|
Replies: 18
| visibility 907
|
Standout [225]
TigerPulse: 90%
13
|
We all need to write the ACC on that terrible call
Nov 2, 2025, 5:24 PM
|
|
There should be no reprimand on something is clearly missed that bad and not reviewed and reversed. Yes we should’ve won the game before then but we would have won it without that stupid car gonna write them!
|
|
|
|
 |
Dynasty Maker [3141]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: We all need to write the ACC on that terrible call
2
Nov 2, 2025, 5:26 PM
|
|
Getting out the quill and ink now.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20958]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
You also going to thank them for not calling the PI one or two plays earlier?
Nov 2, 2025, 5:33 PM
|
|
I mean, hey, be consistent.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [42675]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 15770
Joined: 2014
|
Re: We all need to write the ACC on that terrible call
1
Nov 2, 2025, 5:52 PM
|
|
Do you have a fax number?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7688]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: We all need to write the ACC on that terrible call
Nov 2, 2025, 5:56 PM
|
|
Some on here have said the pi occurred when the receiver was trying to make his break and was impeded. I havent seen a video that goes back that far. Has anyone else here?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [137]
TigerPulse: 97%
11
|
Re: We all need to write the ACC on that terrible call
Nov 2, 2025, 6:01 PM
|
|
Someone should check the ref's bank account on Monday morning!!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Walk-On [79]
TigerPulse: 77%
8
|
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7688]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: We all need to write the ACC on that terrible call
Nov 2, 2025, 6:58 PM
|
|
Clearly pi. Send it to neff and dabo.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Walk-On [79]
TigerPulse: 77%
8
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2679]
TigerPulse: 86%
33
|
Re: We all need to write the ACC on that terrible call
Nov 2, 2025, 6:30 PM
[ in reply to Re: We all need to write the ACC on that terrible call ] |
|
Yes. I saw it today. The DB was way to handsy and grabbed the entire route. It wasn't until hevfell down that it like Offensive interference. I mean based on tbe situation and time of the game it looked like a horrible call. My argument for Duke would be that if the db hadn't of restricted the route then the wr has a play on tbe ball?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
1st Rounder [643]
TigerPulse: 95%
21
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Athletic Dir [1123]
TigerPulse: 93%
26
|
Re: We all need to write the ACC on that terrible call
Nov 2, 2025, 6:28 PM
|
|
Nope.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Recruit [61]
TigerPulse: 54%
7
|
Re: We all need to write the ACC on that terrible call
Nov 2, 2025, 6:34 PM
|
|
It was definitely a justified call after seeing that view. I’d say defensive holding. No cares. That isn’t why Duke won.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4828]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: We all need to write the ACC on that terrible call
1
Nov 2, 2025, 6:58 PM
|
|
Agree - likely the right call, especially when combined with the other angle and still shot that shows Terrell grabbed the facemask after the ball was in the air. He pulled the mask down and towards him and then waved his hands off to try to avoid the call. Check out in slow-mo between 22 and 24 seconds of the video. Hate it but could be called as many times as not. Certainly not the worst call in the history of the sport as Dabo makes it out to be.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
1st Rounder [643]
TigerPulse: 95%
21
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Associate AD [1017]
TigerPulse: 65%
25
|
Re: We all need to write the ACC on that terrible call
Nov 2, 2025, 7:39 PM
|
|
I would have called holding instead of P.I.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [2061]
TigerPulse: 97%
31
|
Re: We all need to write the ACC on that terrible call
Nov 2, 2025, 7:42 PM
|
|
He didn't hold him though. You're allowed to make contact with the receiver until the ball is in the air.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Conqueror [11907]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: We all need to write the ACC on that terrible call
Nov 2, 2025, 7:41 PM
|
|
That’s like contacting the BBB. Ain’t gonna do $hit.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [28406]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16779
Joined: 2018
|
Re: We all need to write the ACC on that terrible call
1
Nov 2, 2025, 7:45 PM
|
|
I wrote my congressman and asked him to call Jim Phillips personally.
I will get back to you when I hear something…
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 18
| visibility 907
|
|
|