|
Dabo's use, or lack thereof, of the portal.
|
Replies: 59
| visibility 6511
|
Top TigerNet [28738]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
|
Dabo's use, or lack thereof, of the portal.
17
17
Jan 8, 2025, 3:29 PM
|
|
My observation: Haters gonna hate.
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [32248]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 18344
Joined: 2008
|
Re: Dabo's use, or lack thereof, of the portal.
18
18
Jan 8, 2025, 3:35 PM
|
|
Some people are never happy. When he didn't use the portal, they raged. When he did use the portal, they raged (too late, why did it take so long, yada yada yada).
Miserable people these Dabo haters are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
There are no such people.
7
5
7
5
Jan 8, 2025, 3:45 PM
|
|
Valid criticism isn't hate.
Objectivity isn't hate.
Avoiding sunshine pumping is not hate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [847]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: There are no such people.
14
14
Jan 8, 2025, 3:49 PM
|
|
My goodness man, give it a break!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [847]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: There are no such people.
10
10
Jan 8, 2025, 4:14 PM
|
|
And since we like to throw out credentials, I am a Limestone, Clemson and Furman alum. More importantly, I stayed in a Holiday Inn last night. 🤣🤣🤣
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22341]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 13281
Joined: 2018
|
Re: There are no such people.
3
Jan 8, 2025, 4:30 PM
|
|
So you hit the portal twice? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [847]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: There are no such people.
3
Jan 8, 2025, 4:38 PM
|
|
And still looking for my NIL checks. 🤣
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24472]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 11364
Joined: 1998
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
Your fantasies are lying to you.******
Jan 9, 2025, 3:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [847]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: Why do you hate other people's freedom of speech?******
Jan 9, 2025, 9:39 AM
|
|
For the same reason you like being a horses ***.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
I'm not, but you are FOS******
1
Jan 9, 2025, 9:40 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [847]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: I'm not, but you are FOS******
2
Jan 9, 2025, 9:46 AM
|
|
For the sake of everyone reading Tnet, just for one day, try not to be so condescending, arrogant and annoying. Please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
Why do you hate other people's freedom of speech?
Jan 9, 2025, 4:05 PM
|
|
I certainly don't. I call out those who are arrogant, condescending, annoying, and die right nasty to me. I don't generally tell them to stop posting.
If you don't like it, too bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [293]
TigerPulse: 85%
14
|
Re: Why do you hate other people's freedom of speech?
Jan 9, 2025, 6:18 PM
|
|
Bruv . . .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [100748]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 98514
Joined: 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
Said you, to yourself******
Jan 9, 2025, 3:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4344]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10916]
TigerPulse: 98%
45
Posts: 13295
Joined: 2021
|
Re: Why do you hate other people's freedom of speech?******
2
Jan 9, 2025, 7:18 PM
[ in reply to Why do you hate other people's freedom of speech?****** ] |
|
Now THAT’s a weak attempt at being a victim.
No one is hating that you have freedom of speech. Also, no one has to appreciate what you have to say.
You’ve got some miserable compadres that like to complain with you. Misery loves company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [15071]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 10693
Joined: 1999
|
Being uneducated on the subject and
15
15
Jan 8, 2025, 4:04 PM
[ in reply to There are no such people. ] |
|
constantly expressing personal lack of happiness with how someone is doing their job isn't hate either.
But it is annoying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
That's exactly what my detractors are...
1
Jan 9, 2025, 9:41 AM
|
|
...and do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1205]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4480]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: There are no such people.
2
Jan 8, 2025, 4:32 PM
[ in reply to There are no such people. ] |
|
Those suffering from DDS (Dabo Derangement Syndrom) equally are unable to display any of these.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
That's how you mispell
1
Jan 9, 2025, 9:36 AM
|
|
"Realist"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16501]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 10289
Joined: 2016
|
Re: There are no such people.
4
Jan 8, 2025, 4:43 PM
[ in reply to There are no such people. ] |
|
Blufton you need to be a permanent Bahama resident. You're just toxic!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
Wrong. The sunshine pumpers are toxic******
1
Jan 9, 2025, 9:37 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [511]
TigerPulse: 95%
19
|
Re: There are no such people.
1
Jan 8, 2025, 8:53 PM
[ in reply to There are no such people. ] |
|
Hey moron save your philosophy quotes for the idiots in Columbia
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6892]
TigerPulse: 96%
41
Posts: 13544
Joined: 2015
|
Re: There are no such people.
1
Jan 8, 2025, 9:12 PM
[ in reply to There are no such people. ] |
|
Haters gonna hate. If you don't like what Dabo is doing and talk openly about it while not taking his place and doing it yourself that is hating on him. You can try to defend yourself and call it what you want but it is what it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
False done ma, much?
1
Jan 9, 2025, 9:38 AM
|
|
Objective criticism isn't hate. Get a dictionary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [342]
TigerPulse: 100%
15
|
Re: There are no such people.
Jan 9, 2025, 9:53 AM
[ in reply to There are no such people. ] |
|
IMO, 69% tiger pulse, is all the hate I need to see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
How emotionally weak and pathetic are those 69%?
Jan 9, 2025, 4:07 PM
|
|
Snowflakes, all. Pathetic weaklings.
I don't give a fig what you or anyone else thinks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10916]
TigerPulse: 98%
45
Posts: 13295
Joined: 2021
|
Re: How emotionally weak and pathetic are those 69%?
Jan 9, 2025, 7:25 PM
|
|
If you didn’t care, then you wouldn’t dignify their comments with a response.
Yet, you respond and argue, respond and argue, respond and argue, etc etc etc …
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3869]
TigerPulse: 94%
35
|
Please explain how some portal kids would have made us elite.
Jan 9, 2025, 6:36 PM
[ in reply to There are no such people. ] |
|
And which players would you have cut to make room for them?
I can only see one - we needed more than an elite QB during the DJ years. Having an elite QB makes EVERYONE and EVERYTHING better on offense. Defense was the strength of our program, but we had mediocre QB play.
There haven’t been any other positions of need where we needed to bench someone for another guy who wasn’t getting playing time at his previous stop.
The portal isn’t moving the needle for programs. If you’re elite it wasn’t because of the portal (unless you’re talking a QB like Dillion Gabriel), and if you’re good or great it hasn’t made anyone better or elite.
The portal is fine when you have holes in your roster. He has previously signed emergency QBs from the portal. Dabo wanted a couple OL and missed. We needed immediate help at DE and we got it. And we replaced some WRs with a guy who will likely see immediate time in the rotation.
The portal isn’t some magic potion that immediately moves the needle. That’s a myth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [72]
TigerPulse: 89%
8
|
Re: Dabo's use, or lack thereof, of the portal.
2
2
Jan 8, 2025, 8:23 PM
[ in reply to Re: Dabo's use, or lack thereof, of the portal. ] |
|
Here’s the deal, objectively speaking: some expressed “rage” over Dabo not using the portal. Some “raged” over Dabo hiring Streeter, Goodwin, and some that are still on staff. I am one. I dare not say their names because people that are pro-anything-Dabo-does-no-matter-what will “rage” back at us about not knowing anything about football, etc.
So how do you think they are going to react? On here, I mean. They’ve listened to that Dabo has never made a bad decision crowd blast them for years about Streeter (they were right), Goodwin (they were right), and about the portal. So of course they are gonna double down against those of you that have bashed them for years.
Some of us noticed a serious decline happening in 19-20. Heck, after TL’s sophomore season some of us said Streeter couldn’t develop a QB.
So I say all that to say this: some of you simply can’t accept reality, so you will double down as well against those that appear to have been onto something years ago.
Note: I am not a coach. I know zero compared to Dabo. I think Dabo does what he thinks is right….for people. I think he hoped it would translate to the field. It did for him personally, so it’s possible for sure. I guess some of us are risk averse and didn’t want him to hire unprovens when we were in the position we were in.
Another note: I thought the Dabo hire was stupid in 08. I was wrong. But I’m ok with being wrong. That’s one of two ways to learn something. So yeah, go ahead and say that some are just never happy. Or, realize that possibly, just maybe, sometimes you are wrong as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2582]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
People who loudly and proudly trumpet their "objectivity"
4
Jan 8, 2025, 5:34 PM
|
|
Generally aren't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1205]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: People who loudly and proudly trumpet their "objectivity"
1
Jan 8, 2025, 5:48 PM
|
|
You're wrong.
Their opinion on any matter is objective and informed.
Yours is subjective and ignorant.
Just ask them; they will tell you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2582]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: People who loudly and proudly trumpet their "objectivity"
Jan 8, 2025, 5:53 PM
|
|
I'd rather not. I see how it treats others on here.
The smugness is strong with that one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [72]
TigerPulse: 89%
8
|
Re: People who loudly and proudly trumpet their "objectivity"
1
1
Jan 9, 2025, 3:26 PM
|
|
I am no fan of Bluffton. He’s a one trick pony. Maybe two tricks. His first one is “look at court cases” anytime anything remotely close to nil is brought up. It’s kind of annoying. We get it already. I’m a capitalist, and he is right. But, I detest what it’s done to cfb. There has to be a workaround.
But generalizing those that use the words “objectivity” and “objectively” is a tad presumptive. I used it above.
The problem is both sides can not, for the life of them, admit any wrong or falsehoods. Truly objective thinkers don’t operate that way.
Go ahead, blast me. That will show your absence of said objectivity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
As I've repeatedly said, there is a workaround for the portal.
1
Jan 9, 2025, 4:03 PM
|
|
A Congressional antitrust exemption.
NIL - very doubtful there's a workaround.
People have the right to make as much money as someone else is ready to pay.
That's especially true if the NIL clause in the House case gets dismissed on judicial review, as it may well be. Ditto if the injunction in the Tennessee case takes precedence iver a settlement in another federal court.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [72]
TigerPulse: 89%
8
|
Re: As I've repeatedly said, there is a workaround for the portal.
1
Jan 9, 2025, 4:08 PM
|
|
There you go again. I know what you’ve said. We all do. It’s not that you’re saying it, it’s that you literally talk about nothing else. It’s your right, for sure. So go ahead. But it’s not endearing at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
That's BS.
1
Jan 9, 2025, 4:14 PM
|
|
I talk about what happens in games - especially football. I post about what happens in other teams games. I talk about personnel needs.
I comment on some of other people's humorous posts.
If you don't understand that, you aren't paying attention.
Consider your post mythbusted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [847]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: That's BS.
Jan 9, 2025, 4:17 PM
|
|
Repost one such post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
How epically lazy are you?
1
Jan 9, 2025, 4:23 PM
|
|
Do your own homework. I'm not going to do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [72]
TigerPulse: 89%
8
|
Re: That's BS.
1
Jan 9, 2025, 4:31 PM
[ in reply to That's BS. ] |
|
I’m sure I’m wrong, didn’t research it. So I’ll rephrase: anytime the subject is brought up, you’re very very close to the first in line to comment. Further, I never look at who is commenting until MAYBE after I’ve read the comment. Yours are (on these subjects) virtually the same. That’s all I’m saying really. Idk if you think it’s your job or mission, but you’re persistent.
I just don’t see how people have the time to do such things. Seems really boring to me. Compared to other things. But that’s just me. I’m a workaholic for one. For two: there are so many more fascinating subjects to enlighten myself on. Instead of trying to bend others. To each their own I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
There has been a lot of repetitive "fix"
1
Jan 9, 2025, 4:43 PM
|
|
the portal or NIL ideas posted here. The same old
1. Return to the past
2. Athletes don't deserve anything more than a scholarship
3. The NCAA should regulate the portal
4. Transfers should be limited and/or have a sit out penalty
5. NIL should be capped.
6. Etc.
All illegal under current law. Yet I'm the problem for pointing it out?
Bwahahahaha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [72]
TigerPulse: 89%
8
|
Re: There has been a lot of repetitive "fix"
1
Jan 9, 2025, 4:51 PM
|
|
Your comprehension fails you. I didn’t say or elude to you being a, or “the” problem. Clearly, I said it wasn’t endearing. And I defend your right to not be endearing. Maybe I struck a nerve about it being boring to me to consume my thoughts and a lot of time. It’s your life. Repeat yourself all you want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10916]
TigerPulse: 98%
45
Posts: 13295
Joined: 2021
|
Re: As I've repeatedly said, there is a workaround for the portal.
Jan 9, 2025, 7:33 PM
[ in reply to As I've repeatedly said, there is a workaround for the portal. ] |
|
When you choose to suggest workarounds to address the NIL / portal mismanagement by the NCAA, then your posts are interesting.
When you descend into bash8ng the way that Dabo chooses to manage the portal and NIL, you are substituting your judgement as a rank amateur and portraying yourself as some sort of savant.
The first category of your posts are cerebral and engaging.
This second category of your posts are emotional and insufferable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1205]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: People who loudly and proudly trumpet their "objectivity"
1
Jan 9, 2025, 4:51 PM
[ in reply to Re: People who loudly and proudly trumpet their "objectivity" ] |
|
I wasn’t responding to you but to him and you made my point for me. Thank you.
There are no truly objective thinkers in this dispute. As such, no one should claim to be what they are not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2582]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: People who loudly and proudly trumpet their "objectivity"
Jan 9, 2025, 4:58 PM
|
|
I also was not referring to you, but to him. He’s probably in the top five most annoying posters on this site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2582]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [72]
TigerPulse: 89%
8
|
Re: People who loudly and proudly trumpet their "objectivity"
Jan 9, 2025, 5:00 PM
|
|
I agree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [72]
TigerPulse: 89%
8
|
Re: People who loudly and proudly trumpet their "objectivity"
Jan 9, 2025, 5:05 PM
[ in reply to Message removed by Author ] |
|
Objectivity is a lot like happiness. Some are objective nearly never. Some nearly all the time. But because we are emotional creatures, it’s virtually impossible to be objective always.
But one can pursue it, get better at it, and BE objective on many subjects
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [72]
TigerPulse: 89%
8
|
Re: People who loudly and proudly trumpet their "objectivity"
Jan 9, 2025, 4:59 PM
[ in reply to Re: People who loudly and proudly trumpet their "objectivity" ] |
|
I wasn’t responding to you but to him and you made my point for me. Thank you.
There are no truly objective thinkers in this dispute. As such, no one should claim to be what they are not.
Negative. Nothing I said wasn’t objective. At all. Didn’t lump you into any group or side. I also know you weren’t responding to me. So you proved my point. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2582]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
Re: People who loudly and proudly trumpet their "objectivity"
1
Jan 9, 2025, 4:10 PM
[ in reply to Re: People who loudly and proudly trumpet their "objectivity" ] |
|
It seems that way.
As opposed to the TNetters that obsessively TD pretty much every one of my posts. They aren't objective, far from it. They hate and gaslight those of us that are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13940]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 12416
Joined: 2000
|
read the board during the 2018 season, people were crying the whole time
5
5
Jan 8, 2025, 5:37 PM
|
|
people just like to cry
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [100748]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 98514
Joined: 2009
|
IDK that I'd say haters.
3
Jan 9, 2025, 9:57 AM
|
|
It's just angry housewives who look back at a man's history and remind him when he should have listened to her and let her direct his path and make decisions.
It's partly hindsight flavored with the potential tragedy which might have come had he adhered to her advise. Who knows where Clemson would be in Dabo had hired a lot of portal players?
One season of heavy portal transfers has an opportunity cost. Young players are ignored. That leads to more portal players and year after year the portal becomes the goto.
I wasn't an econ major but I understand what long term economics means when it's applied to personnel and retaining players and employees who are not seeking employment elsewhere.
Those crying about lack of portal players would ruin a good football program if things were done to suit them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3181]
TigerPulse: 70%
34
|
That's not true.
1
Jan 9, 2025, 4:18 PM
|
|
The best young guys aren't ignored. Neither are the best portal guys. Every team has the right to get the best guys they can from whichever source...as well as the junior college guys that now get extra eligibility.
Your claim about ruining a good football program isn't accurate. Now I'll wait to hear about the FSU Appeal to Outliers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [72]
TigerPulse: 89%
8
|
Re: That's not true.
Jan 9, 2025, 4:55 PM
|
|
He didn’t say the program would be ruined because of portal players. I’d bet his point is that they aren’t versed enough to maintain one.
The same could be said of those that say “the portal is garbage. We shouldn’t use it at all”
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 59
| visibility 6511
|
|
|
|
50
