|
Replies: 14
| visibility 1860
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46063
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Clemson's ranking in the final AP Top 25
2
Jan 21, 2025, 10:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Titan [49770]
TigerPulse: 77%
58
Posts: 36479
Joined: 2003
|
An improvement over 20th last year but right at our average the last few years.
1
5
5
Jan 21, 2025, 10:19 AM
|
|
2021: 14th
2022: 13th
2023: 20th
2024: 14th
Average finish: 15.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8149]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Now do Brad's***
11
11
Jan 21, 2025, 10:23 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [10015]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20260]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 14393
Joined: 2009
|
Amazing. Dabo continues to do more with less with another Top 15
5
5
Jan 21, 2025, 10:52 AM
[ in reply to An improvement over 20th last year but right at our average the last few years. ] |
|
finish and league championship with a program budget that barely cracks the Top 25 nationally. Even during a down stretch considering the historical greatness he's achieved here, he continues to have us punching above our weight every single season, and firmly in the championship conversation for what's to come.
Best coaching value in the game.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24907]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [44141]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's ranking in the final AP Top 25
1
Jan 21, 2025, 10:35 AM
|
|
Better than that Columbia team!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2480]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's ranking in the final AP Top 25
1
Jan 21, 2025, 10:52 AM
|
|
How is Ole Miss 11???? These tankings dont mean anything….
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11310]
TigerPulse: 98%
46
Posts: 13686
Joined: 2021
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's ranking in the final AP Top 25
1
Jan 21, 2025, 11:07 AM
|
|
This is an outrage!
Bama didn’t even make the Top 10!
In other news, CEO Bob Iger directs Disney Corp’s Board of Directors to agree to ge purchase of the AP and install to then Paul Slimescum as the sole arbiter of AP football rankings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2844]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Not bad, but with everything we've got coming back
Jan 21, 2025, 11:25 AM
|
|
a repeat of this in a year's time would be a disappointment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3499]
TigerPulse: 90%
34
|
We should be 11
1
Jan 21, 2025, 11:53 AM
|
|
In the playoffs means we should not be less than 12.
Beat SMU
Ole Miss and BYU did not make the playoffs. Being penalized for playing another game!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16407]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 17841
Joined: 1999
|
That's just not true. Playoffs had automatic bids. That's how we got in.
1
Jan 21, 2025, 3:06 PM
|
|
A group of sports writers has no obligation to align their opinion of the best college football teams in the country with the CFP participants.
The ranking is fine. We lost 4 games this season. But if we play consistently up to our potential in 2025, we have a real opportunity to be significantly improved. That's really what this program should be focused on right now. AP rank 14, 13, 12...meh. Good things ahead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5175]
TigerPulse: 98%
38
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's ranking in the final AP Top 25
Jan 21, 2025, 12:11 PM
|
|
As long as we finish ahead of the coots were good
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3792]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's ranking in the final AP Top 25
1
Jan 21, 2025, 12:38 PM
|
|
Suck it house coots!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1267]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's ranking in the final AP Top 25
1
Jan 21, 2025, 1:57 PM
|
|
SMU should be below Clemson as well as Ole Miss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 1860
|
|
|
50
