Funniest thing I’ve read today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [511]
TigerPulse: 95%
19
|
Re: Play on the ball, no excessive contact
2
Jan 7, 2025, 7:59 PM
[ in reply to Re: Play on the ball, no excessive contact ] |
|
Nope defender has the right to defend play . You about as snowflake as this officiating crew. Clean block. PERIOD!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6366]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: Play on the ball, no excessive contact
Jan 7, 2025, 8:02 PM
|
|
I stand corrected. THIS is the funniest thing I’ve read all day.
Listen, I’m about as devoted a Clemson fan as you’ll find, but it was clearly a foul and not surprising it was upgraded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18469]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 30613
Joined: 2006
|
Ridiculous call to upgrade that, announcers are 100% wrong***
2
Jan 7, 2025, 7:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5098]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Play on the ball, no excessive contact
Jan 7, 2025, 7:52 PM
|
|
Terrible, almost a clean block, should've been a basic foul
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6366]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: Play on the ball, no excessive contact
Jan 7, 2025, 7:57 PM
|
|
He came over the back hard, shooter in the air, blow to the head. I can’t disagree with the F1.
We cannot finish first half or end of game. Over and over and over. We led the entire half then gave up a big run in the final two minutes. This is a good team, but we’ve got to figure that stuff out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18469]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 30613
Joined: 2006
|
No hit to head, all contact was after the block and player in air is BS***
1
Jan 7, 2025, 8:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2336]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Re: Play on the ball, no excessive contact
Jan 7, 2025, 7:56 PM
|
|
I don’t like it, but he did swat the guy across the face?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6708]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 11192
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Play on the ball, no excessive contact
1
Jan 7, 2025, 7:58 PM
|
|
Wouldn’t say he swatted across his face, his upper arm made slight contact with it on the follow through after he swatted the ball, though.
I have no issue with a common foul, the upgrade is moronic, at best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [473]
TigerPulse: 100%
18
|
Re: Play on the ball, no excessive contact
1
Jan 7, 2025, 7:57 PM
|
|
Well I guess if you hit the floor and act like your dying….
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redshirt [91]
TigerPulse: 100%
10
|
Re: Play on the ball, no excessive contact
2
Jan 7, 2025, 7:59 PM
|
|
I agree. Since when can you not make a play on the ball when a player is in the air? Does that mean you can’t contest dunks? Doesn’t make any sense to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [57406]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 44612
Joined: 2003
|
Yet, in the South Carolina game , we had a player get a steal for a break
1
Jan 7, 2025, 8:06 PM
|
|
away layup and the coot player grabbed him from behind and held him up. CLEAR FLAGRANT 1 per the rules. Reviewed and called an ordinary foul. Officiating just continues to deteriorate.It absolutely takes the fun out of watching.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6366]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: Yet, in the South Carolina game , we had a player get a steal for a break
1
Jan 7, 2025, 8:57 PM
|
|
I agree with you there. ACC officiating is inconsistent, and they’ve been the worst in America ever since I can remember.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 22
| visibility 1781
|
|
|
50
