|
Replies: 13
| visibility 4028
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 45329
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Updated ESPN Playoff projections, rankings for Clemson after wild weekend
4
Oct 6, 2024, 9:09 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Time Great [97501]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 47639
Joined: 2009
|
Sounds interesting..playing here or playing there vs big name teams
4
Oct 6, 2024, 10:00 AM
|
|
But as Coach says..one game at a time and keep improving!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [15974]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 10142
Joined: 2016
|
Re: TNET: Updated ESPN Playoff projections, rankings for Clemson after wild weekend
6
6
Oct 6, 2024, 10:14 AM
|
|
Sounds like Sammich and others have dusted off their old speeches about Clemson's schedule from 2015 - 2020. Some things never change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [55405]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 16704
Joined: 2020
|
Re: TNET: Updated ESPN Playoff projections, rankings for Clemson after wild weekend
2
Oct 6, 2024, 10:39 AM
|
|
Nah I agree 100 % with what was written. Lot of football left. Lots of unknowns such as weather and injuries can affect play but overall our schedule is much weaker than last decade. No fault of our own, and we'll probably have an uninspired performance in one of our upcoming games but all should be easy wins.
Louisville can stress our D a bit. I actually think va tech, possibly the coots will be the most complete team we'll face. Miami can stress our D in the acc championship but imo, it's disappointing we won't face a good team until the playoffs.
People here laugh at the media narrative that playing an sec schedule is brutal but I truly believe that a tough schedule like that does help as long as you can avoid injuries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10262]
TigerPulse: 97%
45
Posts: 12807
Joined: 2021
|
Re: TNET: Updated ESPN Playoff projections, rankings for Clemson after wild weekend
Oct 6, 2024, 2:53 PM
|
|
Assuming we get to the ACC Championship game, then we’ll play against a very good (& ranked) opponent.
Both SMU and Miami are genuinely good. Not great, but good. Beating either of them would represent a high quality win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [724]
TigerPulse: 99%
22
|
Re: TNET: Updated ESPN Playoff projections, rankings for Clemson after wild weekend
1
Oct 6, 2024, 3:01 PM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Updated ESPN Playoff projections, rankings for Clemson after wild weekend ] |
|
Pitt and their QB (can't remember his name at the moment) will give our defense fits. He is one of the better QBs in the ACC and our secondary has been looking very vulnerable the last few weeks. So while we aren't facing an sec type schedule, the last half of the season's opponents will be tougher than what we've been facing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1685]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23179]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14076
Joined: 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [137]
TigerPulse: 98%
11
|
Re: TNET: Updated ESPN Playoff projections, rankings for Clemson after wild weekend
5
5
Oct 6, 2024, 11:02 AM
|
|
A “weak”league. And what is SE-She now. Kentucky loses to dirt peckers. Vandy beats Bama. Other numerous “upsets” but we are the weak league? SMDH
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [724]
TigerPulse: 99%
22
|
Re: TNET: Updated ESPN Playoff projections, rankings for Clemson after wild weekend
1
Oct 6, 2024, 3:03 PM
|
|
The acc is a weak league and that is a fact. Not sure why you're trying to dispute that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 92%
38
|
I hope and pray that we are a playoff caliber team by the time we get there
2
Oct 6, 2024, 12:26 PM
|
|
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1199]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Re: TNET: Updated ESPN Playoff projections, rankings for Clemson after wild weekend
1
Oct 6, 2024, 12:50 PM
|
|
We've got to go up 2 or 3 spots at least, right? 13? I know the SEC means more, to them... 5 top 11 lost. So that gives us... 14? 13? 12!
Just keep winning.
Go Tigers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6951]
TigerPulse: 97%
41
|
Heather seems like a DEI hire***
1
Oct 6, 2024, 12:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6951]
TigerPulse: 97%
41
|
Heather seems like a DEI hire***
1
Oct 6, 2024, 12:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 13
| visibility 4028
|
|
|
50
