|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1264
|
Hall of Famer [8760]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Recruiting rankings
7
7
Oct 29, 2025, 8:12 PM
|
|
2023: 14th
2024: 15th
2025: 28th
2026: 16th (for now)
It was fun while it lasted. This team will only get less talented as each year passes.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Tiger [36587]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 15238
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Recruiting rankings
1
Oct 29, 2025, 8:17 PM
|
|
You are not counting the projects in this evaluation, obviously. 🤣
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [83829]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 31314
Joined: 2018
|
I liked you better as a poster when you were 300 lbs
1
Oct 29, 2025, 8:24 PM
|
|
Your posts are akin to wiping your chapped butt with a briar bush.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8760]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: I liked you better as a poster when you were 300 lbs
1
Oct 29, 2025, 10:18 PM
|
|
I’ll gain the weight back then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3749]
TigerPulse: 64%
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [83829]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 31314
Joined: 2018
|
The only response that could compliment,
1
Oct 29, 2025, 11:55 PM
|
|
I know you are but what am I?
Fries go in the bag, Boi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32476]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 24185
Joined: 2002
|
Well obviously this was going to be a small class
3
Oct 29, 2025, 8:58 PM
|
|
with all the walkons that we need to put on scholarship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [54059]
TigerPulse: 79%
59
Posts: 38717
Joined: 2003
|
When you have the amazing retention we do, you will always have small classes.
1
4
Oct 29, 2025, 9:12 PM
|
|
We do a great job keeping our underachieving stars as well as our five heart recruits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8760]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: When you have the amazing retention we do, you will always have small classes.
3
Oct 29, 2025, 10:18 PM
|
|
Some would say we do it better than everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [70784]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 20156
Joined: 2020
|
Re: Well obviously this was going to be a small class
3
Oct 29, 2025, 9:16 PM
[ in reply to Well obviously this was going to be a small class ] |
|
Actually I was thinking just the opposite. That this was going to be one of our bigger classes with all the attrition. I could be wrong. Either way, it should be an oversign class. Unless we're truly holding spots for transfers.
We can brag all we want, and Dabo loves to talk about our retention, but as I posted below, that retention isn't helping us win more. If anything, we're keeping guys we have zero keeping because they're not contributing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2140]
TigerPulse: 89%
32
|
Sarcasm from Clemchem****
1
Oct 29, 2025, 10:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [70784]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 20156
Joined: 2020
|
Re: Recruiting rankings
6
6
Oct 29, 2025, 9:08 PM
|
|
Thanks Leon. You always come with facts and evidence.
A couple things that are really concerning to me is the record against p4 competition since 2023 is 20-15. Which I believe I'm correct that only 2 wins were against top 20 teams. One being smu last year... which imo was overrated. Only 4 losses were against top 20 teams. So nearly all of our wins and losses were against mediocre competition.
What's even more concerning is the fact that more than 50% of the highest rated recruits in those classes are 2nd or 3rd string and snap counts are low. One example is Vic Burley. Saying, most of the players seeing action from those classes were the lower 2 or 3 star prospects. I'm not naive and understand that happens on every team, but it's alarming that our numbers are skewed so much. Baffling.
Anyway, thanks again for your facts and not just conjecture.
LeonTrotsky
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8760]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Recruiting rankings
1
Oct 29, 2025, 10:22 PM
|
|
You’re right.
Last years schedule gave us an illusion that we were back. In reality, we just beat a bunch of mediocre/bad teams (except SMU).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1264
|
|
|
50
