|
Replies: 10
| visibility 801
|
All-In [41336]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6901
Joined: 12/14/20
|
Why is the NCAA
4
Nov 29, 2023, 4:56 PM
|
|
So incompetent when it comes to everything?
|
|
|
|
 |
Athletic Dir [888]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 911
Joined: 10/19/21
|
Re: Why is the NCAA
3
Nov 29, 2023, 5:01 PM
|
|
They definitely are but all the court cases forced these circumstances. If the NCAA and institutions had just paid the athletes what they are worth, they could have been part of a solution rather than the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1047]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 2093
Joined: 4/7/22
|
Re: Why is the NCAA
1
Nov 29, 2023, 7:44 PM
|
|
Paying the players isn't a solution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [68154]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 115583
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Why is the NCAA- Now here is a solution
Nov 29, 2023, 9:59 PM
|
|
good old sufuric acid. Has nothing to do with football but a great solution
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10891]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7655
Joined: 1/6/04
|
Re: Why is the NCAA
5
5
Nov 29, 2023, 5:04 PM
|
|
Fear of lawsuits and trying to exist as long as the schools with let them.
They are kinda like a HOA in rural Mississippi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [55604]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58528
Joined: 7/18/07
|
Re: Why is the NCAA
3
Nov 29, 2023, 5:30 PM
|
|
Absolutely, and I can't understand why these conferences are still allowing them to handle any of the conferences business when they don't do a thing to that could improve all conferences. The NCAA is the exact reason why college FB is eating each other up with the transfer portal and no rules pertaining the NIL...
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1047]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 2093
Joined: 4/7/22
|
Re: Why is the NCAA
Nov 29, 2023, 7:45 PM
|
|
The NCAA isn't the reason. It's the Supreme Court.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4065]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4551
Joined: 3/6/01
|
Because they are an ancient relic. Theyll be gone in a few years
2
Nov 29, 2023, 5:35 PM
|
|
The playoff, NIL and the portal have rendered them useless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58597]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46404
Joined: 4/23/00
|
It's not so much incompetent as it is irrelevant.
1
Nov 29, 2023, 7:42 PM
|
|
But they have been incompetent for a long time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [955]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 1555
Joined: 6/4/12
|
Re: It's not so much incompetent as it is irrelevant.
1
Nov 29, 2023, 8:00 PM
|
|
The ncaa is an unintentional monopoly that’s on too deep to turn back, so they relinquish more and more control over time until people figure out it’s a house of cards and dissolves.
Much like the federal reserve and our banking system, except that one was intentional.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3613]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 3001
Joined: 9/17/22
|
Re: Why is the NCAA
Nov 29, 2023, 11:37 PM
|
|
The sport of college football has been allowed to be corrupt for a long time.
The NCAA has made several controversial decisions regarding punishment of schools for various infractions. Here are a few examples:
1. Penn State University (2012): In the wake of the Jerry Sandusky child abuse scandal, the NCAA imposed severe sanctions on Penn State's football program. These included a $60 million fine, a four-year postseason ban, a reduction in scholarships, and vacating wins from 1998 to 2011. The decision was controversial because it bypassed the usual investigative and enforcement processes of the NCAA, and some argued that the punishment was too harsh for the football program's involvement in the scandal.
2. University of Miami (2013): The NCAA's investigation into the University of Miami's football program involved allegations of improper benefits and recruiting violations. However, the investigation process itself was marred by misconduct on the part of NCAA investigators, including unethical tactics and improper collaboration with a convicted felon. As a result, the NCAA faced criticism for its handling of the case and the integrity of its investigation.
3. University of North Carolina (2017): The NCAA's handling of the academic scandal at the University of North Carolina was controversial. The scandal involved widespread academic fraud, including "paper classes" that required little to no work for high grades. Despite the academic misconduct, the NCAA concluded that it did not have jurisdiction over the case and did not impose any significant penalties on the university's athletic programs. This decision was met with criticism, as many believed that the academic fraud should have warranted more severe punishment.
There needs to be a larger entity to control this sport as it is now. The NCAA itself cannot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 10
| visibility 801
|
|
|
50
