|
Replies: 17
| visibility 66
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46066
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Former DB target decommits from Virginia Tech
Jul 21, 2018, 11:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Immortal [167938]
TigerPulse: 100%
69
Posts: 28832
Joined: 2012
|
Re: TNET: Former DB target decommits from Virginia Tech
Jul 21, 2018, 11:18 PM
|
|
Hopefully Clemson bound!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32563]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 18387
Joined: 2008
|
Re: TNET: Former DB target decommits from Virginia Tech
Jul 23, 2018, 10:28 AM
|
|
Uh, no. Staff has backed off this one. We see him at safety, he wants to play CB. End of story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10847]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
pretty major decootment for the team with the thinnest
Jul 21, 2018, 11:20 PM
|
|
Secondary in the ACC.
Maybe the ohio state bag man is after him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [697]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Re: pretty major decootment for the team with the thinnest
Jul 22, 2018, 12:00 AM
|
|
It's about to get even worse. They're going to lose another corner commit to Michigan as a receiver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3563]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
He wrights big don't he?
Jul 22, 2018, 8:13 AM
|
|
Nice. But big.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1324]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
They say the larger your handwriting....
Jul 22, 2018, 4:20 PM
|
|
the lower your IQ. Who knows?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [391]
TigerPulse: 60%
16
|
Re: TNET: Former DB target decommits from Virginia Tech
Jul 22, 2018, 8:51 AM
|
|
Wasn't he talking trash about Clemson after his commitment?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1370]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: TNET: Former DB target decommits from Virginia Tech
Jul 22, 2018, 8:57 AM
|
|
Wasn't he talking trash about Clemson after his commitment?
Clemson backed off of him and moved on to recruiting guys who want to play safety and are team players.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1251]
TigerPulse: 90%
27
|
Re: TNET: Former DB target decommits from Virginia Tech
Jul 22, 2018, 9:25 AM
|
|
"Clemson backed off him" You were very kind in your phrasing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1545]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
Re: TNET: Former DB target decommits from Virginia Tech
Jul 22, 2018, 9:31 AM
|
|
What did he say about Clemson? I don’t know the story with this guy, thought that we might try and go get him but now reading these post doesn’t seem like clemson and him ended things on good terms. Would like to know more. Go Tigers!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24027]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 20290
Joined: 2011
|
Clemson wanted him at S
Jul 22, 2018, 9:39 AM
|
|
He wants to play CB
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [636]
TigerPulse: 72%
21
|
Re: Clemson wanted him at S
Jul 22, 2018, 8:50 PM
|
|
I guess we better go ahead & offer him as a CB and don't pull any type of bait and switch like getting him to sign and then all of a sudden try moving him to S as they are currently attempting with McMichael.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5492]
TigerPulse: 89%
38
Posts: 11946
Joined: 2001
|
Re: Clemson wanted him at S
Jul 22, 2018, 8:57 PM
|
|
You’re f os
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [636]
TigerPulse: 72%
21
|
Re: Clemson wanted him at S
Jul 22, 2018, 10:05 PM
|
|
Just truth. We almost lost McMichael because of this same situation about CU wanting him to play S and him wanting to play CB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19539]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
Truth has proof attached
Jul 23, 2018, 10:41 AM
|
|
You're just posting words..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12603]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
Re: TNET: Former DB target decommits from Virginia Tech
Jul 22, 2018, 6:45 PM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Former DB target decommits from Virginia Tech ] |
|
He didn't say anything bad that I saw. The only thing that he said and some people said he was throwing shade but when he committed to VT he said, "I am All-in with Virginia Tech!". I wouldn't call that talking bad, just probably disappointed he didn't get his way with Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [567]
TigerPulse: 94%
20
|
Re: TNET: Former DB target decommits from Virginia Tech
Jul 22, 2018, 1:24 PM
|
|
We need to offer and push for Hill st DB.
Booth, Jones, and Hill would be a terror.
Charleston, Thornton, Phillips, and Zanders would be a terror at the safety and NB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 66
|
|
|
50
