Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
In previous conversations, quite a few of you were against this
General Boards - Politics
add New Topic
Topics: Previous | Next
Replies: 38
| visibility 451

In previous conversations, quite a few of you were against this

1

Apr 17, 2024, 10:56 AM
Reply

and I said I'd be for it. I'm still for it...I think it's a good move (as a staunch "China Hawk").

Ole Joe tripling down on Donnie's "trade war" on Chinese steel, you say? Bring it, #### China.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/04/17/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-new-actions-to-protect-u-s-steel-and-shipbuilding-industry-from-chinas-unfair-practices/

So we think tariffs are bad?

Or we think tariffs are bad when the other team comes up with em?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Tariffs just mean another tax, and they both = inflation.

1

Apr 17, 2024, 10:58 AM
Reply

Its not like they will just pay the tax and not pass it on to the consumer.

Seems like more inflation to me.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

not according to


Apr 17, 2024, 11:01 AM
Reply

"a senior official in the administration" anonymous...hmm, why?

“If taken these actions will not increase inflation, but they will protect American jobs and steel industry,” the official said on a call with reporters. “Residual inflation is not coming from goods, these actions will not change that.”

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/04/17/biden-wants-to-triple-china-tariffs-on-steel-aluminum-imports.html#:~:text=President%20Biden%20will%20call%20to,energy%20products%20subsidized%20by%20Beijing.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm certain that's what they say


Apr 17, 2024, 11:53 AM
Reply

I'm also certain they are wrong.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It's okay... Their media will cover for them.***


Apr 17, 2024, 12:09 PM
Reply



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Anyone with actual knowledge knows that Biden has been MUCH tougher....


Apr 17, 2024, 11:10 AM
Reply

on China than Trump was. It's not even close. Biden has really gone after China's chip industry.

I'm actually not someone that likes trade wars. When Trump did his wars, they were essentially a joke. They didn't really hurt China, but they ended up forcing a big farm bailout cost on the US Taxpayers. The fact that Biden kept alot of those tariffs in place bothered me. But at least he added components that are actually hurting China.

If we're going to do a trade war - which again, I'm not really comfortable with that - it might as well be effective.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yea, He and Hunter had some strong words for China via WhatsApp

2

Apr 17, 2024, 11:15 AM
Reply

The very next week; millions of dollars in their shell corps. That's being tough.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Where's my fly swatter?... Better yet, where's that wasp spray?***


Apr 17, 2024, 11:22 AM
Reply



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I take offense to that

1

Apr 17, 2024, 11:24 AM
Reply

haha

he makes us look bad

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Selectively specific.***


Apr 17, 2024, 11:47 AM
Reply



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


They're still bad


Apr 17, 2024, 1:09 PM
Reply

Are Trump people now opposed to them?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


How do you compete with countries that essentially use slave labor

2

Apr 17, 2024, 1:15 PM
Reply

without them? We can't become a service economy and maintain global dominance, you have to level the playing field in manufacturing somehow.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-lakebum1-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Which in turn raises costs and hurts the supply change

1

Apr 17, 2024, 7:27 PM
Reply

And can bring us closer to trade wars, which aren't good for anyone. "When goods don't cross borders, troops will."

If y'all favor tariffs here, then you can't come back later and complain about rising costs. You think American companies won't gouge us all in return? Hell, they're already doing it and lying about "inflation costs".

And dang if y'all ever get to insinuate in a conversation that I'm leftist again. This is a very conservative stance I'm taking. Tariffs stifle economic growth.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


I don't buy that they're gouging us, frankly I think it's a miracle

1

Apr 18, 2024, 10:09 AM
Reply

things haven't gotten worse. Have you tried to ship anything lately? Fabricate anything? Prices for materials, shipping, and labor have all dramatically increased.

We have to generate wealth...you do that by producing/manufacturing goods. Looking at rising costs alone is a silly way to gauge things, you have to look at the overall picture, and outsourcing all of our production is not only a national security risk, it reduces our ability to make money.

What do you think happens when somewhere like China has a 15% tariff on imported vehicles, but we only have a 2.5% ? Who benefits when someone like BMW moves their new production line to China? We certainly don't, sure it might help keep the cost of your new 3 Series down, but it's at a huge expense to the American economy via all of the jobs and supporting businesses that line would have bolstered here. This is the big picture a lot of people seem to miss.

There's also much less risk to the supply chain if you can source domestically. Covid, the Japanese tsunami, and a number of other events have shown us how risky relying on global supply chain infrastructure can be. Here's a good example: You know what Kubota did after the Japanese tsunami when they couldn't get tractors to the US market? They built a huge facility in Georgia bringing in tons of jobs and supporting surrounding businesses. Same principle applies here, we can use our market size as leverage to bring manufacturing in.

Free trade only works when you have fair trade, and we don't currently have that with countries like China.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-lakebum1-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Their profits are soaring


Apr 18, 2024, 11:37 AM
Reply

Especially grocery stores. Yeah, costs have gone up, but they're also raising them even higher as an excuse. The inflation isn't as forced as they'll have you believe.

I'm a little surprised you're taking this stance; I've felt you've been a big proponent of lesser government. History shows us that when the fed sticks their hands too much into the market, bad things happen.

Keeping tariffs low or non existent keeps our prices down. It fosters stronger trade with all parties. Yes, I agree, China doesn't play fair. More tariffs won't get them in line; they'll play even dirtier and then we'll pay for it.

I get the sentiment behind tariffs, but they've been proven to create more problems for the economy and the consumers. And we're already tariffing them on steel. Finally, this feels like a cheap ploy by Biden for votes. I don't like the short-sightedness.

There's also much less risk to the supply chain if you can source domestically. Covid, the Japanese tsunami, and a number of other events have shown us how risky relying on global supply chain infrastructure can be. Here's a good example: You know what Kubota did after the Japanese tsunami when they couldn't get tractors to the US market? They built a huge facility in Georgia bringing in tons of jobs and supporting surrounding businesses. Same principle applies here, we can use our market size as leverage to bring manufacturing in.


And why do those companies come to GA or SC or other states like us? Because we keep the taxes down.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Are you insinuating youd like to see price controls then?


Apr 18, 2024, 11:58 AM
Reply

A lot of things are cyclical, what were their margins like a few years ago? Sometimes you just have to make hay, I don’t fault them for profiting.

I generally am, but the govt is already massively involved via rules, regulations, and taxes….I’m not necessarily saying all of those things are bad, but it creates an unlevel playing field for domestic producers. So my stance is that there needs to be a counterbalance to that. Otherwise we watch all of our manufacturing base disappear to other, cheaper countries and our population becomes a bunch of baristas who can’t really afford anything anyway, so lower prices don’t mean squat. We have watched this play out for several decades now.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-lakebum1-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Absolutely not


Apr 18, 2024, 12:43 PM
Reply

Not sure how you thought I would insinuate that; I said clearly that I want as little fed interference as possible.

I don't fault them from profiting, either, but it needs to be put in perspective for inflation woes, and that's why I don't trust our companies at home if tariffs are levied. They'll use it as an excuse to increase costs.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


define bad


Apr 17, 2024, 2:29 PM [ in reply to They're still bad ]
Reply

I'd probably use painful. A little too nuanced in the long-term to use "bad". And also depends on other positions you may have.

and this, using Establishment approved Newspeak here, would be transitory...in theory....right?

I can't find my old post (search is completely dead for me), but I wrote a couple posts way back when agreeing with Biden on a few things.

So idk if that was a dig at me, a proverbial screaming at the polarized clouds, or just simulation autopilot there bro

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Not a dig at you


Apr 17, 2024, 7:24 PM
Reply

Tariffs, in the long run, make problems worse, raise costs, and hurt the supply chain. I'm in favor of letting the market do its thing.

EDIT: The economy and rising costs have been a complaining point for Trumpists (I'm not citing you here). But if they now favor this move, well... then they're favoring Biden raising costs. IMO, this is an election ploy by Biden but also sets up a nice moment of hypocrisy for Trumpers.


Message was edited by: Catahoula®


2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


The hypocrisy is you trying to justify a 180* flip-flop...***


Apr 17, 2024, 7:40 PM
Reply



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


we're aligned on the sentiment

1

Apr 18, 2024, 9:34 AM [ in reply to Not a dig at you ]
Reply

and broader market outlooks / consequences. I won't get into the politics of the situation b/c I don't really care for it.

as you know, I'm pretty staunchly anti-government, and lean more towards an anarcho-capitalist view than anything else - thanks to you guys pushing me to figure out what I like and ####.

so, this is an absolute ironic, "against my ethos", perplexing position for me to take, I get that.

BUTTTTTT

what're the other options?

We can't rely on the market because the market is being swayed by a more centrally planned regime than we have. And that centrally planned regime is obviously doing what they can to undercut us at every turn. From an FX, trade, military, data, friggin you name it, they're coming for us.

By letting the market do its thing, in this instance, we look up in a generation and we're $36T in debt with a electorate / workforce getting more useless and stupid by the decade. Our GDP is propped up by government spending, and our capacity to be self sufficient as a nation mimics that of a 7 year old, despite having nearly all of the resources and human capital necessary to achieve such an objective (hell, we were there like 40 years ago).

I'm open to relying on our trade partners in this hemisphere. I myself have used thousands of tons of Korean steel (like someone else mentioned). I'm open to FAIR trade in free markets.

But #### China. We need to bury them and then step on their ####### chest after we run them over and start highstepping it into the endzone.

On the flip side, the way I see it, costs of doing business in the US are increasing. To bring back true GDP here, we've got to circumvent this and (although I hate saying this with all of my might) curb our adversaries from manipulating any markets that directly compete with US entities. The only way I can see to do that is for the government to put their thumb on the scale.

All this boomer #### over the last 40 years got us in this mess. And they're mostly the ones bitching about it.

I'd wager 75% of American billionaires (not in media or tech) leveraged Chinese manufacturing and cheap labor to get there.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The other options aren't great

1

Apr 18, 2024, 10:08 AM
Reply

It's kind of a ###### if you do, ###### if you don't scenario. I side with the market on this one because, as you said, I'm pretty anti-government as well, particularly when it comes to the market. Historical data on tariffs and fed interference isn't great, and I think the price we pay to #### China isn't worth the blowback.

Plus, China is going to play dirty regardless. They'll find a way around and they'll retaliate with other economic means. We know they're our enemy, but our economies are too #### linked to escalate into a shooting war right now.

I also don't trust our businesses back home to not screw us over if we slap on tariffs. Competition is healthy in the long run, even if it's from a dirty foreign adversary. As flow already mentioned, we're already tariffing this #### as it is.

And I agree; thanks a lot, Boomers.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


I don't make or manufacture anything that doesn't involve Sudafed


Apr 17, 2024, 1:10 PM
Reply

so I am against anything making products that I buy more asspesive

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I like your funny words magic man


like artificially increased


Apr 17, 2024, 2:25 PM
Reply

government mandated wages?

cost of capital?

regulatory costs to conduct business?

costs to run the government?














couldn't resist boo <img border=">">

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Bad idea under Trump, bad idea by Biden.

3

Apr 17, 2024, 6:22 PM
Reply

China only supplies us with 2% of our steel imports (possibly much smaller now) but if this causes prices of steel internationally to increase (which it likely will) it'll cause an increase in our manufacturing costs that uses that steel. This will only hurt the workers and consumers, which they know, but they're banking on the idea that because the amount of steel coming from China is so small, the "hurting" will only be felt minimally and dwarfed by the political "win".

Biden should not follow Trump's ###### here.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Agreed. Feels like a bad election ploy, too.***


Apr 17, 2024, 7:29 PM
Reply



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


'tis the season!***


Apr 17, 2024, 8:16 PM
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: In previous conversations, quite a few of you were against this


Apr 17, 2024, 7:39 PM
Reply

Chalk me up as anti-tariffs. Open up trade, let’s all be cool w each other and swap stuff. Tariffs are taxes on the consumer, and I don’t like taxes.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

ok, let's set up a hypothetical use case

1

Apr 18, 2024, 9:39 AM
Reply

You're as assdoctor. You have an awesome practice with excellent doctors, from all over, that services the metro Charlotte area. (idk where TF you are, doesn't matter, hang with me).

Next door, this lot starts breaking ground. Sign pops up, coming soon, Chenchei Healthcare.

huh, that's weird, who are these guys?

oh ####. they're funded by a PE conglomerate in China. oh double ####, they can charge a quarter of what you're charging because they're backed by the PRC getting their version FedCoin cranked into their balance sheets.

oh triple ####, all your customers are going there to get treatment.

oh quadruple ####, they're only doing it to gather data on american citizens and get their foot in the door to American healthcare and insurance.

is that a free market?

idk if this is even remotely plausible as I have zero clue what the regulatory agencies allow or disallow in your respective verticle. however, this use case stands as a reasonable comparison when talking global commodities trades of metals, minerals, chips, processors, etc. on a much larger scale.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: ok, let's set up a hypothetical use case

1

Apr 18, 2024, 10:36 AM
Reply

In that hypothetical I guess I would say that while I may not like it, I’m not sure asking the government to shut them down or force their prices artificially higher is compatible with free market capitalism and minimal government intervention, and it would be incumbent upon me to either price my services competitively, or provide a service that is demonstrably higher quality and market myself as such. Or I could enter a less competitive market.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm with you man, in principal and practice


Apr 18, 2024, 11:25 AM
Reply

but know that such position would put you out of business due to unfair market conditions funded by an adversarial state.

that exact sentiment is the genesis of the Chinese strategy lol

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You had such an unprecedented rise


Apr 17, 2024, 7:53 PM
Reply

in consumer sales/purchasing after COVID. We locked everyone down, they couldn’t move and received either their salary working from home or were furloughed and got a small pay and a large govt check.

That led to unprecedented online and retail sales. Warehouse space and the need for supply chain materials like steel, rubber for conveyors, forklifts and even truck drivers were through the roof.

But now everyone has caught up. And the old days of 20/30/40% sales increase is GONE. It’s back to 2-3%…if lucky.

So now the conundrum is an excess of warehouse space and material.

They will play this how they want, but they will tax and tariff all they can to make up the lost revenue.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


If you're pro-massive inflation then this policy is for you...

2

Apr 17, 2024, 8:46 PM
Reply

We already have a 25% tariff on steel and AL products from China (amongst other things) and it's still hard to find a new domestic vendor for these type items and when you do find a source they are almost double the landed price of the item from China.

It's a horrible idea.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm not discounting this as a consequence


Apr 18, 2024, 9:45 AM
Reply

and to be fair, we already have massive inflation.

And we've had issues finding suppliers as well. It won't be painless.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Sounds like we should roll back regulations that hinder domestic


Apr 18, 2024, 10:23 AM [ in reply to If you're pro-massive inflation then this policy is for you... ]
Reply

steel production so the US can be more competitive.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-lakebum1-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Sounds like we should roll back regulations that hinder domestic


Apr 18, 2024, 10:38 AM
Reply

What regulations though? Those protecting laborers? Those protecting the environment?

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I would think environmental regulations probably play the biggest role in


Apr 18, 2024, 10:48 AM
Reply

cost of production, but I'm not overly familiar with steel manufacturing either. We'd need our resident Steeler Ryanadidas to comment on that.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-lakebum1-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Could be...I'm not really sure...


Apr 18, 2024, 2:18 PM [ in reply to Sounds like we should roll back regulations that hinder domestic ]
Reply

I've listened to some folks talk about it and it sounds to me there isn't a rush to expand domestic steel capacity because the initial construction costs and certainty that the US market can support more domestic supply. I'm not normally someone that thinks federal involvement is the preferred route, but in cases like this, instead of using tariffs and hoping for what happens, use tax incentives and other incentives to lure more steel capacity here.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: In previous conversations, quite a few of you were against this


Apr 17, 2024, 9:10 PM
Reply

Finished steel from China is a joke and cannot even be used in the nuclear industry in the U.S. (along with a list of other manufactured items from China) because the quality is so bad. In 2023, about 24% of the finished steel used in the U.S. is imported and 80% of those imports come from Canada, Mexico, Brazil, South Korea and Japan. So China says, thanks comrade Joe.

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 38
| visibility 451
General Boards - Politics
add New Topic
Topics: Previous | Next