|
Replies: 15
| visibility 7
|
Rock Defender [64]
TigerPulse: 69%
7
|
Someone help me out
Jul 27, 2018, 7:24 PM
|
|
What I don't get is that the media is still cautious with us, but are all aboard jumping on the gamecock bandwagon after a lack luster 9-4 season. I really think they'll be closer to 6-6 this year, per-season guides "possibly a 10 win team"
what?
|
|
|
|
 |
Asst Coach [715]
TigerPulse: 100%
22
|
Re: Someone help me out
Jul 27, 2018, 7:27 PM
|
|
No, HTH
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [40650]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 18495
Joined: 2015
|
zero chance usc wins 10 games***
Jul 27, 2018, 7:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59956]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 61322
Joined: 2007
|
Re: zero chance usc wins 10 games***
Jul 27, 2018, 8:08 PM
|
|
Absolutely Zero chance!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32629]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 35510
Joined: 2003
|
Why not? Their only compettitian this year will be
Aug 13, 2018, 10:39 AM
[ in reply to zero chance usc wins 10 games*** ] |
|
Stanford and Washington. USC has more talent than both.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 26231
Joined: 2011
|
I wouldn't call it "lack luster," I'd call it amazing.
Jul 27, 2018, 7:38 PM
|
|
They shouldn't have won more than 6 or 7 games, but their amazing luck, and worst division in the big 5 gave 'em a record they should have never even sniffed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [225]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
Re: Someone help me out
Jul 27, 2018, 8:43 PM
|
|
Heck no,they were very lucky to win that many games last year. They really sucked. Hell, la tech was a better team than them. I see 7 and 5 at best. I hope worse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3686]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
a host on ESPNU radio on Sirius today stated Michigan
Jul 27, 2018, 8:54 PM
|
|
Basically rolled over for coots in second half of bowl game last year because the game just meant that little to them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1732]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Someone help me out
Jul 27, 2018, 8:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [43276]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 11039
Joined: 2017
|
Watch how the season plays out then come and talk to me.
Jul 27, 2018, 9:43 PM
|
|
If you are trying to insinuate that the pundits think SC will be better than Clemson you are dead wrong. The last two beatdowns are a very strong indication of the talent gap between the two programs and this year will be no different. Clemson is picked as the number 2 team by most everyone. That’s not cautious and if there’s a “gamecock bandwagon” I haven’t seen it from many people outside of Columbia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1350]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
It just means more.***
Jul 27, 2018, 10:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [84303]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 17710
Joined: 2017
|
bump
Aug 13, 2018, 8:57 AM
|
|
cause
cootish
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7719]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: Someone help me out
Aug 13, 2018, 9:00 AM
|
|
yea looking at this guys history he reeks of chicken ####.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1363]
TigerPulse: 96%
28
|
We're ranked #1 or #2 in preseason polls
Aug 13, 2018, 9:03 AM
|
|
The coots are either unranked are at the bottom of the top 25, so I'm not sure I agree with your post.
I wouldn't be surprised if they got 8-9 wins again because their schedule is so soft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [813]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: We're ranked #1 or #2 in preseason polls
Aug 13, 2018, 10:36 AM
|
|
If I remember correctly, all the SEC teams they beat last year combined for a grand total of two victories over P5 teams, not counting wins over each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19631]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 15013
Joined: 2010
|
Must be local media
Aug 13, 2018, 10:40 AM
|
|
Vegas and natl media by and large has us as highest probability to make playoffs ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 7
|
|
|
50
