|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1270
|
Game Changer [1880]
TigerPulse: 94%
31
|
The blueprint for beating SEC teams is gonna be a fast paced
Jan 7, 2013, 10:06 PM
|
|
offense, with a mobile QB, and a defense good enough to stop the power running game. The SEC has recruited huge defensive players that will wear down against a faced paced offensive attack. Of course, you still have to defend against their huge offensive lines and power running games. I think Dabo is on the right track, and just needs a few more years to get the defensive players needed to beat these guys on a regular basis. It's coming.
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4867]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
Re: The blueprint for beating SEC teams is gonna be a fast paced
Jan 7, 2013, 10:06 PM
|
|
Yep. Watching Oregon the other night, their offense would torch this defense. ND's offense plays right into the strength of Bama's defense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1245]
TigerPulse: 27%
27
|
the key ti beating fast paced teams is ball control
Jan 7, 2013, 10:09 PM
|
|
that's why Oregon keeps losing just enough to keep them out of these games - they run into a team that controls the ball and clock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [39]
TigerPulse: 19%
4
|
Re: The blueprint for beating SEC teams is gonna be a fast paced
Jan 7, 2013, 10:09 PM
|
|
Need to have a great OL to do that, see TAMU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1144]
TigerPulse: 53%
26
|
Re: The blueprint for beating SEC teams is gonna be a fast paced
Jan 7, 2013, 10:09 PM
|
|
Clemson check, check, check, in the Carolina game......did we win? There goes that theory!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1880]
TigerPulse: 94%
31
|
Try reading the post next time coot.
Jan 7, 2013, 10:13 PM
|
|
I said CU needs afew more years of defensive player recruits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1144]
TigerPulse: 53%
26
|
Re: Try reading the post next time coot.
Jan 7, 2013, 10:50 PM
|
|
Try reading your own post, "tater". BTW, if anyone calls logic on you, the coot card comes out, right? Wanna see my CU diploma? It probably wouldn't matter, huh? I was noting that WE (that would be Clemson) stopped the run, have a HUNH offense, a mobile QB, and they beat the hell out of us by passing the ball with midget WR's and a 2nd string QB (not to mention the point guard for the 2nd straight year)! You did not mention a ### thing about pass defense in your post, and we better have that to beat those SEC teams, LSU excepted, of course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Icon [151764]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35577
Joined: 2010
|
Clemson vs LSU. Ooops, theory is back.***
Jan 7, 2013, 10:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1144]
TigerPulse: 53%
26
|
Re: Clemson vs LSU. Ooops, theory is back.***
Jan 7, 2013, 10:53 PM
|
|
No, LSU has no passing attack. That's my point to OP....best have a pass defense for SEC teams, also.....LSU excepted, of course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18213]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 22450
Joined: 1999
|
Ans Saban knows it. That's why he was whining about
Jan 7, 2013, 10:12 PM
|
|
HUNH offenses.
And that's why he's SATAN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69706]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90789
Joined: 2001
|
Oregon/Bama would have been an interesting match-up***
Jan 7, 2013, 10:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Icon [151764]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35577
Joined: 2010
|
LSU excepted, and also Auburn***
Jan 7, 2013, 10:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1144]
TigerPulse: 53%
26
|
Re: LSU excepted, and also Auburn***
Jan 8, 2013, 5:50 AM
|
|
You are so correct, sir! Forgot about them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1270
|
|
|
50
