|
Replies: 31
| visibility 4604
|
All-Time Great [88991]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 24700
Joined: 2006
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Time Great [88991]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 24700
Joined: 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [206]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
Re: More here
2
May 2, 2024, 1:35 PM
|
|
Doing the D1ck kick'n boogie
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31249]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16445
Joined: 2008
|
Re: More here
10
10
May 2, 2024, 1:37 PM
[ in reply to More here ] |
|
I like the fact that Clemson is starting to play offense against a team that has been playing by the rules no opponent is allowed to see. Screw the ACC. THEY HAVE MILKED THE GOLDEN CALF TOO DANG LONG!. THE ACC HAS ALWAYS DISRESPECTED US.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [88991]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 24700
Joined: 2006
|
Me too, I was happy to see it.***
6
6
May 2, 2024, 1:42 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [34731]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 19010
Joined: 2022
|
eh. weak.
2
1
May 2, 2024, 2:12 PM
[ in reply to More here ] |
|
Anytime someone starts throwing around the word "slander" it's a sign they're losing on every other merit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21133]
TigerPulse: 85%
53
Posts: 17952
Joined: 2007
|
Slander suits win all the time
4
May 2, 2024, 2:33 PM
|
|
And the fact that this is at the complaint stage what you're saying makes no sense at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [34731]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 19010
Joined: 2022
|
Slander is extremely difficult to prove which is why
1
May 2, 2024, 5:25 PM
|
|
They very rarely win. And in this lawsuit it is a very weak argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [-48]
TigerPulse: 80%
-1
|
Re: Slander is extremely difficult to prove which is why
3
3
May 2, 2024, 9:09 PM
|
|
It is shockingly weak. It's not even an enhancement. It makes Clemson look unfocused and desperate. I'm embarrassed for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [46330]
TigerPulse: 78%
58
Posts: 34733
Joined: 2003
|
The whole lawsuit stems from desperation.
2
May 2, 2024, 11:38 PM
|
|
We have buyer’s remorse because we willingly signed a contract years ago tying us to the ACC for decades, and now we don’t want to honor it because we realized that it was a stupid deal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26732]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
|
That is the position of the ACC.
May 3, 2024, 5:40 PM
|
|
A judge will determine whether or not that position is the legally correct one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [34731]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 19010
Joined: 2022
|
I mean, it's their job to make smoke wherever they can.
1
May 2, 2024, 11:51 PM
[ in reply to Re: Slander is extremely difficult to prove which is why ] |
|
And maybe it's selective media bias so this element looks more significant than it is because it made the headlines, but it's a weak flex and I hope there's more in the stew than that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2039]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1222]
TigerPulse: 73%
27
|
Re: Slander suits win all the time
May 3, 2024, 2:39 PM
[ in reply to Slander suits win all the time ] |
|
Your actions may support slander or cause it! Which did we do?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4898]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
NOPE*********
May 2, 2024, 3:04 PM
[ in reply to eh. weak. ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [206]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
Re: Clemsons amended lawsuit made public today.
7
7
May 2, 2024, 1:44 PM
|
|
Trying to wrap my head around this -- seems like Clemson is saying the ACC has been making false assertions regarding the GoR AND that resulted in an opportunity cost cuz Clemson would have jumped ship sooner if not for the ACC's misdeeds. Is that correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8423]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 10185
Joined: 2003
|
Falsehoods about GOR made it where no other conference would
6
6
May 2, 2024, 2:01 PM
|
|
touch us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [34731]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 19010
Joined: 2022
|
Good luck proving that.***
1
May 2, 2024, 5:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31249]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16445
Joined: 2008
|
Re: Clemsons amended lawsuit made public today.
5
5
May 2, 2024, 2:16 PM
[ in reply to Re: Clemsons amended lawsuit made public today. ] |
|
That is exactly correct. If conference realignment moves swiftly, which with the revenue sharing settlement soon to be agreed on, this could really speed things up and we will be stuck with ACC chains around our neck. Clemson knows this and knows that the SEC and BIG are going to only add 2 teams or less and if we get left out and have to pony up an additional 20 million a yr. for revenue sharing, we will be screwed. Do you think the ACC or anyone in NC gives a ####?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [-48]
TigerPulse: 80%
-1
|
Re: Clemsons amended lawsuit made public today.
May 2, 2024, 9:11 PM
[ in reply to Re: Clemsons amended lawsuit made public today. ] |
|
It's impossible to get your head around because it makes no sense. Clemson did pledge its property to the ACC in the GOR, and the GOR itself says "irrevocable." This amendment was done by amateurs. It's truly ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26732]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
|
Thanks for the link.
5
5
May 2, 2024, 2:29 PM
|
|
I'm no attorney. But, I like any action against the ACC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23878]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 17935
Joined: 2000
|
Re: Clemsons amended lawsuit made public today.
4
May 2, 2024, 2:48 PM
|
|
Would be great if we get released from the ACC with 'severance pay'!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21133]
TigerPulse: 85%
53
Posts: 17952
Joined: 2007
|
It will result in settlement with Clemson paying somehwere between 100-300 mil
1
2
May 2, 2024, 3:16 PM
|
|
to leave. It was always going to end this way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [436]
TigerPulse: 90%
17
|
Re: It will result in settlement with Clemson paying somehwere between 100-300 mil
2
May 2, 2024, 3:42 PM
|
|
Clemson will not have to pay ANYWHERE close to $300 million to leave. The $100 million you mention will be at the upper end of a settlement range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21133]
TigerPulse: 85%
53
Posts: 17952
Joined: 2007
|
No one can say what you are saying with any definitive knowledge until
2
May 2, 2024, 3:46 PM
|
|
after the discovery phase or some other event in court that sways it one direction or the other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1426]
TigerPulse: 100%
29
|
Re: No one can say what you are saying with any definitive knowledge until
2
May 2, 2024, 10:19 PM
|
|
Yet you tagged 300 on it based on the same info.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31249]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16445
Joined: 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [55737]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 11274
Joined: 2019
|
Re: Clemsons amended lawsuit made public today.
8
8
May 2, 2024, 3:14 PM
|
|
I am sick and tired of being in the Anti Clemson Conference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [57464]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 23577
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Clemsons amended lawsuit made public today.
May 2, 2024, 10:15 PM
|
|
Me too! Clemson should have sued them in the 80s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [46330]
TigerPulse: 78%
58
Posts: 34733
Joined: 2003
|
Yes, how dare they not defend us when we cheated and ended up on probation!
2
May 2, 2024, 11:40 PM
|
|
Clearly our to get us. LOL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4898]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Yes, how dare they not defend us when we cheated and ended up on probation!
May 3, 2024, 12:45 PM
|
|
There was ZERO reason...NONE... to add that third year; that has b/c very clear in subsequent actions by this very league in dealing with others with much more egregious actions later on (see MIA and UNC as prime examples).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23000]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
|
I just don't care any more. Much like religion and politics and whatnot... I'm
May 2, 2024, 10:25 PM
|
|
all burnt out. I'll gladly let others daily gnash their teeth into powder. Wake me up when it's over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 31
| visibility 4604
|
|
|
50
