GIVE AN AWARD

Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

Big Brain

Love it!

100

Cheers

100

Helpful

100

Made Me Smile

100

Great Idea!

150

Mind Blown

150

Caring

200

Flammable

200

Hear ye, hear ye

200

Bravo

250

Nom Nom Nom

250

Take My Coins

500

Ooo, Shiny!

700

Treasured Post!

1000

YOUR BALANCE

What are TNET coins™?

TNET: The Drive for Five: Clemson vs. South Carolina prediction

storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive

add New Topic

Replies: 8 \| visibility 2487

TigerNet News®

Webmaster [∞]

TigerPulse: 100%

∞

Posts: 45376

Joined: 2012

TNET: The Drive for Five: Clemson vs. South Carolina prediction

Nov 23, 2018, 12:56 PM

The Drive for Five: Clemson vs. South Carolina prediction

Good old fashioned neighborly hate. Welcome to the Clemson versus South Carolina football rivalry. The Tigers have won four in a row in the series and look to add a fifth when the teams meet at 7 pm Saturday night in Death Valley.
Full Story »

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

Enjoy TigerNet? Upgrade and get your ® today, thanks!

Fluxus

Paw Warrior [4757]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 3201

Joined: 2003

Plyler

Nov 23, 2018, 2:24 PM

For the 11th time this season, Plyler has picked our opponent to score double digits against our D. No wonder he hasn't won a pick-em yet. I vote to replace him with Nicholas the Dolphin.

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

TIGEROTIS

Recruit [88]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 135

Joined: 2000

Re: Plyler

Nov 24, 2018, 12:22 AM

I think Mickey is thinking about 3rd string being in most of games. Including this Saturday!??

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

Mickey Plyler®

Head Coach [928]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 288

Joined: 1999

Picked 63-17 as a tribute to the 2003 team***

Nov 24, 2018, 1:00 PM [ in reply to Plyler ]

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

mpercy®

Paw Warrior [4929]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 3533

Joined: 2001

Re: RPO

Nov 23, 2018, 2:50 PM

The RPO concept is sound if well executed, e.g. DW4's execution was almost always dead-on but KB's execution was maybe 50-50 on correct read (and he WANTED to run it himself).

We can still run or pass out of RPO look, but still have planned runs and planned passes. Old-fashioned play-action pass can look like RPO but be a pass all the way. Pump-fake pass misdirection can be a run all the way. Line knows what they have to do instead of trying to both pass- and run-block at the same time and not excelling at either.