|
Replies: 46
| visibility 302
|
Orange Blooded [3981]
TigerPulse: 91%
35
|
Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 25, 2018, 6:16 PM
|
|
Dee I will get hurt. Edwards is a possession receiver. She Smith is decent. Ortre Smith is slow.
The Gamecocks remind me of a sales guy trying to keep his job. “ Next quarter is going to be huge!”
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3981]
TigerPulse: 91%
35
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 25, 2018, 6:16 PM
|
|
Deebo
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6461]
TigerPulse: 95%
40
Posts: 13148
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 25, 2018, 6:33 PM
|
|
Those are 2 really really good WRs and 2 with great potential.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [21]
TigerPulse: 27%
3
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 26, 2018, 2:55 PM
|
|
Edwards is not really really good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17658]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11061
Joined: 2008
|
Compared to their history they are.***
Jul 25, 2018, 6:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12131]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
Doesn’t matter how good the WRs are
Jul 25, 2018, 6:37 PM
|
|
If the QB is flat on his back eating the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1936]
TigerPulse: 84%
31
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 25, 2018, 6:41 PM
|
|
I hope Deebo doesn't get hurt. Sounds like you do too
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1543]
TigerPulse: 80%
30
|
That is strong group.***
Jul 25, 2018, 6:42 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1878]
TigerPulse: 98%
31
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 25, 2018, 6:48 PM
|
|
Maybe what Walt meant was they have a good group as far as the mighty SEC is concerned. Deebo is a cute player who might provide some good depth at the 2 but isn’t beating out Amari coming off of an injury and fully healthy isn’t in the same realm of talent as DK.
Edwards I assume is the second best WR? He is so good he had a safety offer to Clemson so his ability to compete against Tee, Trevion, Overton and company isn’t really debatable. The third option Shi Smith couldn’t get any offer to Clemson so he definitely wouldn’t compete.
Other than that ya they are pretty darn good. Add in the immense talent at QB for SCar and combined those receivers could top 100 yards against Clemson this year (combining their stats from previous 2 games of course)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1433]
TigerPulse: 100%
29
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 25, 2018, 7:57 PM
|
|
Clemson didn’t land these guys bc we found better WRs out of state but that doesn’t take away their ability. They do have some good wrs but we got a great defense, just bc Walt praised them doesn’t mean they are going to beat us or anything. No need to bash the kids bc they play for Coots if we didn’t land tee or Amari I know we would have went after and would have got those same guys so they are good wrs. But not on level with ours go Tigers!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1878]
TigerPulse: 98%
31
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 25, 2018, 8:08 PM
|
|
Hey I did say they had a few cute receivers to my credit. That’s my way of not bashing them. I said they were good for SEC receivers... just happens that puts them 3 or 4 on each of our WR positional depth chart.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [567]
TigerPulse: 94%
20
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 25, 2018, 8:12 PM
[ in reply to Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver ] |
|
You sound like a homer. Edwards is better than Overton and Thompson. Overton has a chance to prove me wrong this yr, but until then Edwards>>
Idk if Amari is better than Deebo yet. One is coming off an injury and other is a 1st time starter. I'm looking fwd to seeing both stats after this yr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14488]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 11103
Joined: 2012
|
Edwards better than Overton & TT??
Jul 25, 2018, 8:14 PM
|
|
Say what?
Both of those guys would have been 3 year starters by this point had they been at SC
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [567]
TigerPulse: 94%
20
|
Re: Edwards better than Overton & TT??
Jul 25, 2018, 8:58 PM
|
|
Edwards would've passed both Overton and Thompson on the depth chart. I get it it's not kool to say anyone of that team is good. I'm not gonna argue about who's better. Overton has a chance to prove his worth this yr. Until then Edwards is better than both and right now it's not close.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1878]
TigerPulse: 98%
31
|
Re: Edwards better than Overton & TT??
Jul 25, 2018, 9:00 PM
[ in reply to Edwards better than Overton & TT?? ] |
|
Yes I agree CU2013. Don’t confuse stats wit talent. Overton and TT couldn’t get on the field due to the talent ahead of them. However, they both are more talented and absolutely would start over Edwards. Edwards just has the fortune of having no one else to challenge him at the 9. He’s a good athlete, which is why he had an offer to play safety for us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [56649]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 44353
Joined: 2003
|
..and there you have it in a Watermelon shell.***
Jul 25, 2018, 9:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6461]
TigerPulse: 95%
40
Posts: 13148
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Edwards better than Overton & TT??
Jul 26, 2018, 7:12 AM
[ in reply to Re: Edwards better than Overton & TT?? ] |
|
Lmao. Overton has tons of talent but he is right. Edwards is the better WR of the 3 without question. Just because we offered as a S instead does not mean he didn't turn out to he a dang good wr. Now Thompson and Overton may show us something great this year to close the gap on this argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2217]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Edwards has outperformed
Jul 26, 2018, 7:31 AM
|
|
TT and Overton on the field no doubt. But if the roles were reversed either one of our guys would’ve had just as much production. Edwards hasn’t had to fight 5 star guys on the depth chart he was a starter from day 1 basically.
Who here would actually say Edwards would be a starter for us? And Deebo is a fantastic returner and a good slot receiver, but I don’t think he’s a guy that can put a whole team on his back and carry them to victory over a team with substance.
Remember they also lost Hurst who Bentley loves to use as a safety valve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6461]
TigerPulse: 95%
40
Posts: 13148
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Edwards has outperformed
Jul 26, 2018, 8:29 AM
|
|
Not many good WRs can put a team on their back and carry them to a W over a good team. Deebo did do it last year tho so give him credit. We were lucky enough to have Sammy, Nuk, and Williams come through who could do that. Not sure if Edwards would start for us this year as I do believe Higgins has more talent but Edwards would be fighting for that spot. The kid is dang good with amazing potential to be a good NFL WR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
Re: Edwards better than Overton & TT??
Jul 26, 2018, 7:34 AM
[ in reply to Re: Edwards better than Overton & TT?? ] |
|
Edwards is a stud. He is going in the top 2 rounds of the NFL draft when he goes more than likely, at worst 3rd I bet. Deebo Samuel is going ahead of him maybe. The Coots have good WR's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 93%
10
|
Re: Edwards better than Overton & TT??
Jul 26, 2018, 7:52 AM
|
|
"Edwards is a stud. He is going in the top 2 rounds of the NFL draft when he goes more than likely, at worst 3rd I bet. Deebo Samuel is going ahead of him maybe. "
Carlsbad - I want to agree here as both are very good at WR. I have to disagree because their body of work might not be good enough to go that high. USUC has to beat some QUALITY teams like UGA and CLEMSON and those guys excel in those games against good defenses. I don't see USUC doing that, so those two guys might wilt on the vine at draft time. You probably don't have to look any further than our own Deon Cain not getting drafted very high like he probably should have. His body of work was lacking due to the lack of awesome catches, etc.
JMO though, and I haven't slept at Holiday Inn Express lately, so I might be wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6461]
TigerPulse: 95%
40
Posts: 13148
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Edwards better than Overton & TT??
Jul 26, 2018, 8:43 AM
|
|
Some people just cannot give credit where it is due. They argue our guys stats would be as good if not better if they were in Edwards position at Usuck. I don't know what his stats are and do not care. If you watch a game you can look at him and see that he is an NFL talent at wr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
Re: Edwards better than Overton & TT??
Jul 26, 2018, 8:51 AM
|
|
Exactly
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4980]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Edwards better than Overton & TT??
Jul 26, 2018, 8:12 AM
[ in reply to Re: Edwards better than Overton & TT?? ] |
|
You sound like your recruiting for SCar. A decent player going to a bad team can make them look great, but they would still be well down the depth chart at Clemson. I'm not 100% convinced Deebo would see much PT after his injury. Amari and Derion Kendrick are both stars. No Clemson receiver will see the production, due to depth, but if one does then our offense is blowing people off the field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5919]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: Edwards better than Overton & TT??
Jul 26, 2018, 8:26 AM
[ in reply to Re: Edwards better than Overton & TT?? ] |
|
You think Edwards will go in the second round or better, more than likely, and Deon Cain and Ray Ray went in the 6th round?
Want to make a $100 bet that Edwards goes in the top 3 rounds?
You said you'd bet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1096]
TigerPulse: 99%
25
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 25, 2018, 7:08 PM
|
|
Okay I wouldn’t take it that far now. They’re pretty deep at wideout 1-4. But after that they fall off and that’s why we win 12+ games while their stuck winning 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9505]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 25, 2018, 7:44 PM
|
|
If they had a qb to get them the ball, they might be decent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [38958]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 22308
Joined: 2003
|
They More Remind Me of a Finance Manager That Thinks
Jul 25, 2018, 7:45 PM
|
|
They know something about business but only can spew quips and quotes they hear from those that deliver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12109]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 25, 2018, 7:54 PM
|
|
Yep, they have an entire team that excels at receiving beat downs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [78905]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 36494
Joined: 2003
|
Well, they had a loaded coach for years.....
Jul 25, 2018, 8:16 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11351]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
The coots being loaded at receiver...
Jul 25, 2018, 8:30 PM
|
|
is like Mark Richt owning a snowmobile in Miami.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 93%
10
|
Re: The coots being loaded at receiver...
Jul 26, 2018, 7:55 AM
|
|
...or like driving a Porsche 911 turbo in heavy traffic. 
oh wait...make that a Honda Civic.
JK - those guys will be fine and have a good year IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13856]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 23086
Joined: 2004
|
Why will Deebo get hurt?
Jul 25, 2018, 8:51 PM
|
|
People said the same thing about Watson after his FR year and then he played two brilliant seasons without missing a game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3631]
TigerPulse: 96%
35
|
Re: Deebo will get hurt
Jul 25, 2018, 9:35 PM
|
|
Because they will overuse him.
The Gamecocks are always looking to take shortcuts, and they want their fans to get excited, so they will take their one player with star power and anoint him their designated star. He is a legitimate threat to go the distance on any play, like Spiller without as much speed. So in typical Gamecock fashion, they will try to use their "home run hitter" every At Bat. All those other guys that could be threats if their offense knew how to distribute the ball will not reach their potential with Deebo on the field.
Now they might have a real OC this year, so it's too early to say; but Muschamp is always inclined to give the fans what they want. And what they want is a star they can promote. Gamecock fans are wannabes, so they are gonna hitch their wagon to Deebo and hope he survives.
They've been this way since at least the days of George Rogers. That's when i noticed, and it's never changed, even through coaching changes. It's just their sad culture. And they frequently get their stars hurt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1350]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: Deebo will get hurt
Jul 26, 2018, 2:52 PM
|
|
This.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [300]
TigerPulse: 86%
15
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 25, 2018, 9:07 PM
|
|
Connor Shaw is probably my all time favorite gamecock player. That kid was a baller. Play maker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1878]
TigerPulse: 98%
31
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 25, 2018, 9:13 PM
|
|
Not sure what this has to do with their average WR group but I can respect that. I hate Connor Shaw in a good way that I respect his game and he seems like a good guy, meaning I don’t actually hate him just hard to give him credit bc he beat our tails. He reminds me of a less talented Deshaun. Knew every time he had the ball he was gonna give it is all to win. If he was blessed with the talent of Deshaun those 2 would have had epic battles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3925]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Walt says GT is our biggest threat in the ACC every year
Jul 25, 2018, 9:12 PM
|
|
EVERY YEAR!
Walt has no credibility
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 26231
Joined: 2011
|
They're the best receiving corps in all 'Merica.
Jul 25, 2018, 9:12 PM
|
|
'Cept no one will ever know it 'cause their numbers will just be average.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 26, 2018, 7:14 AM
|
|
They have great WR's. They do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5151]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17128
Joined: 2005
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 26, 2018, 8:01 AM
|
|
Why are you so insecure about USC?
You can acknowledge we have some real nice pieces at WR while at the same time acknowledging Clemson as a team is still at least 3 scores better than we are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 26, 2018, 8:41 AM
|
|
Why would we worry about a school in California? We aren't insecure about them or any school for that matter. As far as the South Carolina Gamecocks, we don't like to give you guys credit. I don't mind though. You have really good wr's. Everyone who follows closely knows that. The rest of your team sucks though.
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospect-rankings/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [30584]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 17617
Joined: 2008
|
Re: Walt said South Carolina is loaded at receiver
Jul 26, 2018, 2:31 PM
|
|
I would second your comments about Southern Cal. Why in the world would we be concerned with them?
Regarding USuCk, well, bless their little chicken hearts. They're nothing but a bunch of losers with a 'Bama mouth and a Vandy trophy case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [30584]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 17617
Joined: 2008
|
Re: Compared to what they've had in the past, sure I'll buy
Jul 26, 2018, 2:29 PM
|
|
that. Compared to us? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1350]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
They should be okay vs. Kentucky and Vandy. LMFAO***
Jul 26, 2018, 2:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1350]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Can't get the ball to them with Bentley laying on his ###***
Jul 26, 2018, 2:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 46
| visibility 302
|
|
|
50
