Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Top 5 why we lost
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 7
| visibility 1

Top 5 why we lost


Nov 25, 2012, 2:49 PM

1. Clowney-if he is on our side we win. DL played better than FSU
2.Dylan Thomas-who'd thought he'd have the better night
3. Way too many 3 and long conversions.
4. Turnovers killed any mo we got
5. Dropped balls-playing tight

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Top 5 why we lost


Nov 25, 2012, 2:55 PM

1.They scored more points
2.We scored fewer points
3.They scored more td's.
4.We scored fewer td's.
5.See any of the above.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Top 5 why we lost


Nov 25, 2012, 2:55 PM

I'd amend #5 to playing tight and hearing footsteps! Their dbacks intimidated our receivers most of the night...check the video!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Top 5 why we lost


Nov 25, 2012, 3:30 PM

Your assessment may very well be partially correct. The reason we lost the football game was due to lack of physicality. We just are physical. Our offense is the problem. It is a finese type offense. We just aren't tough enough, especially up front, to run the football sufficiently to control the game. We look pretty well in the ACC but we are absolutely no match for the SEC. As a long time tiger with two grown children who are lettermen, it's hard as heck to swallow. Some people may want to point to the defense. The defense is not the "big" problem. I would love to see the practice ######. We need to go to Alabama, LSU, or Georgia. What is the common thread? Toughness. If we are not physical enough to control the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball, then we've got trouble outside the ACC. Why was Stanford successful against Oregon? Toughness, physicality, a "tinge" of meaness. Oregon is definitely no match for the big guns in the SEC. Every year we acquire a sense of pseudo security and/or confidence when we beat most everyone we play around the conference. When it comes to sakarlina, we have problems and those problems carry into our bowl performance. It doesn't matter to me if you agree or not, I've been around the sport long enough to come to that conclusion over time. It is just my opinion. I may be as wrong as can be. At least, think about it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Top 5 why we lost


Nov 25, 2012, 3:41 PM

And 3 dropped interceptions

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Coaching, coaching, coaching***


Nov 25, 2012, 3:44 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

bs,bs,bs.


Nov 25, 2012, 3:49 PM

defensive talent. they controlled the ball for most of the 2nd half. we couldn't make a 3rd down stop when we needed too. as an example- brewer dropped 2 sure int's.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Spurrier, Spurrier, Spurrier, Spurrier & Spurrier ***


Nov 25, 2012, 6:17 PM

nm

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 7
| visibility 1
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Morning suprise

by 2k®

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic