|
Replies: 16
| visibility 126
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 45378
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Season preview: Ranking a challenging group of QBs Clemson will face
Aug 30, 2022, 7:00 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [10403]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Glad you pointed out Jordan Travis's stats in last 3 games
Aug 30, 2022, 7:29 AM
|
|
Because for the life of me I haven't understood all the preseason hype. The times I've watched him play I've seen a QB that's not very good. Even with the increase in yardage those last 3 games I'm not buying in that he's a good QB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [-98]
TigerPulse: 27%
-1
|
Re: TNET: Season preview: Ranking a challenging group of QBs Clemson will face
Aug 30, 2022, 8:20 AM
|
|
Lol. These QBs would be 3rd string at Clemson.
I don't see any challenges that our defense won't absolutely dominate against.
There are tiers to the game. Clemson is Tier 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [980]
TigerPulse: 99%
24
|
Re: TNET: Season preview: Ranking a challenging group of QBs Clemson will face
Aug 30, 2022, 8:37 AM
|
|
Uh..... pretty sure our D has nightmares of Cunningham, that guy is the only one that worries me, TVD had an excellent year but hopefully will have his sophomore slump. But I agree about every other QB, they aren't a match for our D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11128]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13201
Joined: 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [-98]
TigerPulse: 27%
-1
|
Re: TNET: Season preview: Ranking a challenging group of QBs Clemson will face
Aug 30, 2022, 8:22 AM
|
|
Some of these QBs were pretty much on their college rosters when Trevor Lawrence was playing in High School.
5 Year Junior. lmao
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1438]
TigerPulse: 97%
29
|
Re: TNET: Season preview: Ranking a challenging group of QBs Clemson will face
Aug 10, 2024, 9:44 AM
|
|
Coots aren’t going to like this ranking. But think it’s spot on. I also like that Slovis kid and potential at Pitt for a ACC championship rematch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7522]
TigerPulse: 99%
42
|
Re: TNET: Season preview: Ranking a challenging group of QBs Clemson will face
Aug 30, 2022, 9:57 AM
|
|
There's just no way that a guy with 4600 yards, 40 TDs, 12 INTs, 70% completion percentage, and a 166 passer rating is 6th on this list lol.
Leary and Cunningham are the only ones that could be debated ahead of Rattler. At worst, he's 3rd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [581]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Re: TNET: Season preview: Ranking a challenging group of QBs Clemson will face
Aug 30, 2022, 10:23 AM
|
|
I think the top 6 on this list are all pretty good. I could see Rattler above Jordan Travis, but I'm really high on Travis this season. I think FSU is going to make a bowl. Rattler has loads of potential so he could end up #1, but he has some downside too. I just don't know how much of his success was based on the system, but I expect him to be the best QB they've had since Connor Shaw either way. He will make U of SC a threat in every game they play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19710]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 15042
Joined: 2010
|
Re: TNET: Season preview: Ranking a challenging group of QBs Clemson will face
Aug 30, 2022, 11:26 AM
|
|
Ryan_Kantor® ... Where would you rank Hartman if not injured? Was looking forward to the game at Wake and Hartman as a warmup for Wolfpack. TIA ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [581]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Re: TNET: Season preview: Ranking a challenging group of QBs Clemson will face
Aug 30, 2022, 10:52 PM
|
|
Without digging into the stats, I think I’d have him behind Leary and Cunningham. His numbers are insane but they run a ton of tempo so it is a bit skewed. He also had a really great start but didn’t play well in their biggest games to close the season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [560]
TigerPulse: 71%
20
|
Re: TNET: Season preview: Ranking a challenging group of QBs Clemson will face
Aug 30, 2022, 11:31 AM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Season preview: Ranking a challenging group of QBs Clemson will face ] |
|
I think the top 6 on this list are all pretty good. I could see Rattler above Jordan Travis, but I'm really high on Travis this season. I think FSU is going to make a bowl. Rattler has loads of potential so he could end up #1, but he has some downside too. I just don't know how much of his success was based on the system, but I expect him to be the best QB they've had since Connor Shaw either way. He will make U of SC a threat in every game they play.
There are two chances the snake plays against Clemson -- slim and none. He will be badly injured by the UGay? D. JUST MHO. NOT wishing for anyone 2b injured!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1060]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: TNET: Season preview: Ranking a challenging group of QBs Clemson will face
Aug 30, 2022, 10:16 AM
|
|
It's hard to read the list of the best QB's in the ACC and not have a Clemson QB among the leaders. I know you were just ranking opponents, but DJ would have been near the bottom last year. I hope this is the last year we have to say that. I am expecting much more out of DJ this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [970]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: TNET: Season preview: Ranking a challenging group of QBs Clemson will face
Aug 31, 2022, 9:44 PM
|
|
DJ may be rated among the best QB's in the ACC, but I'll bet that Clemson will have one of the best QB's in the ACC. Barring transfers, we will have three 5* QB's on campus next year. Pick your starter,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9627]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
I'm not worried about these QB's, I'm worried about us
Aug 30, 2022, 5:55 PM
|
|
scoring points. We do that, we're fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [80942]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 37418
Joined: 2003
|
What needs to happen to get Clemson back on top of the ACC
Aug 30, 2022, 6:02 PM
|
|
again is to once again make this statement true:
"No QB plays very well when he is laying flat on his back."
Period, end of synopsis.
Signed,
The Power Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [83]
TigerPulse: 99%
9
|
Re: What needs to happen to get Clemson back on top of the ACC
Sep 1, 2022, 11:10 AM
|
|
well said, we'll see how this list of QBs do when they are dealing with our pass rush
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 126
|
|
|
50
