|
Replies: 46
| visibility 9965
|
National Champion [7731]
TigerPulse: 99%
42
|
Tyler Venables
8
8
Jan 11, 2025, 5:05 PM
|
|
110 announced signing him. So looks like he’ll be back for a 6th year. So no shot we bring in a S from the portal now.
Barnes and Griffin will start. Ricardo flashed as a freshman, so likely becomes the #3 guy.
Then a battle between Tyler, Webb, Billings, Dixon, Wilkinson and Kenan.
|
|
|
|
 |
MVP [526]
TigerPulse: 98%
19
|
Re: Tyler Venables
1
Jan 11, 2025, 5:09 PM
|
|
I know he’s a CB and only played 14 snaps before redshirting, but what do you think about Corian Gibson? What would be your way-too-early starting 11? Would you keep Henderson at RB or bring him over to the other side?
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [526]
TigerPulse: 98%
19
|
Re: Tyler Venables
1
Jan 11, 2025, 5:10 PM
|
|
**Corian Gipson** sorry
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [526]
TigerPulse: 98%
19
|
Re: Tyler Venables
1
Jan 11, 2025, 5:10 PM
[ in reply to Re: Tyler Venables ] |
|
**Corian Gipson** sorry
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7731]
TigerPulse: 99%
42
|
Re: Tyler Venables
2
Jan 11, 2025, 5:26 PM
[ in reply to Re: Tyler Venables ] |
|
Avieon, Hampton and Lukus will be the top 3. Gipson is talented enough to be the #4 CB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [592]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Re: Tyler Venables
1
Jan 11, 2025, 5:49 PM
|
|
Kiki’s didn’t show me a lot, had to play way off his man. I know some of that may be because he played injured. Gipson will have a chance to play a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3571]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Tyler Venables
2
Jan 11, 2025, 5:54 PM
|
|
Who is Kiki’s?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5811]
TigerPulse: 98%
39
|
Lol!***
Jan 11, 2025, 8:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11246]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Tyler Venables
4
Jan 11, 2025, 5:37 PM
[ in reply to Re: Tyler Venables ] |
|
He played both in HS so could see him at both. Kid is a stud and future NFL player
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7846]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: Tyler Venables
3
2
Jan 11, 2025, 5:12 PM
|
|
Daddy Ball in full effect…why are we paying him???
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11699]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Tyler Venables
1
Jan 11, 2025, 5:17 PM
|
|
I wonder if we could move Tyler to Nickel, he should have high football IQ. That said, Barnes is not accelerating at Nickel, he was much better at Safety. I think we are doing Barnes a disservice having him play Nickel because he was a stud 2yrs ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17666]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
Instead of worrying about
3
Jan 11, 2025, 5:25 PM
|
|
'Friends and family', etc., focus on the reality: come July 1 (I believe), rosters go to 105. Exactly how do you think teams will get there.
If you thought portal activity has been crazy...watch then! All those 'fish in the pond' swimming about waiting for a new pool.
Think a bit, occasionally...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11699]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Instead of worrying about
1
Jan 11, 2025, 5:37 PM
|
|
Not guaranteed yet but likely. That said, if Barnes is better at Safety than nickel, I aint too worried about Friends and Fam you speak of. I think Tyler is probably a good 2nd stringer but I think Nickel might be better as you cover TEs or RBs from backfield and not guys over the top.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1522]
TigerPulse: 87%
30
|
"Think a bit", fyi...football discussion board and I think..
Jan 12, 2025, 7:54 AM
[ in reply to Instead of worrying about ] |
|
you're triggered, short fuse-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [78916]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 29263
Joined: 2018
|
Just do what I do and don't let words hurt your feelings.***
2
Jan 12, 2025, 3:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5811]
TigerPulse: 98%
39
|
Give him an analyst role if Dabo insists
2
Jan 11, 2025, 8:53 PM
[ in reply to Re: Tyler Venables ] |
|
on having him around, but he doesn't need to be on the field. He does not possess the athleticism to fill a role in our secondary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7731]
TigerPulse: 99%
42
|
Re: Tyler Venables
1
Jan 11, 2025, 5:26 PM
[ in reply to Re: Tyler Venables ] |
|
We love 6th year player-coaches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22621]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14497
Joined: 1995
|
I am sorry but he would never see the field if we had any real depth.
4
Jan 11, 2025, 6:11 PM
|
|
When I have watched him play, he is simply not athletic enough to compete at a high level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7731]
TigerPulse: 99%
42
|
Re: I am sorry but he would never see the field if we had any real depth.
3
Jan 11, 2025, 6:20 PM
|
|
Maybe some of the young guys surprise us. I have high hopes for Ricardo and Dixon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4497]
TigerPulse: 96%
36
|
Re: I am sorry but he would never see the field if we had any real depth.
Jan 11, 2025, 6:53 PM
|
|
Maybe some of the young guys surprise us. I have high hopes for Ricardo and Dixon.
I'm interested to see what Wilkinson can do. I know we stole him from App State at the last moment but his film looked really good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [164]
TigerPulse: 57%
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [375]
TigerPulse: 89%
16
|
Re: I am sorry but he would never see the field if we had any real depth.
Jan 11, 2025, 9:19 PM
|
|
(Savage) there's a good reason you're a door greeter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2295]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4497]
TigerPulse: 96%
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21656]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 17863
Joined: 2005
|
I doubt he's getting 6 figures or anything close
Jan 12, 2025, 8:23 AM
[ in reply to Re: Tyler Venables ] |
|
He's proven depth. Glad he's back
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22621]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14497
Joined: 1995
|
Eh.***
Jan 12, 2025, 9:48 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5959]
TigerPulse: 95%
39
|
Re: Tyler Venables
1
Jan 11, 2025, 5:33 PM
|
|
I don't know Dabo, we probably should though....ooh! you
aren't Dabo,excuse me,dang,my bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7398]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
|
Barnes and Griffin are not good enough to play safety at Clemson***
1
3
Jan 11, 2025, 5:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7398]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
|
a new DC will bench them just as they would fire Mickey Conn
1
2
Jan 11, 2025, 5:40 PM
|
|
in the shake up
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9305]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
Posts: 10850
Joined: 2003
|
Money not well spent.***
1
1
Jan 11, 2025, 5:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10806]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: Tyler Venables
1
Jan 11, 2025, 6:26 PM
|
|
Tyler’s PPF grade was really low this year. Hope he can make improvement in his final year. We need the safety play to get much better next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [744]
TigerPulse: 97%
22
|
Re: Tyler Venables
Jan 11, 2025, 6:55 PM
|
|
“ I like my guys”
Hope we don’t hear the is quote in the Spring when the portal opens back up…we need a safety badly!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22621]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14497
Joined: 1995
|
Or maybe we need to find a better player?
1
Jan 11, 2025, 7:45 PM
[ in reply to Re: Tyler Venables ] |
|
Another year isn't going to make him faster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [288]
TigerPulse: 97%
14
|
Re: Tyler Venables
Jan 11, 2025, 7:42 PM
|
|
"110 announced signing him. So looks like he’ll be back for a 6th year."
I read this entire thread and still don't know who 110 is!
>
Message was edited by: Theoldlady®
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7731]
TigerPulse: 99%
42
|
Re: Tyler Venables
Jan 12, 2025, 10:26 AM
|
|
Clemsons NIL collective
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10859]
TigerPulse: 98%
45
Posts: 13252
Joined: 2021
|
Ronan Hanafin - betting that he will win starter job at safety
2
Jan 11, 2025, 8:11 PM
|
|
Despite not practicing at Safety for either the entire 2023 season (his true FR year when he was part of the WR group) or until a few games into 2024 season (when practice time is sparse), Hanafin got plays from scrimmage in key games and at important moments.
Hanafin is big, runs well, and (as seen from his special teams play on the coverage unit) a good tackler.
A full Spring and Summer and pre-season will do wonders for him.
Unless he packs on ~20 lb and gets moved to LB, then I betcha that he wins a starter job at Safety.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5811]
TigerPulse: 98%
39
|
No offense to Hanafin but I hope not
Jan 11, 2025, 9:06 PM
|
|
We should be set at Safety with Khalil Barnes, Kylon Griffin, Ricardo Jones, and Kylen Webb or Rob Billings. Hanafin could make the 3 deep with Tyler Venables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9305]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
Posts: 10850
Joined: 2003
|
Barnes is better at Nickel***
1
Jan 12, 2025, 6:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1440]
TigerPulse: 100%
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7731]
TigerPulse: 99%
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16500]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 10288
Joined: 2016
|
Re: Tyler Venables
1
Jan 11, 2025, 9:17 PM
|
|
Maybe 110 paying him in molasses based on his speed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3159]
TigerPulse: 69%
34
|
Cal he kick field goals? ******
1
Jan 11, 2025, 9:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1683]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Tyler Venables
Jan 11, 2025, 11:22 PM
|
|
Does anyone remember Tyler running full speed on a play - it was a game st home and field was wet - he tried to slow down as his foot hit the plastic and his leg and hip jerked hard? Was that the injury that has caused him to miss so much?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [146]
TigerPulse: 97%
11
|
Re: Tyler Venables
1
Jan 12, 2025, 1:26 AM
|
|
Love Tyler's smarts & enthusiasm but my, something has regressed physically with him (injury?) to where he gets separated easily from WRs. I mean, they blow right past!! Maybe he can b a player / coach
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2757]
TigerPulse: 99%
33
|
Maybe a LB next***
Jan 12, 2025, 8:49 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1077]
TigerPulse: 96%
25
|
Re: Tyler Venables
Jan 12, 2025, 9:24 AM
|
|
Think Lukus might get a look at safety as well. Not fluid enough to play press man in our defense imo.. I think safety might suit him better. Met him the other day actually.. really nice guy, but is massive to be a corner. Easily 6’3”-6’4”, just had that safety body type
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [3072]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: Tyler Venables
Jan 12, 2025, 10:03 AM
|
|
Hopefully they move Barnes back to Nickle. Not saying he is a bad safety. He just excelled at Nickle his freshman season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 46
| visibility 9965
|
|
|
50
