|
Replies: 28
| visibility 3415
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46461
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Clemson future football schedule opponent announced
2
Mar 24, 2025, 11:53 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [30335]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 22934
Joined: 2002
|
Is there a rule that says all of our major OOC games have to be with SEC ?
1
Mar 24, 2025, 12:03 PM
|
|
What about a home and home with Nebraska for old times sake ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1851]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Is there a rule that says all of our major OOC games have to be with SEC ?
1
Mar 24, 2025, 12:19 PM
|
|
make it Michigan and I'm all in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [15318]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 15818
Joined: 2010
|
Re: Is there a rule that says all of our major OOC games have to be with SEC ?
1
Mar 24, 2025, 12:23 PM
[ in reply to Is there a rule that says all of our major OOC games have to be with SEC ? ] |
|
The BIG has 9 conference games and they may be doing a non con with the SEC in the future. They don't want to schedule Clemson too. We may be playing non con against only Big 12 teams in the future if this SEC-Big Ten challenge goes through.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7690]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Furman Vs Clemson ---
3
Mar 24, 2025, 12:04 PM
|
|
I'm sure that will put the stadium at 98,000-plus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16990]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 21895
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Furman Vs Clemson ---
4
Mar 24, 2025, 12:23 PM
|
|
I do agree with your sarcastic post. We have no business playing those teams. When we win, we're supposed to. If the score is not a blowout, we look weak, and our conference is viewed as too weak anyway. Nothing to be gained with this that couldn't be gained through an internal scrimmage, and we wouldn't have to pay a bunch of money to a team we have no business playing. Same is true for Citadel, SCST, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redshirt [92]
TigerPulse: 100%
10
|
Re: Furman Vs Clemson ---
2
Mar 24, 2025, 12:51 PM
|
|
I could be mistaken but I believe it is state law for us to play in state smaller schools…though I don’t know how many times we must do that each year but I agree with the rest of your premise…that we aren’t helped in polling playing small schools, but it does give us an off ish week in the schedule and an opportunity to expand player participation with back ups and give starters a rest or chance to build stats… there are benefits but it’s always an offset of something else…
Go Tigers!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62642]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62715
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Furman Vs Clemson ---
Mar 24, 2025, 5:33 PM
|
|
The thing that I hate about us having to play in state schools is the risk of players being injured in a meaningless game...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redshirt [92]
TigerPulse: 100%
10
|
Re: Furman Vs Clemson ---
1
Mar 24, 2025, 12:51 PM
[ in reply to Re: Furman Vs Clemson --- ] |
|
I could be mistaken but I believe it is state law for us to play in state smaller schools…though I don’t know how many times we must do that each year but I agree with the rest of your premise…that we aren’t helped in polling playing small schools, but it does give us an off ish week in the schedule and an opportunity to expand player participation with back ups and give starters a rest or chance to build stats… there are benefits but it’s always an offset of something else…
Go Tigers!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redshirt [92]
TigerPulse: 100%
10
|
Re: Furman Vs Clemson ---
1
Mar 24, 2025, 12:52 PM
|
|
Sorry…button error…can someone delete the redundant posts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [29768]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 18979
Joined: 2000
|
I believe your mistaken
1
Mar 24, 2025, 1:48 PM
|
|
Buy one of those 'circle R' thingy memberships and you can delete your own posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redshirt [92]
TigerPulse: 100%
10
|
Re: Furman Vs Clemson ---
1
Mar 24, 2025, 12:51 PM
[ in reply to Re: Furman Vs Clemson --- ] |
|
I could be mistaken but I believe it is state law for us to play in state smaller schools…though I don’t know how many times we must do that each year but I agree with the rest of your premise…that we aren’t helped in polling playing small schools, but it does give us an off ish week in the schedule and an opportunity to expand player participation with back ups and give starters a rest or chance to build stats… there are benefits but it’s always an offset of something else…
Go Tigers!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redshirt [92]
TigerPulse: 100%
10
|
Re: Furman Vs Clemson ---
1
Mar 24, 2025, 12:51 PM
[ in reply to Re: Furman Vs Clemson --- ] |
|
I could be mistaken but I believe it is state law for us to play in state smaller schools…though I don’t know how many times we must do that each year but I agree with the rest of your premise…that we aren’t helped in polling playing small schools, but it does give us an off ish week in the schedule and an opportunity to expand player participation with back ups and give starters a rest or chance to build stats… there are benefits but it’s always an offset of something else…
Go Tigers!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redshirt [92]
TigerPulse: 100%
10
|
Re: Furman Vs Clemson ---
1
Mar 24, 2025, 12:51 PM
[ in reply to Re: Furman Vs Clemson --- ] |
|
I could be mistaken but I believe it is state law for us to play in state smaller schools…though I don’t know how many times we must do that each year but I agree with the rest of your premise…that we aren’t helped in polling playing small schools, but it does give us an off ish week in the schedule and an opportunity to expand player participation with back ups and give starters a rest or chance to build stats… there are benefits but it’s always an offset of something else…
Go Tigers!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [284]
TigerPulse: 100%
14
|
Re: Furman Vs Clemson ---
1
Mar 24, 2025, 1:15 PM
[ in reply to Re: Furman Vs Clemson --- ] |
|
Agree 100%, but it’s the only way to get 7 home games every year which is built into the athletic department and Clemson community budget.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [608]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Re: Furman Vs Clemson ---
Mar 24, 2025, 4:29 PM
[ in reply to Furman Vs Clemson --- ] |
|
Massive SOS boost...Don't know if there will be enough chips and dip available at all the watch parties for those who can't find tickets on Ticket Master or Stub Hub!
Please...do better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69727]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90797
Joined: 2001
|
Is Bobby Robinson still sitting in the AD chair?
6
6
Mar 24, 2025, 12:47 PM
|
|
That man funneled more money to Furman than the Chinese funneled to the Biden crime family.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [42205]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 18864
Joined: 2015
|
I feel baited, and not by a master.
3
Mar 24, 2025, 1:33 PM
|
|
Headline seemed like this may be interesting, an Alabama, a Michigan, but no, Furman
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5964]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
^^^ THIS, so anticlimactic after opening***
Mar 24, 2025, 1:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2652]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: TNET: Clemson future football schedule opponent announced
Mar 24, 2025, 1:36 PM
|
|
don't understand why these pre-season games are scheduled during the season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8346]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: TNET: Clemson future football schedule opponent announced
Mar 24, 2025, 2:27 PM
|
|
Yay FU
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12335]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 14696
Joined: 2014
|
Re: TNET: Clemson future football schedule opponent announced
Mar 24, 2025, 5:51 PM
|
|
I can't wait!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4127]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: TNET: Clemson future football schedule opponent announced
Mar 24, 2025, 10:39 PM
|
|
Thought the state law applied only to the Usuk game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5820]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: TNET: Clemson future football schedule opponent announced
Mar 25, 2025, 9:37 AM
|
|
I've heard this for decades but never seen the statute. Is this real or is this urban legend?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22271]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 18022
Joined: 2005
|
No problem at all helping the little guys in state
1
Mar 24, 2025, 10:49 PM
|
|
Dabo plays one basically every year. During his time we've played them all:Furman, Citadel, Wofford, PC, Coastal and State
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [608]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Re: No problem at all helping the little guys in state
Mar 25, 2025, 9:35 AM
|
|
...how about the Newberry Blue Hose, the Erskine Flying Fleet or Anderson College Ravens...they "Need the dues!"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22271]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 18022
Joined: 2005
|
Not FCS teams
1
Mar 25, 2025, 9:40 AM
|
|
SEC does the exact same thing. We always schedule 2 power 4 out of conference teams including the coots, one group of 5, and 1 FCS.
It's worked pretty well. And it guarantees us 7 home games
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2942]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
I dont understand why folks are so upset?
Mar 25, 2025, 11:08 AM
|
|
We’ve had this schedule formula for decades. South Carolina, a power 4-5 opponent, a mid major, and an instate FCS team. Every single year!
It’s a great chance for our guys who don’t play. Lot to get in and gain experience.
FU once, Fu twice FU ALL OF THE TIME
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [420]
TigerPulse: 50%
17
|
Re: TNET: Clemson future football schedule opponent announced
Mar 24, 2025, 11:53 PM
|
|
Kinda wish we didn't have to wait 'til 2029 to play y'all again.
(But at least once we get there, we do play 4 times in 5 years: scheduled in '29, '30, '32, & '33)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 28
| visibility 3415
|
|
|
50
