Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Dumbest things our new Bammer friends have said
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 25
| visibility 1

Dumbest things our new Bammer friends have said


Jan 6, 2016, 9:33 AM



Feel free to add your own submissions.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That Idiot Greg McElroy


Jan 6, 2016, 9:36 AM

said that tiger d was not designed to stop the run. I honestly cannot believe these people have jobs. i will be on radio tomorrow morning talking to those two tards and it will not be pretty.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I for one am glad you are stopping. You are one of the most ignorant posters ever. You obviously think very highly of your own opinion, unlike the rest of us - RockHillTiger


Re: That Idiot Greg McElroy


Jan 6, 2016, 9:54 AM

If you do, use these stats to argue them:
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaadl

Run-blocking stats

Adjusted Line Yards: One of only two opponent-adjusted numbers on the page, this aligns with the ALY figure FO tracks for the NFL and is presented on a scale in which 100.0 is perfectly average, above 100 is good, below 100 is bad.
Clemson #4 (127.9)


Standard Downs Line Yards per Carry: The raw, unadjusted per-carry line yardage for a team on standard downs (first down, second-and-7 or fewer, third-and-4 or fewer, fourth-and-4 or fewer).
Clemson #4 (2.17)

Passing Downs Line Yards per Carry: The same unadjusted averages for rushing on passing downs.
Clemson #38 (2.90)

Opportunity Rate: The percentage of carries (when five yards are available) that gain at least five yards, i.e. the percentage of carries in which the line does its job, so to speak.
Clemson #11 (33.1%)

Power Success Rate: This is the same as on the pro side -- percentage of runs on third or fourth down, two yards or less to go, that achieved a first down or touchdown.
Clemson #3 (44.1%)

Stuff Rate: Same as STUFFED on the pro side -- percentage of carries by running backs that are stopped at or before the line of scrimmage.
Clemson #2 (27.9%)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Kiffen's inability as a head coach


Jan 6, 2016, 9:38 AM

and that his ethics and morals wouldn't fill up a thimble doesn't take away from the fact that he's a #### good offensive mind. Best in the country, don't know how you measure that. But he's up there.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So with 5 stars at almost every position, 4th in the SEC is


Jan 6, 2016, 9:40 AM

good?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Wait, they have some positions that ain't 5 star?


Jan 6, 2016, 9:43 AM

Heads about to roll in Tide country.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Because at the end of the game, everyone knew that they weren’t that much better than us or better than us at all."


Yes


Jan 6, 2016, 9:46 AM [ in reply to So with 5 stars at almost every position, 4th in the SEC is ]

with the style of offense they run, 4th is very good. They aren't built to rack up offensive stats. But look at how they beat MSU. MSU's D wasn't ready for what Bama threw at them on O. He calls a very good game and finds weaknesses in the opponents D.


He did the same thing at USC. Their Os were very good. D's were terrible.
He did the same thing at Tenn.


He's not head coach material, but he's certainly up there among offensive sides.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Except for a 2000 yard rusher?***


Jan 6, 2016, 10:01 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Except for a 2000 yard rusher?***


Jan 6, 2016, 10:12 AM

Now there you go again Bob. Bama's O is geared to grinding the opposing D and chewing the clock. When all is said and done the other team KNOWS they've been in a fight. Anyone with a brain the size of a squirrel's knows that.

Yes, Henry ran for 2061 yards, but if Drake hadn't have broken his arm against Miss St it may have been more like 1800, if that makes you feel better.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I feel much better now.


Jan 6, 2016, 10:17 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Always happy to help a new friend***


Jan 6, 2016, 10:28 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Whats yer point?


Jan 6, 2016, 10:34 AM [ in reply to Except for a 2000 yard rusher?*** ]

That Lane set up ways for his best player to be featured? Sounds like thats what a good OC should do.

Do Elliot/Scott deserve LESS credit because they have a superstar in Watson and find creative ways to use him?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

They deserve more credit for running a fast-paced offense


Jan 6, 2016, 10:36 AM

that puts up points and still keeps the defense off the field.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So now you're just arguing style


Jan 6, 2016, 10:47 AM

you prefer one way over the other. Doesn't take away from what Kiffin can do as a coach. And he's proven he can coach both.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Give me a playbook and send me to Bama. Also give me his


Jan 6, 2016, 10:49 AM

wife. I'd probably be 9-3 at the end of the season.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

alabama's offense is ~51st overall this year, the lowest


Jan 6, 2016, 11:07 AM

it's been since early in saban's tenure?

in lane's defense, the offense broke bama's record for yards in his first year; i don't know if that's a huge accomplishment, but it is the record.

i thought they had a great offensive game plan versus msu and really hope coker isn't as efficient against clemson. i'd give lane an A for that game and everything i've read says he's the man when it comes to the O there.

yes, they're stupid rich in talent. kiffin's had some pretty wicked gigs where he's had a lot of toys with which to play, but some pretty good coaches must think he's good at what he does?

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


If I had his wife, I'd be too distracted to coach


Jan 6, 2016, 11:15 AM [ in reply to Give me a playbook and send me to Bama. Also give me his ]

but one could say the same thing about the offensive weapons that we have. Give me a playbook and DW4, Scott, Williams, Cain, Legget etc and I could be 9-3 too.

We have great weapons at WR, QB above average RB and OL. We rely on our offense more and gameplan to that.
They have great weapons at OL and RB. Average WR overall and an average QB. They rely on their defense more and game plan accordingly.


Doesn't change a thing about the offensive coaches that either team has. They are all right up there with the best.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

They want to see Watson beat us with his arm.


Jan 6, 2016, 9:55 AM

They have not watched us all year if they think waston is only a threat running. And once again no one thinks we have a running back. Pick your poison.
GO TIGERS!!!

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

They have a tendency to give up big pass plays.***


Jan 6, 2016, 9:56 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: They want to see Watson beat us with his arm.


Jan 6, 2016, 10:08 AM [ in reply to They want to see Watson beat us with his arm. ]

We all know Watson has thrown for over 3500 yards. No one really thinks he is not a passing threat. And yes, we do want to see Watson beat us with his arm. Do we have another choice? Should we just let Watson and Gallman run all over us like Oklahoma so you don't have to attempt many passes? You will do the same thing with Coker. It would be too easy on us if you didn't key in on stopping Henry. We'll pick our poison and hopefully contain Watson

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Dumbest things our new Bammer friends have said


Jan 6, 2016, 10:53 AM

Met him when he came to our school when he was @ Tenn to recruit Devin Taylor, Jimmie Legree and Justin Parker. Had a semi-friendly exterior but had a real douchy air about him.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Dumbest things our new Bammer friends have said


Jan 6, 2016, 10:53 AM

> > src="http://s11.postimg.org/4viawiweb/Untitled.png"wid
> th="100%">
>
> Feel free to add your own submissions.
"I think Clemson will give us trouble" ;)

/thread

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Dumbest things our new Bammer friends have said


Jan 6, 2016, 11:03 AM

"RollTideMang said:
January 4th, 2016 11:34 AM
Re: Film Study on Clemson
They beat ND by two points. tOSU slaughtered ND in the bowl game. MSU beat tOSU in the regular season. We beat MSU 38-0.

I rest my case.
B.S. in MSE from the University of Alabama at Birmingham
M.S. in MSE from the University of Florida (in progress. expected by 2016).

Roll Tide."


I guess MSE must not stand for "mathematically sound extrapolation". Watch out Newton and Leibniz, this guy is carving out a whole new field of mathematics.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

He forgot "in a monsoon"***


Jan 6, 2016, 11:04 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Dumbest things our new Bammer friends have said


Jan 6, 2016, 11:10 AM

They also site the Louisville game a lot as a bad one for us, ignoring that DW was still healing , while talking about how much they've grown since the ole Miss game, as if we haven't. One guy on their board also said unCheat "should have" beat us if it wasn't for the bogus onside kick call.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Hard to tell if that's the dumbest. There has been a lot of


Jan 6, 2016, 11:18 AM

subject matter to choose from.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 25
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic