|
Replies: 17
| visibility 3504
|
Associate AD [1012]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Clemson vs scar jr inside practice facilities
Aug 23, 2015, 9:57 PM
|
|
I keep hearing their facilities, including their new indoor facility is so much better than ours because of all the sec money; but I thought I read somewhere their indoor practice facility nearly identical to ours. Any info/ links to help?
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Time Great [89438]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 24763
Joined: 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5919]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: Clemson vs scar jr inside practice facilities
Aug 23, 2015, 10:03 PM
|
|
usc's football facilities are very good, but they are in Columbia, on Bluff Road and 3 miles from campus.
Their basketball arena is nice, but way too large for the product.
Their baseball stadium is nice but was built grossly over budget and with the new minor league team in town - may suffer an attendance decline.
They have good facilities, but the analogy of "lipstick on a pig" might apply here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [40]
TigerPulse: 93%
5
|
Re: Clemson vs scar jr inside practice facilities
Aug 23, 2015, 10:08 PM
|
|
I like ours better just because of all the Championship banners hanging up around the inside. The only banner they have is one of the OBS....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [10023]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Clemson vs scar jr inside practice facilities
Aug 23, 2015, 10:11 PM
|
|
|
|
Pretty sure this is it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
Yep that is it..
Aug 24, 2015, 8:03 AM
|
|
It looks better in the picture than in real life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
48
Posts: 25447
Joined: 2005
|
Their facilities are far behind ours***
Aug 23, 2015, 11:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1074]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: Their facilities are far behind ours***
Aug 23, 2015, 11:52 PM
|
|
There is a lot, a real lot of room for trophies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6983]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 10619
Joined: 2003
|
Re: Clemson vs scar jr inside practice facilities
Aug 23, 2015, 11:54 PM
|
|
Anything new in Cootlumbia looks much nicer than it rally is due to the slum it is in the middle of.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1497]
TigerPulse: 100%
29
|
That's exactly what I was thinking.
Aug 24, 2015, 7:31 AM
|
|
You could build a cinder block building in that area and slap some fresh paint and a metal roof on it and it will look spectacular compared to 90% of the buildings in that dilapidated warehouse district.
They have a broken down train with some new paint on it, and those people actually pay good money to sit inside it seven times a year. Go figure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [160]
TigerPulse: 100%
12
|
Nicer, doubt it...more expensive, probably
Aug 24, 2015, 7:50 AM
|
|
Clemson has the big upper hand in that they have land to build on. I don't know for sure but I bet SCar had to purchase land.
Truthfully there's not much difference between any of these indoor facilites. They are mostly just large metal buildings with a turf surface. If it's anything more that school is over spending.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [514]
TigerPulse: 99%
19
|
Re: Nicer, doubt it...more expensive, probably
Aug 24, 2015, 8:54 AM
|
|
Clemson also did not have to pay for site preparation. The
building was constructed around an existing artificial practice
field. Basically they built the walls around the field and added
the utilities for a first class indoor facility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [61741]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 43124
Joined: 1998
|
the indoor facilities are virtually identical
Aug 24, 2015, 8:33 AM
|
|
even used the same builder.
differences:
they have AC in their indoor facility and we do not (coaches did not want AC)
sf is basically the same (USC's may be a few feet taller, like that matters); both are regulation fields; you can do anything in there except punt.
we have terraces/catwalks to be able to get an elevated view for filmwork
they used a longer bladed turf than we did (matters in workouts/pro day stuff - Clemson has a faster track)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14661]
TigerPulse: 80%
49
Posts: 23153
Joined: 1998
|
Re: the indoor facilities are virtually identical
Aug 24, 2015, 9:41 AM
|
|
LOOKS LIKE WE MAY HAVE USED A LOT MORE PAINT ALSO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1012]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2913]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re:One Question
Aug 24, 2015, 9:21 AM
|
|
In one of the photos, there appear to be a lot of banners hanging. What are those for?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [67583]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 89959
Joined: 2001
|
The two facilities are nearly identical.....
Aug 24, 2015, 9:36 AM
|
|
In fact, I believe the two schools used the same General Contractor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12327]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 12618
Joined: 2003
|
one big difference, ours in in clemson theirs in cootlumbia***
Aug 24, 2015, 10:33 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 3504
|
|
|
50
