|
Replies: 41
| visibility 3528
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 45332
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 1:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Athletic Dir [1158]
TigerPulse: 74%
26
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 1:32 PM
|
|
Whoever wrote that on ESPN should be fired. Ignorance written all over it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [51]
TigerPulse: 77%
6
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 1:37 PM
|
|
(Mike Francesa voice) Who Cares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27622]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 31986
Joined: 2003
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 1:43 PM
|
|
That’s really bad news. I was counting on the Tigers throwing the ball this season. Another year of “three yards and a cloud of dust” I guess. That’s what happens when you get this powerful offensive line! Where KB when you really need him?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1025]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 1:42 PM
|
|
Don't Care. Won Natty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [50570]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 14853
Joined: 2012
|
thank you ESPN
Jul 24, 2019, 1:45 PM
|
|
That will drive the best WRU team ever to be bettter........ we’ll get the last laugh as the newest Dynasty in College Football!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [41697]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43377
Joined: 1998
|
Im pretty sure we had 6 future NFL WR
Jul 24, 2019, 1:47 PM
|
|
on the team at one time
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [1]
TigerPulse: 100%
1
|
Re: Im pretty sure we had 6 future NFL WR
Jul 24, 2019, 3:29 PM
|
|
2012, specifically the Peach Bowl:
Hopkins - HOU
Watkins - BUF/LAR/KC
Humphries - TB/TEN
Bryant - PIT/OAK
Peake - NYJ
Brown - AZ/SEA
The CFA/Peach Bowl that year with LSU had the most future NFL draft picks of any postseason game that year. LSU had Reid, Mingo, Montgomery, OBJ, and Jarvis Landry playing for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17092]
TigerPulse: 91%
51
Posts: 27267
Joined: 2003
|
Bryant was suspended for that game and you also failed to
Jul 24, 2019, 4:41 PM
|
|
list Jeremy Hill and Spencer Ware as future draft picks, as well as Mettenberger, LSU's QB
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [196]
TigerPulse: 91%
12
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 1:58 PM
|
|
It was done with a formula and included players since 1998. We weren’t exactly stacked at WR until 2010 or so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8918]
TigerPulse: 92%
43
Posts: 10080
Joined: 2007
|
Bulletin board material
Jul 24, 2019, 2:07 PM
|
|
I will take it!
"Were just little ole Clemson and were not supposed to be here"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2454]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Bogus ESPN--AGAIN
Jul 24, 2019, 2:15 PM
|
|
Who so you trust fans. Our team or the laughable, bogus Espn data monster. Remember, anyone can make their point with data, just pik the right data set. Jeez, what seemingly professional bozos.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 26231
Joined: 2011
|
E-S Who?***
Jul 24, 2019, 2:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [640]
TigerPulse: 65%
21
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 2:18 PM
|
|
re-posting this for here:
David Hale posted their criteria on twitter:
1) First team All-Conference
2) Consensus First Team All American selections
3) NFL Draft Position
4) NFL Production over first four years.
The rankings started in 1998, so if it'd have been 10 instead of 20, maybe Clemson's ranked higher. Did anyone notice we were #2 for DL?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3194]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Funny, I made my list of the top
Jul 24, 2019, 2:21 PM
|
|
most important sources of college football reporting and ESPN didn't make my list. ¯\_(?)_/¯
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2460]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
This just in....
Jul 24, 2019, 2:39 PM
|
|
All info was tabulated by Paul finebaum
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9930]
TigerPulse: 56%
44
Posts: 13033
Joined: 2006
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 4:03 PM
|
|
If you worry about what ESPN thinks about, you have way too much time on your hands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 4:58 PM
|
|
Who cares..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [86410]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 81195
Joined: 1999
|
That's understandable because they went
Jul 24, 2019, 5:05 PM
|
|
back to 1998. If they had only gone back to 2010, you'd have a beef.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4815]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
To be fair; they went back to 1998.
Jul 24, 2019, 5:14 PM
|
|
So honestly we wouldn’t be in the top 10. This article seems a little like click bait to get people riled up for nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [442]
TigerPulse: 86%
17
|
Re: To be fair; they went back to 1998.
Jul 24, 2019, 5:55 PM
|
|
Rage-inducing clickbait? From TigerNet? No....
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1955]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
If I could just add a thought on this...
Jul 24, 2019, 5:24 PM
|
|
Clemson's not making ESPN's Top 10 'WRU' schools...
I like a number of people at ESPN. The company itself - I don't think too much of.
So when they come out with a crazy list like this (and since they're owned 80% by Disney) - doesn't such a list become, in reality, very Mickey Mouse?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2659]
TigerPulse: 74%
33
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 5:25 PM
|
|
THey opened teh article about Clemson and the success at WR. So they are acknowledging that we are producing WRs in the NFL. It's just the metric they are using and that metric goes back for many years . .when we didn't have too many WR propect. The fact that we are mentioned ,and a lot, is good enough for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5283]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Bless their hearts***
Jul 24, 2019, 5:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [1]
TigerPulse: 87%
1
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 6:18 PM
|
|
It begs the question whether ESPN is in the top 10 of sports media. We should do our top 10 here.
#10 The Paul Finebum show
#09...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [312]
TigerPulse: 81%
15
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 6:57 PM
|
|
I think it's pretty sad that Tigernet has to acknowledge the article at all. Sounds so desperate for respect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59956]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 61322
Joined: 2007
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 7:21 PM
|
|
And Nuke is considered to be the best WR in the NFL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12666]
TigerPulse: 86%
47
Posts: 12291
Joined: 2011
|
When was the last time LSU completed a pass?***
Jul 24, 2019, 7:32 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18408]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 10717
Joined: 2013
|
Re: When was the last time LSU completed a pass?***
Jul 24, 2019, 7:41 PM
|
|
Yeah I know right... and meechigan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16743]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 21791
Joined: 2007
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 8:27 PM
|
|
Line them all up and watch us destroy the ones they think are so hot. Wow! The can't see the forest for the trees, but some things never seem to change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [135]
TigerPulse: 73%
11
|
In all fairness
Jul 25, 2019, 12:48 AM
|
|
They did tab us at #2 as DLU
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1939]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 9:45 PM
|
|
Clemson is great yada yada yada. Clemson is over rated, N.C. game was fluke yada so on. Clemson is great again. Please just let the games begin. I try not to click on any of this crap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1939]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 9:45 PM
|
|
Clemson is great yada yada yada. Clemson is over rated, N.C. game was fluke yada so on. Clemson is great again. Please just let the games begin. I try not to click on any of this crap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7790]
TigerPulse: 97%
42
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 24, 2019, 10:46 PM
|
|
Just more fake news by ESPN clowns.......this crap never stops......Go Tigers!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6896]
TigerPulse: 99%
41
|
Re: TNET: ESPN had to go back to last century
Jul 25, 2019, 5:53 AM
|
|
to exclude us. Lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [92]
TigerPulse: 97%
10
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 25, 2019, 7:13 AM
|
|
None of our current crop of receivers were born when this data collection was started. Just shows you can make stats say anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [38595]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 33260
Joined: 2011
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 25, 2019, 8:43 AM
|
|
Wait'll next year ?
Just a lot of subjective , historical stuff that is set up for the blue-bloods .
Clemson IS #WRU , and we all know this well ahead of the curve .
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [626]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 25, 2019, 9:03 AM
|
|
It the time frame -- you do it "Current" or at the end of this decade and you get entirely different results. What has been a staple for us for decades, at least to the short Charlie Pell period, has been DL and this continues obviously. When you think historical Clemson, you don't think WRU and this is NOTHING against what we are doing now - it just takes time folks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1624]
TigerPulse: 91%
31
|
Re: TNET: ESPN doesn't include Clemson in Top 10 of 'WRU' schools
Jul 25, 2019, 2:21 PM
|
|
I read this article on ESPN, not being even listed as WRU was a head scratcher.
Easily should've been top 3 given the NFL talent we're producing. Nuk is the best WR in the NFL currently...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [16034]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 17550
Joined: 1999
|
I mean...that’s just stupid.***
Jul 25, 2019, 2:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11617]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 14226
Joined: 2014
|
Re: I mean...that’s just stupid.***
Jul 25, 2019, 4:34 PM
|
|
'Bammer's secondary would beg to differ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7258]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
this list lost all credibility
Jul 25, 2019, 9:03 PM
|
|
when they listed Mark Sanchez, and Matt Leinert as USCs premier QB's that made them "QB U" I still laugh every time I see the "butt fumble" and see all the wins USC had to vacate during leinerts tenure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 41
| visibility 3528
|
|
|
50
