|
Replies: 21
| visibility 6
|
Clemson Conqueror [11311]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 14516
Joined: 2003
|
Whether you like it or not, we beat LSU physically.
Dec 31, 2012, 11:45 PM
|
|
By the 4th qtr, they were suckin' wind, layin' down, lookin' for a TO wherever they could get it. The Clemson Tigers out-physicalled a top SEC team tonight. ESPN..put that in your pipe and smoke it@#!
|
|
|
|
 |
Offensive Star [318]
TigerPulse: 100%
15
|
Will Not Admit it
Dec 31, 2012, 11:48 PM
|
|
But the truth. Both sides took 'hits' but LSU defense was missing in action at end of game. I never would have thought that to happen. After a full season my opinion was that they were a top 5 defense. Great TIGER win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18210]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 22449
Joined: 1999
|
Re: Will Not Admit it
Dec 31, 2012, 11:53 PM
|
|
We snapped it 105 times on y'all. No wonder.
It was our defense that made that possible. Our D whipped y'all's #### except for two easy scoring plays.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20426]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 17161
Joined: 2002
|
I wouldn't characterize it as beating them physically.
Dec 31, 2012, 11:49 PM
|
|
We definately had them out-conditioned. The pace cwertainly got to them. But Tigerdroppings claims that all their players were falling like flies to stop the clock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 93%
10
|
They kinda were dropping like flies. I will not speculate
Dec 31, 2012, 11:50 PM
|
|
on the motive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [97812]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 97350
Joined: 2009
|
Neither should anyone else.
Jan 1, 2013, 1:04 AM
|
|
There is no speculation. They wanted a break from being run ragged the entire game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 93%
10
|
That, and when you get really gassed it is easier to get
Jan 1, 2013, 7:32 AM
|
|
injured.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [97812]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 97350
Joined: 2009
|
They will say what they will.
Jan 1, 2013, 1:06 AM
[ in reply to I wouldn't characterize it as beating them physically. ] |
|
We dominated them statistcially. That didn't happen because we had bigger and tougher players. We beat the hail out of them in every area except special teams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2245]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [450]
TigerPulse: 93%
18
|
Re: Whether you like it or not, we beat LSU physically.
Dec 31, 2012, 11:49 PM
|
|
I like It!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [840]
TigerPulse: 83%
23
|
TRUE DAT !!!!
Dec 31, 2012, 11:51 PM
|
|
CLEMSON TIGERS
2012 CHAMPIONS OVER THE SEC.
GO TIGERS !!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20797]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 17533
Joined: 2005
|
The box score certainly backs that up
Dec 31, 2012, 11:55 PM
|
|
100 plays to 48
Held them to 100 yards rushing
Defense had 9, 3 an outs
Out gained them 2-1
32 first downs to 9
We took a huge step forward as a physical football team tonight. Now need another one this spring
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1806]
TigerPulse: 86%
31
|
Should have been a 3TD win looking at that
Jan 1, 2013, 12:59 AM
|
|
T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 93%
10
|
According to LSU, the gamecocks and the rest of the SEC,
Jan 1, 2013, 9:02 AM
[ in reply to The box score certainly backs that up ] |
|
LSU's offense had 9 3 and outs and it had nothing to do with our defense... lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [34]
TigerPulse: 19%
4
|
Re: Whether you like it or not, we beat LSU physically.
Dec 31, 2012, 11:55 PM
|
|
I disagree. LSU's defense was very physical.
LSU's offense sucked. Since LSU's offense kept going 3 and out, it kept LSU's defense on the field.
Clemson's offense ran enough plays that it was almost like LSU's defense played 2 entire games.
It's no wonder they were tired at the end... they are human.
If LSU's offense was half-way decent, their defense would have been fresh the whole game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11311]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 14516
Joined: 2003
|
We're a lowly ACC team. We beat you up...
Jan 1, 2013, 12:09 AM
|
|
physically and mentally. Deal with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2457]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [97812]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 97350
Joined: 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [196]
TigerPulse: 90%
12
|
Re: Whether you like it or not, we beat LSU physically.
Jan 1, 2013, 9:00 AM
[ in reply to Re: Whether you like it or not, we beat LSU physically. ] |
|
Last time I checked people were telling us about how "big" and "physical" the LSU players on BOTH sides of the ball were, especially the linemen and backs.
We were told that LSU's big, strong linemen would push our defense around and that their backs would run our linebackers over.
Instead our defense was in the backfield all night, on both rushing and passing plays. Our defensive line fired off the ball, took control of the gaps, and hustled to the ball carrier. Fundamentals!
Don't try to blame your offense that you were just boosting up a few days ago. Take the loss like a man. Your team should have made you proud too. They played a heck of a game, and should be rewarded by their fans, rather than used as a scapegoat.
I'm glad I'm a Clemson Tiger, whether Chandler made the field goal or not. Our boys played with heart and tenacity, showing a bravery that is often little seen these days. If I were on the other side today I would be disappointed that we didn't win the game, but I wouldn't be selling out my offense to save face for my defense. I wouldn't be you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2585]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
I liked it....***
Dec 31, 2012, 11:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17027]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 15199
Joined: 1999
|
We are 2-0 vs toughest division in the toughest conference***
Jan 1, 2013, 8:05 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2245]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Whether you like it or not, we beat LSU physically.
Jan 1, 2013, 8:40 AM
|
|
Absolutely, they were dropping like "flies."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 21
| visibility 6
|
|
|
50
Those boys were dog #### tired! they were whipped!!!
