Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46074
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Advanced outlook: Clemson-LSU title game projections
Jan 8, 2020, 1:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Letterman [153]
TigerPulse: 100%
12
|
Re: TNET: Advanced outlook: Clemson-LSU title game projections
Jan 8, 2020, 3:15 PM
|
|
Spot The Ball
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [200]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
and e=mc2... v=ir... who cares let’s play***
Jan 8, 2020, 3:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [37033]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 16331
Joined: 2008
|
STATS
Jan 8, 2020, 3:19 PM
|
|
inside
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [38740]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 33357
Joined: 2011
|
Re: TNET: Advanced outlook: Clemson-LSU title game projections
Jan 8, 2020, 3:39 PM
|
|
I don't believe ANYBODY is putting 38 points on CBVs defense right now .
Alabama had a similarly great O last year right ? 16 pts .
Ohio State had the #1 offense two weeks ago right ? 23 points , which was our MOST allowed this season .
I think LSU is capable of 30 , but will they get there ? I'd bet against it .
I say 34-27 Tigers in Orange .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16911]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 21862
Joined: 2007
|
Re: TNET: Advanced outlook: Clemson-LSU title game projections
Jan 8, 2020, 8:57 PM
|
|
I totally agree with you, Tigerdug! I've about heard enough of these, so called "experts". Remember, a spurt is just a drip under pressure. Spot the ball! I ain't scared!
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [614]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
I'm not a statistician, but really?
Jan 8, 2020, 4:49 PM
|
|
Who in the hell thinks that defense can hold Clemson under 35. Final score be ###### that's just stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [42014]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43486
Joined: 1998
|
more stats that a corn dog
Jan 8, 2020, 6:40 PM
|
|
spot the damnn ball
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2661]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: TNET: Advanced outlook: Clemson-LSU title game projections
Jan 8, 2020, 6:58 PM
|
|
Here's a stat for you. Most of TLs stats came in the first half of the game plus 1 drive in the 3rd qtr. I didnt watch all of lsu's games but it seems that ole Joe played through most of the game. Etienne, Ross, Higgins all were done after said 1st drive of 3rd qtr. If we're talking stats, where would we be if the starters had played through a majority of the 4th qtr? Dabo would really not be liked if he was hanging 80 points on most teams.
Go Tigers!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16911]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 21862
Joined: 2007
|
Re: TNET: Advanced outlook: Clemson-LSU title game projections
Jan 8, 2020, 9:00 PM
|
|
I just can't wait to hear all the lamentations from all the pundits who, once again, don't see any way that their SEC "darlings" could possibly lose to a lowly ACC team like Clemson. BUT, they will!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2387]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Interesting stats... but the game ain't played on paper
Jan 8, 2020, 9:43 PM
|
|
it's played on turf. Enough talk... spot the d a m n ball and let's get it on!
Tigers in Orange 42
Bayou tigers 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1891]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: TNET: Advanced outlook: Clemson-LSU title game projections
Jan 8, 2020, 11:26 PM
|
|
We just beat a team with the heisman runner up and then we’ll take care of the heisman winner in a few days. Once we do this you can all officially say that we are witnessing a dynasty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27541]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 47993
Joined: 2010
|
Sorry... I've already said that and I'm not taking it back.
Jan 8, 2020, 11:42 PM
|
|
A win would supplant Bama, but regardless, "The Best Is Yet To Come".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
