|
Replies: 24
| visibility 310
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46071
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric
Feb 7, 2020, 2:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Tiger [38739]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 33354
Joined: 2011
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric
Feb 7, 2020, 2:30 PM
|
|
R E L O A D
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6938]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric
Feb 8, 2020, 3:23 PM
|
|
Yep, looking at how schools rank it seems to be a bad thing to be ranked high. Nobody wants your players. Reloading is our specialty!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5016]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric
Feb 7, 2020, 2:33 PM
|
|
Not sure I agree with this breakdown:
• Percentage of last season's QB passing yards returning: 32% of offensive returning production formula
• Percentage of last season's WR/TE receiving yards returning: 32%
• Percentage of career starts returning on the offensive line: 17.5%
• Percentage of last season's offensive line snaps returning: 12%
• Percentage of last season's RB rushing yards returning: 6.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3658]
TigerPulse: 96%
35
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric
Feb 7, 2020, 3:03 PM
|
|
So 30% comes from the O-line, where we lost 4 starters.
Imagine if we had to replace our QB and #1 RB, like we will next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5045]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric
Feb 7, 2020, 3:21 PM
|
|
Difference between this year and next will be an experienced and capable back up stepping in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [617]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [558]
TigerPulse: 97%
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5045]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric
Feb 7, 2020, 3:20 PM
|
|
Clemson returns their leading passer and leading rusher as well as 2nd 3rd 4th etc, our 2nd most receiving yards as well as 3rd too..... Really only lose some on the OL here and Tee. Tough to imagine that's 40% comparatively to TL and ETN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [12023]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 14535
Joined: 2014
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric
Feb 7, 2020, 3:23 PM
|
|
Yaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [61]
TigerPulse: 100%
7
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric
Feb 7, 2020, 6:28 PM
|
|
Yes. What he said??.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4821]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric
Feb 7, 2020, 4:15 PM
|
|
Holy Moley... What a useless stat... This would be useful in the NFL...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [141]
TigerPulse: 94%
11
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric
Feb 7, 2020, 4:17 PM
|
|
Totally meaningless. Probably done by a bunch of snot noses with little knowledge of the sport or team. Any consideration to the quality of the back ups ? Not. A waste of time by espn. And I agree the offense info has to be a joke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10552]
TigerPulse: 59%
45
Posts: 13635
Joined: 2006
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric
Feb 7, 2020, 5:11 PM
|
|
Call it retool or rebuild, there is work to be done this off season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [58446]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 44869
Joined: 2003
|
I think Dabo summed it up when he said, "There is nothing
Feb 7, 2020, 7:52 PM
|
|
less important than the score at half time".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2353]
TigerPulse: 98%
32
|
Dabo Lied To Us
Feb 8, 2020, 1:12 AM
|
|
He said next year’s team would be better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [76075]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
|
Percentage of last season's RB rushing yards returning: 6.5%
Feb 8, 2020, 9:35 AM
|
|
???????????????????????????????????????
Lyn-J and ETN both coming back but we lose 93.5% of RB production. I CALL BBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet GOAT [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
|
Re: Percentage of last season's RB rushing yards returning: 6.5%
Feb 8, 2020, 12:26 PM
|
|
???????????????????????????????????????
Lyn-J and ETN both coming back but we lose 93.5% of RB production. I CALL BBS
That’s just the percentage that returning RB production weighs in the formula overall. The formula weighs returning WR/TE tied for the most (with QB) so losing a leading receiver in Tee Higgins plus four starters on the OL has Clemson lower on the list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [83987]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 38471
Joined: 2003
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric
Feb 8, 2020, 9:38 AM
|
|
"We're DOOOOOOMED!"
-Eeyore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [447]
TigerPulse: 93%
17
|
Yeah........
Feb 8, 2020, 9:46 AM
|
|
I’m gonna lose a lot of sleep over this load of bull chit........4 sure.......????????
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6747]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric
Feb 8, 2020, 11:10 AM
|
|
Here’s what we rank high in: a football building full of bad a**#s that have either played a few games or none at all yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [42014]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43486
Joined: 1998
|
huh? Our starting QB and RB are returning
Feb 8, 2020, 12:22 PM
|
|
between them, they were most of our offense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2961]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
I have a hard time....
Feb 8, 2020, 2:29 PM
|
|
......with any ranking which shows Ga Tech at #2, Clemson at #95, and Alabama at #127.
What is the point and how are the rankings developed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16411]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 17848
Joined: 1999
|
ESPN sure knows how to make meaningless stats.***
Feb 8, 2020, 3:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [7031]
TigerPulse: 96%
41
|
I wouldnt call what Uof6C has coming back "production"
Feb 10, 2020, 8:22 AM
|
|
They may be returning players but to call it returning production is a bit misleading. I know its relative to each team but when compared to other teams if you return a team full of players who had a lack of production then what do you really have, lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 24
| visibility 310
|
|
|
50
