Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 43
| visibility 6151

TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher

1

Nov 29, 2024, 11:36 AM

 
Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher

Full Story »


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Wow.***

3

Nov 29, 2024, 11:36 AM



2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's something in these hills.


Re: Wow.***


Nov 29, 2024, 12:11 PM

Reality … Go Tigers !!!

2025 white level membertnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Playtime is over........ time to go to work!

2

Nov 29, 2024, 12:19 PM [ in reply to Wow.*** ]

Tigers 41 - Chickens 17

Eat'em up Tigers!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow.***


Nov 29, 2024, 2:25 PM [ in reply to Wow.*** ]

WOW is right, but what they're not saying is that the SEC stands to gain the most from USUC winning bc it would push Bama and USUC with the best chances to get in the playoffs if things were to roll the wrong way for any of the other teams already listed for the playoffs.

The playoff committee and every other talking sports head consistently talk about Quality wins, but what they're not talking about is Texass, looking over their schedule and their wins with a 2 loss Georgia being their only quality win bc everybody else they have beat has 4 plus losses not counting the losses that may come up on Saturday, and they have Texass slotted as the #3 team in the playoffs. If that isn't bias on the grand stage of the SEC, I guess I need BIAS explained to me all over again bc I must have that definition wrong, or I'm mixed up on what a quality win actually means, I guess...
.

For anyone wanting to take a look I'm making it easy for you with the links below start with their schedule, just click on the teams they beat, then click that teams schedule and see for yourself. The playoff ranking will be the last link.

https://www.espn.com/college-football/team/schedule/_/id/251

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/ncaa-football/rankings

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Wow.***


Nov 29, 2024, 4:29 PM

Plus if TAMU wins over UT but lose to UGA big. That could bump UT the real one out of playoffs cause no quality wins.

2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

TEK


Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all

2
3

Nov 29, 2024, 11:48 AM

Orange colored glasses or towing the company line. I hate it, but think the Coots win fairly comfortably, 31-17. More about us not being good than them being good!

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all

1
3

Nov 29, 2024, 11:52 AM

They run it well and we don't stop it consistently. That's always been tbe calling card for Clemson under Swinney. Not this year. I do feel the offense will do its part, but the defense will fail it in complimentary football. Gamecocks 34 Clemson 24.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all


Nov 29, 2024, 12:23 PM

Their run game is mediocre at best, Sanders only has 821 yds on the season. Mafah has 1012. I'm not worried.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all


Nov 29, 2024, 4:30 PM

Plus 214 yards tomorrow

2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

TEK


Re: Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all


Nov 29, 2024, 2:48 PM [ in reply to Re: Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all ]

I think I'm going to use common sense with my prediction, and I'm taking off my favorite orange glasses, dang it, I really hate doing that, but here you go.

Honestly this season I don't have a feeling of who I believe will win this game tomorrow, but I do feel that whoever wins the game, the score will be by 3-7 points margin for the winner. I do not believe there will be many points separating the winner from the loser. It "should" be a pretty good game, probably the best game we've seen between these two teams in a very long time.

When playing a team that has fight in them inside DV, our home team usually starts off pretty slow until the coaching staff gets them to settle down. Knowing that's what I feel I've seen over the years, our guys will probably be down by 7 going into the 2nd quarter, and I'm praying that our Tigers will come back and win this game.

I'm getting too old for this type of stress, so I hope that our HC will see clearly that some changes need to be made, and the way that I see it, for sure I believe there should be at least 2 coaching changes with me keeping my personal feelings about those two slots to myself.

Go Tigers and beat those egg laying bitty hatching chickens from Cootlumbia!!!!

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all


Nov 29, 2024, 4:40 PM [ in reply to Re: Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all ]

That is coming from Liberal Rooster

2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

TEK


Re: Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all

1

Nov 29, 2024, 12:38 PM [ in reply to Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all ]

lol, not a chance. If SCAR wins, it’ll be 28-27 on a missed kick.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all

1

Nov 29, 2024, 12:55 PM [ in reply to Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all ]

Glad that Clemson fans are showing they’re weaker than coot fans ####### pathetic. When we win Saturday don’t celebrate hit the corner and cry

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all

1

Nov 29, 2024, 1:59 PM

Picking a loss doesn't make anyone weak. That's the stupid mentality on this website. You can see true weaknesses on your own team and see real football reasons as to why another team could beat your team. Most on here are saying that they hope their wrong, but they see a South Carolina team that is really good and extremely dangerous. Not weak, just educated in football!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Thank you! I definitely hope Im wrong.***


Nov 29, 2024, 2:39 PM



tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all


Nov 29, 2024, 4:37 PM [ in reply to Re: Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all ]

Lots of weak Tiger fans on TigerNet lately. When Tigers blowout steriod chickens tomorrow just say anything. 12 team Playoffs system already got babies crying from SEC begging for 6 teams in. Could end up having conference winners with 3 or 4 losses.

2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

TEK


Re: Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all


Nov 29, 2024, 4:38 PM [ in reply to Re: Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all ]

Makes you BJ Harris voter

2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

TEK


It's fine if they win, but their obnoxious fans suck. They usually don't even


Nov 29, 2024, 2:20 PM [ in reply to Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all ]

Know the score

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all


Nov 29, 2024, 2:28 PM [ in reply to Well, at least some are finally being real with their picks this week. Not all ]

I surly hope that your thinking doesn't tilt that often, that could make life pretty tough;)

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher

3

Nov 29, 2024, 11:52 AM

I hope we are fully prepared for this game unlike how they were against louisville and our run defense last week against the Citadel. If reaching the playoffs is the tigers goal, I hope they fully realize their playoff run starts tomorrow not next week only if Miami loses tomorrow! Hoping they put it together on both sides of the ball tomorrow and play their best game of the year! South Carolina is a really good team this year and you know are not coming up here to take it on the chin again.

GO TIGERS!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher


Nov 29, 2024, 2:51 PM

Unless we are going to get a chance to replay the Louisville game, I think it would be best if we just let it go and stop bringing up every time we have something to say about the Tiger team that most confess to love!!!

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher


Nov 29, 2024, 4:49 PM

It’s pretty simple. We have not looked impressive all year and this year the coots have a pulse. I agree, it will be close but I do think the coots have that much more desire to win and that is unfortunate

2025 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher

3

Nov 29, 2024, 11:54 AM

Never thought I’d see the day DHood comes out as a coot. Tnet has truly fallen 🥲

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher

4

Nov 29, 2024, 12:01 PM

TikTiger said:

Never thought I’d see the day DHood comes out as a coot. Tnet has truly fallen 🥲




I think he is just trying to reverse jinx the coots.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher

2

Nov 29, 2024, 12:06 PM

35-14 Tigers!! Coots suck!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher

3

Nov 29, 2024, 12:07 PM [ in reply to Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher ]

Nope. These guys are realist when it comes to watching football. We could win, but if you're picking you look at match-ups. This year their strength is our weakness. Could be wrong, but 11 games is a good sample size of reality.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher

1

Nov 29, 2024, 12:39 PM

We will win.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher

1

Nov 29, 2024, 12:51 PM [ in reply to Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher ]

If they are so great , why are we ranked above them and why have they lost 3 games?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Boo David Hood, Ryan Kantor, and Grayson Mann

1

Nov 29, 2024, 12:07 PM

Boo all of you

2025 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Boo David Hood, Ryan Kantor, and Grayson Mann


Nov 29, 2024, 12:53 PM

Harrumph

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher


Nov 29, 2024, 12:10 PM

David Hood and Grayson Mann picking the coots…dang. Not good

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

David Hood, thanks for your prediction

1

Nov 29, 2024, 12:14 PM

With your record, I feel a little better about tomorrow.

Thanks for all the great insights in your articles and podcasts.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: David Hood, thanks for your prediction


Nov 29, 2024, 12:42 PM

His Better Half is much more right than wrong than DH

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: David Hood, thanks for your prediction


Nov 29, 2024, 12:45 PM

I'm taking Nikki for the win!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher


Nov 29, 2024, 12:50 PM

Regardless what has happened in the last 11 games this is a game the Tigers can take and finally put together a complete game with the offense, defense and special teams. Have the confidence knowing Clemson is the better team, will play smarter, will want to win, leave everything on the field and last but not least have fun doing it. The Tigers are a team of committed recruits that have forged a bond to have each others back playing against highly paid mercenaries. When the game begins it will simply be 11 on 11. GO TIGERS.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The Top 4 TNET pickers, in points, chose Clemson


Nov 29, 2024, 12:57 PM

The three who took the Coots can walk the plank

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher


Nov 29, 2024, 1:45 PM

I mean, it's not an unrealistic pick. They have looked better than us recently and are healthier.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Reverse Psychology David?...***


Nov 29, 2024, 1:57 PM



DavidHood®

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher


Nov 29, 2024, 2:12 PM

So we are giving up on Clemson! Granted USUCK is a good team especially on defense but we are playing at home and have a lot to play for by beating a ranked team. Clemson 31 Coots 28.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher


Nov 29, 2024, 3:28 PM

Everything points to a last drive game. If our O line holds up and if we can protect on extra points and field goals, we can prevail.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher


Nov 29, 2024, 8:18 PM

We are very capable of winning and if both teams play up to their potential we win but… after watching us literally give away a 7 game winning streak that should’ve been 8, in Death Valley just 2 years ago mind you, with a matchup then that was WAY more favorable to us than this year I won’t even begin to guess what could happen tomorrow.

We’re capable of greatness but absolutely unpredictable as to when it will occur and if I’m being honest with this team it seems it shows up mainly when it not needed or there is no pressure.

Hoping for the best however; go tigers!!!

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher

1

Nov 29, 2024, 4:24 PM

Clemson Tigers by 28 and Auburn Tigers by 4

2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

TEK


Re: TNET: Clemson vs. South Carolina Prediction: Rivalry stakes have never been higher


Nov 29, 2024, 6:48 PM

Go Tigers! 🐅

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Class of '87


Replies: 43
| visibility 6151
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic