|
Replies: 12
| visibility 19
|
Trainer [25]
TigerPulse: 100%
3
|
With Hopper Gone...
Feb 17, 2016, 8:38 AM
|
|
It's rough to see someone like Hopper leave the team, he had a lot of potential and made some great catches, but does this make a significant dent in our receiver core? With all the huge names we have, plus a few notable recruits coming in?
|
|
|
|
 |
Walk-On [140]
TigerPulse: 99%
11
|
Re: With Hopper Gone...
Feb 17, 2016, 8:46 AM
|
|
No dent at all. We are the strongest we have ever been at WR and continue to stock pile elite talent. Wish Hopper the best but we wont miss a beat
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [14067]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 23297
Joined: 2004
|
Well we were definitely stronger with Nuk + Sammy.
Feb 17, 2016, 8:57 AM
|
|
Granted Sammy missed several games that year and wasn't at his best for large parts of the season, but i would still take that WR corp over this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5977]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Has The Clemson Athletic Department released
Feb 17, 2016, 8:53 AM
|
|
A statement on this? If not I wouldn't believe a word TCI has to say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [14067]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 23297
Joined: 2004
|
No, he wasn't going to play barring injuries.***
Feb 17, 2016, 8:55 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [108265]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
can't replace the experience, but talent is there.***
Feb 17, 2016, 8:55 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [30]
TigerPulse: 97%
4
|
Re: With Hopper Gone...
Feb 17, 2016, 9:19 AM
|
|
I'm assuming if G-hop doesn't return that Cade Stewart will not greyshirt?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10273]
TigerPulse: 95%
45
Posts: 11806
Joined: 2003
|
Re: With Hopper Gone...
Feb 17, 2016, 9:50 AM
|
|
> I'm assuming if G-hop doesn't return that Cade
> Stewart will not greyshirt?
Don't assume as we were at 87 after NSD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3194]
TigerPulse: 99%
34
|
I don't believe it will
Feb 17, 2016, 9:58 AM
|
|
He wasnt much of an impact while at Clemson. He had a few TD catches during the 2014 season but i don't think he any last year. It will definitely give our incoming WRs a better shot at early playing time and avoiding a rs. Cain, Williams, Mcloud, Renfrow, Bell, Thompson, Powell and Overton will be our starting lineup next year while Chase will RS if i had to guess
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3313]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: I don't believe it will
Feb 17, 2016, 11:39 AM
|
|
I think you forgot about Artavis in your list of receivers. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62193]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 48106
Joined: 2000
|
IF Hopper is indeed gone, it will certainly hurt
Feb 17, 2016, 10:28 AM
|
|
from a depth perspective, BUT given the wealth of talent we have at WR, we are still in fantastic shape at that position. I mean, we still have one of the best (if not THE best) groups of WRs in the country.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [270]
TigerPulse: 97%
14
|
What is the opposite of a dent?
Feb 17, 2016, 11:37 AM
|
|
Because that's what Ghop leaving will be. He's been excess baggage his entire career. It's almost as if Dabo has been waiting until he desperately needed an extra a scholarship to push him out the door.
The list of people who would get more snaps than him this year includes:
Williams
Scott
Renfrow
Cain
McLeod
And likely 2 out of the 3 below:
Chase
Overton
Powell
I'd leave too if I was the 9th option at WR. What a shame dude never wanted to put in the work to be great. He blew his chance at making millions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1188]
TigerPulse: 88%
26
|
Re: What is the opposite of a dent?
Feb 17, 2016, 3:07 PM
|
|
Don't forget about Trevion Thompson, who will surely get significant snaps in 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 19
|
|
|
50
