|
The sad reality is this. . .
storage
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
|
Replies: 21
| visibility 111
|
Orange Blooded [2245]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
The sad reality is this. . .
Nov 27, 2022, 10:11 AM
|
|
any time USuC beats Clemson, that is their National Championship. They will never win a true National Championship, much less an SEC Championship. Beating Clemson is their primary goal every year. Yesterday alone guaranteed Beamer a contract extension. While the loss, brings the heat to a 10-2 Clemson coaching staff. That’s the difference in these two programs.
That said, they deserved to win yesterday. The were the team that played like they really wanted it. Beamer is a likable coach and truly deserves better than to be relegated to Cola.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [7157]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Good lord, Cooterville U did not want it more
Nov 27, 2022, 10:14 AM
|
|
than us, our quarterback play killed us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1373]
TigerPulse: 99%
28
|
Not to mention special teams and defense…***
Nov 27, 2022, 10:17 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [54199]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 43821
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2245]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Good lord, Cooterville U did not want it more
Nov 27, 2022, 10:29 AM
[ in reply to Good lord, Cooterville U did not want it more ] |
|
If Clemson wanted it more, they would have protected the ball. Even with the ineptness at QB, our defense got burned (same safety by the way) for three TDs. They wanted it more or we would have made the adjustments necessary to win. Yes, we gifted it to them but we had an opportunity at 14-0 to put it away and didn’t. Whether you agree or not we gave up; they didn’t. Hence, the outcome.
Message was edited by: tigerpaws®
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7157]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: Good lord, Cooterville U did not want it more
Nov 27, 2022, 11:40 AM
|
|
LOL, You must have watched a different game. We did not give up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [67583]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 89959
Joined: 2001
|
Uhhhh NO !!!
Nov 27, 2022, 10:21 AM
|
|
The Capons simply took advantage of an early Christmas present from Clemson.
I'm still scratching my head over that mind-numbing three stooges kick return after the safety. Score on that possession, rather than giving it right back to them, and the game is likely over.
That and the decision to put the game on DJ's shoulders when it was abundantly clear that he couldn't consistently hit the ground with his hat.
The Dirt Peckers ranked 110th nationally in rush defense. Yet the decision was made to throw the ball on 44% of the total plays run, completing only 8 of them (just 3 in the second half). There was no need to throw it at all, because they clearly couldn't stop the friggin' run, yet we threw it nearly half of the total plays called. Totally incomprehensible !!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1445]
TigerPulse: 56%
29
|
Re: Uhhhh NO !!!
Nov 27, 2022, 10:27 AM
|
|
ranked 110th nationally in rush defense. Yet the decision was made to throw the ball on 44% of the total plays run, completing only 8 of them (just 3 in the second half). There was no need to throw it at all, because they clearly couldn't stop the friggin' run, we threw it nearly half of the total plays called. Totally incomprehensible !!!
They put 7/8 in the box all day. Their DB played man all day. They were in cover zero (no safety) multiple time. Throwing the ball was the right way to attack that defense. Execution is what failed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [933]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: Uhhhh NO !!!
Nov 27, 2022, 10:31 AM
|
|
Hey they played that same defense against Florida but UF ran the ball 45+ times for 300 yards. We were on track for that but we only ran it 37 times. Gotta pound the ball. And don’t make 3 turnovers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1445]
TigerPulse: 56%
29
|
Re: Uhhhh NO !!!
Nov 27, 2022, 11:12 AM
|
|
The difference is, they knew what they had in DJU and Shipley coming into this week. Anthony Richardson has the arm to beat you through the air. They couldn't commit 8 to the box vs Florida. The SC game plan vs Clemson this week was stop Shipley, take away DJ running threat and make DJ beat you with his arm. It was a successful game plan. They had a whole week to practice and implement it.
Beamer said earlier this year, that they reach out to teams that they're not likely to play for insights as to common opponents. I'm sure they've been on the phone with Syracuse and ND over the past month.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [54862]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 16508
Joined: 2020
|
Re: Uhhhh NO !!!
Nov 27, 2022, 10:55 AM
[ in reply to Re: Uhhhh NO !!! ] |
|
While true what you're saying but it was also apparent in the first half we had success running. It was also apparent DJ didn't have it. Great play to Williams on the coverage bust TD throw. Beyond that, no adjustments were made. If we weren't going to change qbs, then why not go with 22 personnel and just grind it... especially when it became evident the D wasn't stopping rattler. Shorten the game and pound the rock.
Just baffled. As for the Williams punt fumble. He should have been reminded by Dabo that whatever he does, 2 hands at all times and that all we needed was decent field position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [54199]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 43821
Joined: 2004
|
With those horrible coaching decisions, we deserved to lose
Nov 27, 2022, 10:31 AM
[ in reply to Uhhhh NO !!! ] |
|
And I am now completely apathetic to the next two games. Dabo’s friends and family coaching staff is killing Clemson football.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27619]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 31980
Joined: 2003
|
Several things yesterday
Nov 27, 2022, 10:48 AM
|
|
Caught my eye that I could not explain. A good QB could have had a field days against the defense that I was looking at from my seat in section US! I would have put another QB in the game for a few plays just to see what changes Beamer would make. They knew that he wasn’t good enough to beat them with his arm...
And he WASN’T!!!!
Someone with more knowledge about big boy football than me please explain the running punt into the end zone by DJ.
I don’t remember the Tigers using the toss sweep to Shipley in this game that was so successful in the last game. Obviously the gamecocks would be prepared for it but nothing was working .
A good tight end and QB could have gained some good yardage on these defensive backs.
(Sorry I should not have used the word Good and Quarterback in the same sentence,)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [54199]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 43821
Joined: 2004
|
The qb punt was a good call. The punt went a little long.
Nov 27, 2022, 10:51 AM
|
|
Reminded me of DW4 punting the ball.
What happened to the two back set?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2245]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Uhhhh NO !!!
Nov 27, 2022, 10:36 AM
[ in reply to Uhhhh NO !!! ] |
|
I do not disagree with you. We were the better team and should not have had to resort to trick plays. That tells me even the coaching staff was confused as to what to do. It was a total crap show from top to bottom. One team made adjustments at halftime, one didn’t. Yesterday was proof that if you let an inferior team hang around long enough, they will beat you. The past Clemson teams that we have come to know and love would have taken the ball on the final punt, driven down the field, and won the game. Picture proof that this staff and key personnel have regressed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1773]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Uhhhh NO !!!
Nov 27, 2022, 11:02 AM
[ in reply to Uhhhh NO !!! ] |
|
Yes, the game is under control at 16-7 and we call a play that should only be called when you’re behind. Momentum switched and we never really got it back
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5466]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: Uhhhh NO !!!...yep, you are
Nov 27, 2022, 11:43 AM
[ in reply to Uhhhh NO !!! ] |
|
spot one. Mind boggling. Every coach who had their hand in that playgroung kickoff chicanery needs to have a pay deduction of at least two weeks gross salary. One of the top five most stupid calls i have ever seen in death valley by clemson coaches and i cant remember any of the other four.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2594]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: The sad reality is this. . .
Nov 27, 2022, 10:36 AM
|
|
As bad as we played, the mail in the coffin was a fumble on a punt return with 2 minutes to play on the 40. It’s hard to point to one thing in many games, but if we kept the ball I’m sure we would have kicked a game winning field goal.
GO TIGERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27619]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 31980
Joined: 2003
|
Re: The sad reality is this. . .
Nov 27, 2022, 10:53 AM
|
|
100 per cent correct! By forcing them to punt we allowed ourselves a golden opportunity to win this terribly played game and we blew it,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [-100]
TigerPulse: 31%
-1
|
Re: The sad reality is this. . .
1
Nov 27, 2022, 10:57 AM
[ in reply to Re: The sad reality is this. . . ] |
|
Moral victories are for losers. Take your ### whooping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2245]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: The sad reality is this. . .
Nov 27, 2022, 11:09 AM
|
|
Protonmailman 72-43-4. Your best will NEVER make you anything more than little brother. Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn every now and then. I would say, act like you’ve been there, but y’all haven’t so you can’t.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [-100]
TigerPulse: 31%
-1
|
Re: The sad reality is this. . .
1
Nov 27, 2022, 10:58 AM
|
|
Since when did you become Nostradomus. Things happen in sports. Never say never. Your little run is over buying players, Dodge Chargers passing the offering plate. We all know about your corrupt way of doing things at MOO U
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 21
| visibility 111
|
|
|
|
50
