|
Replies: 24
| visibility 3652
|
National Champion [7453]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
If we only get one more recruit this cycle, who do we want?
Jan 16, 2016, 8:21 AM
|
|
i want a CB, either Mullen or Hill, and I wouldn't be picky about which one. We need talent at CB. It would be tough to pick that over Gary, but I would.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
Tough..
Jan 16, 2016, 8:22 AM
|
|
It would be hard to say that I would take someone over Gary, but other than that I would go with Mullen due to our need.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2832]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: If we only get one more recruit this cycle, who do we want?
Jan 16, 2016, 8:23 AM
|
|
I know the need is a db but I really want to see Gary in Orange! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 100%
10
|
Re: If we only get one more recruit this cycle, who do we want?
Jan 16, 2016, 8:38 AM
|
|
Hardman for CB then Mullen then Gary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6461]
TigerPulse: 95%
40
Posts: 13148
Joined: 2015
|
Re: If we only get one more recruit this cycle, who do we want?
Jan 16, 2016, 8:58 AM
|
|
Mecole for sure. And we have Dex and Nyles why are you people saying another DT?? We need a CB way more!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [109]
TigerPulse: 75%
11
|
Re: If we only get one more recruit this cycle, who do we want?
Jan 16, 2016, 1:56 PM
|
|
Because pressure busts pipes.. DE =pass rush..Pass rush =good corners turn to great corners..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1211]
TigerPulse: 86%
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1211]
TigerPulse: 86%
27
|
(#1 overall, 5* DT > 4* S or 5* S) all day long****
Jan 16, 2016, 8:56 AM
|
|
tPP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [38595]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 33260
Joined: 2011
|
Re: If we only get one more recruit this cycle, who do we want?
Jan 16, 2016, 8:59 AM
|
|
Mullen .
Totally .
Or Gary .
Aww...I don't want to decide !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [833]
TigerPulse: 97%
23
|
Gotta be Gary by far
Jan 16, 2016, 9:50 AM
|
|
The trenches is where the game is won. Elite DLs make elite secondary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [787]
TigerPulse: 98%
22
|
I agree..and an elite DL makes a CBs life so much easier...
Jan 16, 2016, 9:59 AM
|
|
We're going to have to get used to life without Alexander, but what college team in the country
could lose a talent like that and just plug in another just like him.
Go Tigers!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [36452]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 18324
Joined: 2013
|
FSU always seems to just plug in another 5 star CB every time.***
Jan 16, 2016, 10:02 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [787]
TigerPulse: 98%
22
|
I'd take Alexander over Ramsey.
Jan 16, 2016, 10:15 AM
|
|
Go Tigers!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [109]
TigerPulse: 75%
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6938]
TigerPulse: 88%
41
Posts: 22593
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [41658]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43343
Joined: 1998
|
what in the world makes you think we only get one more?
Jan 16, 2016, 10:21 AM
|
|
You could have asked, if we only get 10 more, who do you want?
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [619]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
If we got Gary, then the need at DB would be even
Jan 16, 2016, 1:31 PM
|
|
greater because I'm pretty sure no one would ever be able to run on us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1211]
TigerPulse: 86%
27
|
No, the pass rush created by having 2 athletic DT's...
Jan 16, 2016, 2:45 PM
|
|
The constant pressure from 2 athletic DT's + the 2 potentially very good DE's would give any QB very little time to get rid of the ball; making it a lot easier on the corners and the secondary in general. That is how the Giants beat Pats in 2 Super Bowls; that and dumb luck in the 1st one. It was the disruptive nature created by the front 4 of the Giants that caused Brady so much trouble, not their secondary locking down the wideouts. With Gary we would have minimum of 4 stud DT's capable of creating a consistent pass rush threat, from the DT position, each warranting a double team, as opposed to having less athletic, run stuffer types. Having 4 with this capability allows you to keep them fresh throughout the game; and would be problem for any OL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1399]
TigerPulse: 97%
28
|
Re: If we only get one more recruit this cycle, who do we want?
Jan 16, 2016, 2:45 PM
|
|
Db
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10871]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 12938
Joined: 2012
|
I think Gary. Disruption up front takes
Jan 16, 2016, 2:46 PM
|
|
Pressure of the DBs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1197]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Re: If we only get one more recruit this cycle, who do we want?
Jan 16, 2016, 3:16 PM
|
|
Mullen!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6938]
TigerPulse: 88%
41
Posts: 22593
Joined: 2003
|
Re Yeah, but we can't lose John Simpson .***
Jan 16, 2016, 4:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3289]
TigerPulse: 88%
34
|
Re: If we only get one more recruit this cycle, who do we want?
Jan 17, 2016, 5:43 AM
|
|
5* or shutdown corner!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4170]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: If we only get one more recruit this cycle, who do we want?
Jan 17, 2016, 6:02 AM
|
|
I think you can't pass on a guy like Gary.
Adrian Baker is very talented, he just needs experience.
Tankersley reminds me of Breeland but faster.
Mark Fields is a guy I believe can be nasty at the nickel.
I like the starters going into next year, but I think next years Secondary is equivalent to this year's LB corp. There's a huge gap in talent between the starters and backups. On the positive side the entire front 7 is talented and deep.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4378]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: If we only get one more recruit this cycle, who do we want?
Jan 19, 2016, 12:42 AM
|
|
If I had to say we could have any one that we wanted, I'd say Gary. If your front is good enough, the DB'S have a lot easier job as the passing game gets disrupted, plus you shut down the running game. Way more upside with a stud D Line than a lock down corner. Unless you can guarantee another Dion Sanders who takes away 1/3 of the field plus kick returns, I'm going D Line all day long. After that I would say O line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 24
| visibility 3652
|
|
|
50
